Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.10 
    0.097466566 = product of:
  0.19493313 = sum of:
    0.17108186 = weight(_text_:van in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17108186 = score(doc=2474,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.6970737 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
    0.023851277 = product of:
      0.047702555 = sum of:
        0.047702555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047702555 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  2. Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998) 0.03 
    0.03312531 = product of:
  0.06625062 = sum of:
    0.049094375 = weight(_text_:j in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049094375 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
    0.017156245 = product of:
      0.03431249 = sum of:
        0.03431249 = weight(_text_:der in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03431249 = score(doc=3066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vortrag auf der 20. Online-Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, 5.-7.5.1998. Session 3: WWW-Suchmaschinen
  3. Hasubick, J.; Wiesenmüller, H.: RVK-Registerbegriffe in der Katalogrecherche : Chancen und Grenzen (2022) 0.03 
    0.026798803 = product of:
  0.053597607 = sum of:
    0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029456628 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
    0.024140978 = product of:
      0.048281956 = sum of:
        0.048281956 = weight(_text_:der in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048281956 = score(doc=538,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4911232 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Registerbegriffe der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden bisher in der Regel nur für die Suche nach passenden Systemstellen verwendet. Die vor einigen Jahren erfolgte Verknüpfung der RVK mit der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und die Aufbereitung der RVK als Normdatei lassen es jedoch denkbar erscheinen, die Registerbegriffe auch im Rahmen der Katalogrecherche zu nutzen - insbesondere für weiterführende und explorierende Recherchen im Anschluss an eine "known-item search". Der Aufsatz stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie zu einer möglichen Einbindung von RVK-Registerbegriffen in die Katalogrecherche am Beispiel des K10plus vor. Dabei wurde für Notationsstichproben aus fünf Fachsystematiken sowohl der quantitative als auch der qualitative Mehrwert einer Recherche mit entsprechenden Registerbegriffen ermittelt. Es ergaben sich drei Kategorien von Notationen und ihren Registereinträgen: eindeutig geeignete, eindeutig nicht geeignete und ein großer Teil von Fällen, die nur nach umfassenden Vorarbeiten sinnvoll eingebunden werden könnten. Die herausgearbeiteten Fall-Cluster geben einen Überblick über die Chancen und Grenzen einer möglichen Einbindung der RVK-Registerbegriffe in die Katalogrecherche.
  4. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.02 
    0.016223006 = product of:
  0.064892024 = sum of:
    0.064892024 = sum of:
      0.029115114 = weight(_text_:der in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029115114 = score(doc=4189,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044010527 = queryNorm
          0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035776913 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044010527 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  5. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.01 
    0.012273594 = product of:
  0.049094375 = sum of:
    0.049094375 = weight(_text_:j in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049094375 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Denton, W.: Putting facets on the Web : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01 
    0.009451026 = product of:
  0.037804104 = sum of:
    0.037804104 = weight(_text_:van in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037804104 = score(doc=2467,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.15403298 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Consider movie listings in newspapers. Most Canadian newspapers list movie showtimes in two large blocks, for the two major theatre chains. The listings are ordered by region (in large cities), then theatre, then movie, and finally by showtime. Anyone wondering where and when a particular movie is playing must scan the complete listings. Determining what movies are playing in the next half hour is very difficult. When movie listings went onto the web, most sites used a simple faceted organization, always with movie name and theatre, and perhaps with region or neighbourhood (thankfully, theatre chains were left out). They make it easy to pick a theatre and see what movies are playing there, or to pick a movie and see what theatres are showing it. To complete the system, the sites should allow users to browse by neighbourhood and showtime, and to order the results in any way they desired. Thus could people easily find answers to such questions as, "Where is the new James Bond movie playing?" "What's showing at the Roxy tonight?" "I'm going to be out in in Little Finland this afternoon with three hours to kill starting at 2 ... is anything interesting playing?" A hypertext, faceted classification system makes more useful information more easily available to the user. Reading the books and articles below in chronological order will show a certain progression: suggestions that faceting and hypertext might work well, confidence that facets would work well if only someone would make such a system, and finally the beginning of serious work on actually designing, building, and testing faceted web sites. There is a solid basis of how to make faceted classifications (see Vickery in Recommended), but their application online is just starting. Work on XFML (see Van Dijck's work in Recommended) the Exchangeable Faceted Metadata Language, will make this easier. If it follows previous patterns, parts of the Internet community will embrace the idea and make open source software available for others to reuse. It will be particularly beneficial if professionals in both information studies and computer science can work together to build working systems, standards, and code. Each can benefit from the other's expertise in what can be a very complicated and technical area. One particularly nice thing about this area of research is that people interested in combining facets and the web often have web sites where they post their writings.
  7. Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.008591516 = product of:
  0.034366064 = sum of:
    0.034366064 = weight(_text_:j in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034366064 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Editor
    Voss, J.
  8. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01 
    0.007453524 = product of:
  0.029814096 = sum of:
    0.029814096 = product of:
      0.059628192 = sum of:
        0.059628192 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059628192 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  9. Pika, J.: Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich : a Swiss perspective (2007) 0.01 
    0.007364157 = product of:
  0.029456628 = sum of:
    0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029456628 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044010527 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Braune-Egloff, D.: Integration der klassifikatorischen Suche in den Online-Katalog der FU Berlin, http://opac.fu-berlin.de : Nachtrag zur Präsentation in Krems am 23.09.2008 (2008) 0.01 
    0.005146874 = product of:
  0.020587496 = sum of:
    0.020587496 = product of:
      0.041174993 = sum of:
        0.041174993 = weight(_text_:der in 6866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041174993 = score(doc=6866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 6866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  11. Svensson, L.G.: Integrating browsing over DDC notations in library portals (2007) 0.01 
    0.005146874 = product of:
  0.020587496 = sum of:
    0.020587496 = product of:
      0.041174993 = sum of:
        0.041174993 = weight(_text_:der in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041174993 = score(doc=111,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vortrag während der EDUG-Konferenz der European DDC users' group am 11.06.2007 in Bern.
  12. Geißelmann, F.: ¬Die Online-Version der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (1997) 0.00 
    0.004245954 = product of:
  0.016983816 = sum of:
    0.016983816 = product of:
      0.033967633 = sum of:
        0.033967633 = weight(_text_:der in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033967633 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.00 
    0.002573437 = product of:
  0.010293748 = sum of:
    0.010293748 = product of:
      0.020587496 = sum of:
        0.020587496 = weight(_text_:der in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020587496 = score(doc=942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Der Workshop gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Forschung und Entwicklung zur Wissensorganisation in digitalen Bibliotheken. Diane Vizine-Goetz vom OCLC Office of Research in Dublin, Ohio, stellt die Forschungsprojekte von OCLC zur Anpassung und Weiterentwicklung der Dewey Decimal Classification als Wissensorganisationsinstrument fuer grosse digitale Dokumentensammlungen vor. Traugott Koch, NetLab, Universität Lund in Schweden, demonstriert die Ansätze und Lösungen des EU-Projekts DESIRE zum Einsatz von intellektueller und vor allem automatischer Klassifikation in Fachinformationsdiensten im Internet.
  14. Panzer, M.: Towards the "webification" of controlled subject vocabulary : a case study involving the Dewey Decimal Classification (2007) 0.00 
    0.002122977 = product of:
  0.008491908 = sum of:
    0.008491908 = product of:
      0.016983816 = sum of:
        0.016983816 = weight(_text_:der in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016983816 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes