Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02
    0.02468502 = product of:
      0.04937004 = sum of:
        0.04937004 = product of:
          0.09874008 = sum of:
            0.09874008 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09874008 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  2. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02
    0.02468502 = product of:
      0.04937004 = sum of:
        0.04937004 = product of:
          0.09874008 = sum of:
            0.09874008 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09874008 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  3. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02
    0.02468502 = product of:
      0.04937004 = sum of:
        0.04937004 = product of:
          0.09874008 = sum of:
            0.09874008 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09874008 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  4. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02
    0.02468502 = product of:
      0.04937004 = sum of:
        0.04937004 = product of:
          0.09874008 = sum of:
            0.09874008 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09874008 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  5. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  6. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  7. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  8. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  9. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  10. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  11. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02
    0.021599391 = product of:
      0.043198783 = sum of:
        0.043198783 = product of:
          0.086397566 = sum of:
            0.086397566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086397566 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  13. Hinüber, C. von: ¬Das Sachregister : Ein inhaltlicher Zugang zu Akten eines Stadtarchivs (2004) 0.02
    0.02095752 = product of:
      0.04191504 = sum of:
        0.04191504 = product of:
          0.08383008 = sum of:
            0.08383008 = weight(_text_:c in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08383008 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02
    0.017454945 = product of:
      0.03490989 = sum of:
        0.03490989 = product of:
          0.06981978 = sum of:
            0.06981978 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06981978 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  15. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02
    0.015428137 = product of:
      0.030856274 = sum of:
        0.030856274 = product of:
          0.061712548 = sum of:
            0.061712548 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061712548 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  16. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.010799696 = product of:
      0.021599391 = sum of:
        0.021599391 = product of:
          0.043198783 = sum of:
            0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043198783 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  18. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
    0.0077140685 = product of:
      0.015428137 = sum of:
        0.015428137 = product of:
          0.030856274 = sum of:
            0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030856274 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  19. Diepeveen, C.; Fassbender, J.; Robertson, M.: Indexing software (2007) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Mulvany, N.C.: Indexing books (2005) 0.01
    0.0059878635 = product of:
      0.011975727 = sum of:
        0.011975727 = product of:
          0.023951454 = sum of:
            0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023951454 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.4, S.160-162 (C. Jacobs): "This update maintains the place of Mulvany's 1994 work as an essential indexing resource. Addressed to indexers, authors and editors, it provides a thorough introduction to the field of back-of-the-book indexing, while providing context and direction for dealing with some of the more arcane problems that can arise. Book indexers must analyze text rapidly and organize the "map" that they are creating in a manner that fits the anticipated cognitive patterns of potential readers, is internally consistent and corresponds to standards. Intuition, high-level analytical skills, pattern-recognition abilities, commonsense and the ability to communicate the big picture as well as the details in few words are signs of a gifted indexer. Thus, it makes sense that Nancy Mulvany's conviction that indexers are born, not made, underlies the purpose and structure of Indexing Books. Consequently, this is a book that focuses on best practices and acceptable options, not on specializations. While it provides contexts and procedures for the practice of indexing so that individuals new to the field may use it as a textbook, it goes beyond this to suggest avenues and resources for decisionmaking. Established professionals as well as students will therefore find it useful. Mulvany speaks directly to the readers, engaging them with the material; her philosophy comes through clearly. Mulvany refers extensively to current authorities throughout, linking practice to ISO standards, the British standard, NISO guidelines, AACR2R, the Chicago Manual of Style, as well as to more specialized resources. Citations have been meticulously updated and references to the latest research and discussions included. ..."