-
Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000)
0.04
0.043560322 = product of:
0.13068096 = sum of:
0.13068096 = sum of:
0.09432047 = weight(_text_:i in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09432047 = score(doc=917,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.55909014 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.0363605 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0363605 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Huvila, I.: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web (2010)
0.03
0.0342987 = product of:
0.051448047 = sum of:
0.026842235 = product of:
0.05368447 = sum of:
0.05368447 = weight(_text_:t in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05368447 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024605814 = product of:
0.04921163 = sum of:
0.04921163 = weight(_text_:i in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04921163 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Vuong, T.; Saastamoinen, M.; Jacucci, G.; Ruotsalo, T.: Understanding user behavior in naturalistic information search tasks (2019)
0.03
0.029793557 = product of:
0.044690333 = sum of:
0.02711475 = product of:
0.0542295 = sum of:
0.0542295 = weight(_text_:t in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0542295 = score(doc=5419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01757558 = product of:
0.03515116 = sum of:
0.03515116 = weight(_text_:i in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03515116 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Understanding users' search behavior has largely relied on the information available from search engine logs, which provide limited information about the contextual factors affecting users' behavior. Consequently, questions such as how users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the users' tasks affect search behavior, as well as what triggers information needs, remain largely unanswered. We report an experiment in which naturalistic information search behavior was captured by analyzing 24/7 continuous recordings of information on participants' computer screens. Written task diaries describing the participants' tasks were collected and used as real-life task contexts for further categorization. All search tasks were extracted and classified under various task categories according to users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the tasks. We investigated the effect of different task categories on three behavioral factors: search efforts, content-triggers, and application context. Our results suggest four findings: (i) Search activity is integrally associated with the users' creative processes. The content users have seen prior to searching more often triggers search, and is used as a query, within creative tasks. (ii) Searching within intellectual and creative tasks is more time-intensive, while search activity occurring as a part of daily routine tasks is associated with more frequent searching within a search task. (iii) Searching is more often induced from utility applications in tasks demanding a degree of intellectual effort. (iv) Users' leisure information-seeking activity is occurring inherently within social media services or comes from social communication platforms. The implications of our findings for information access and management systems are discussed.
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.; Chamis, A.Y.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.1: Background and methodology (1988)
0.03
0.029398886 = product of:
0.04409833 = sum of:
0.02300763 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = weight(_text_:t in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04601526 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0210907 = product of:
0.0421814 = sum of:
0.0421814 = weight(_text_:i in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0421814 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life a situation as possible related to: (i) user context of questions in information retrieval; (ii) the structure and classification of questions; (iii) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (iv) different searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: part 1 presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Pt.2 is devoted to results related to users, questions, and effectiveness measures, and pt.3 to results related to searchers, searches, and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in pt.3
-
Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002)
0.03
0.027458586 = product of:
0.04118788 = sum of:
0.02300763 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = weight(_text_:t in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04601526 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01818025 = product of:
0.0363605 = sum of:
0.0363605 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0363605 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 2. 6.2005 10:34:22
-
Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003)
0.03
0.026670558 = product of:
0.08001167 = sum of:
0.08001167 = sum of:
0.049711253 = weight(_text_:i in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049711253 = score(doc=2117,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
0.030300418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030300418 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an application of the model described in Part I to the evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduates. The study observed how 36 undergraduate used four major search engines to find information for their own individual problems and how they evaluated these engines based an actual interaction with the search engines. User evaluation was based an 16 performance measures representing five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Non-performance (user-related) measures were also applied. Each participant searched his/ her own topic an all four engines and provided satisfaction ratings for system features and interaction and reasons for satisfaction. Each also made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her own information need and participated in post-search Interviews to provide reactions to the search results and overall performance. The study found significant differences in precision PR1 relative recall, user satisfaction with output display, time saving, value of search results, and overall performance among the four engines and also significant engine by discipline interactions an all these measures. In addition, the study found significant differences in user satisfaction with response time among four engines, and significant engine by discipline interaction in user satisfaction with search interface. None of the four search engines dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Content analysis of verbal data identified a number of user criteria and users evaluative comments based an these criteria. Results from both quantitative analysis and content analysis provide insight for system design and development, and useful feedback an strengths and weaknesses of search engines for system improvement
- Date
- 24. 1.2004 18:27:22
- Footnote
- Teil I im selben Heft
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998)
0.02
0.021817192 = product of:
0.06545158 = sum of:
0.06545158 = sum of:
0.03515116 = weight(_text_:i in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03515116 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.030300418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030300418 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.2: users, questions, and effectiveness (1988)
0.02
0.021691803 = product of:
0.065075405 = sum of:
0.065075405 = product of:
0.13015081 = sum of:
0.13015081 = weight(_text_:t in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13015081 = score(doc=3258,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.7386391 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- s. Abstract von T.1
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.3: searchers, searches, and overlap (1988)
0.02
0.021691803 = product of:
0.065075405 = sum of:
0.065075405 = product of:
0.13015081 = sum of:
0.13015081 = weight(_text_:t in 3259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13015081 = score(doc=3259,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.7386391 = fieldWeight in 3259, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3259)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- s. Abstract von T.1
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Investigation of search strategies in fiction based on an analysis of 134 user-librarian conversations (1979)
0.02
0.017894823 = product of:
0.05368447 = sum of:
0.05368447 = product of:
0.10736894 = sum of:
0.10736894 = weight(_text_:t in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10736894 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- IRFIS 3. Ed: T. Henriksen
-
Ewert, G.: Zur Benutzung von Katalogen und Lesesälen in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken. T.1-2 (1990)
0.02
0.017894823 = product of:
0.05368447 = sum of:
0.05368447 = product of:
0.10736894 = sum of:
0.10736894 = weight(_text_:t in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10736894 = score(doc=1587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Niyonsenga, T.; Bizimana, B.: Measures of library use and user satisfaction with academic library services (1996)
0.02
0.017894823 = product of:
0.05368447 = sum of:
0.05368447 = product of:
0.10736894 = sum of:
0.10736894 = weight(_text_:t in 6825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10736894 = score(doc=6825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 6825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999)
0.02
0.017453756 = product of:
0.052361265 = sum of:
0.052361265 = sum of:
0.028120931 = weight(_text_:i in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028120931 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.024240334 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024240334 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 8:51:28
-
Benutzerverhalten an deutschen Hoschschulbibliotheken : Ergebnisse einer mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft durchgeführten vergleichenden Untersuchung (Benutzerforschung I) (1979)
0.02
0.016403876 = product of:
0.04921163 = sum of:
0.04921163 = product of:
0.09842326 = sum of:
0.09842326 = weight(_text_:i in 4338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09842326 = score(doc=4338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Stachnik, I.: Benutzerbefragungen in Bibliotheken : Grundlagen, Methoden, Beispiele (1995)
0.02
0.016403876 = product of:
0.04921163 = sum of:
0.04921163 = product of:
0.09842326 = sum of:
0.09842326 = weight(_text_:i in 4363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09842326 = score(doc=4363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gattung, B.: Zur Analyse des Benutzerverhaltens. T.1 (1991)
0.02
0.01533842 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = product of:
0.09203052 = sum of:
0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09203052 = score(doc=2063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Dreis, G.: Zur Analyse des Benutzerverhaltens. T.2 (1991)
0.02
0.01533842 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = product of:
0.09203052 = sum of:
0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09203052 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991)
0.02
0.01533842 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = product of:
0.09203052 = sum of:
0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09203052 = score(doc=5105,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 42(1991) H.2, S.107-114. (T.1); 42(1991) H.3, S.177-190 (T.2)
-
Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001)
0.02
0.01533842 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = product of:
0.09203052 = sum of:
0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09203052 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users and real needs : a study and analysis of users queries on the Web (2000)
0.02
0.01533842 = product of:
0.04601526 = sum of:
0.04601526 = product of:
0.09203052 = sum of:
0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09203052 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.04472842 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
