Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.03
    0.027148746 = product of:
      0.054297492 = sum of:
        0.054297492 = product of:
          0.108594984 = sum of:
            0.108594984 = weight(_text_:o.g in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108594984 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37432942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.2901054 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    4. Vermutlich wird sich aufgrund der genannten Gründe der Buchservice Volltextsuche als heterogen darstellen: Einige Verlage werden gar nicht mitspielen, andere werden ein Buch im Vollzugriff, ein anderes nur zum Teil, ein drittes nur als Metainformation usw. indizieren lassen. Dies wird letztlich ebenfalls die Trefferqualität schmälern, da der Nutzer dann wiederum wissen muss, genau welche Informationen und Texte ihm bei seiner Suche vorenthalten werden. Das gedruckte Sachbuch wird gegen seinen eigenen digitalen Klon ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal brauchen, um weiterhin attraktiv zu sein. 5. Ein solches Alleinstellungsmerkmal würde m.E. maßgeblich durch die Erstellung von gedruckten Registern bereits in der Druckausgabe erreicht werden. Damit würde die Druckausgabe tatsächlich an Wert gewinnen und der Buchkäufer erhielte einen echten Mehrwert. Zum einen spiegelt sich bereits in der Erstellung konventioneller gedruckter Register die zweite digitale Revolution wider: Moderne Registererstellung basiert heutzutage ebenfalls auf der digitalen Verwertung des Volltextes. Zum anderen erfordert das "Registermachen" zugleich die Erbringung jener o.g. sachdienlichen Mehrinformationen wie Verweisungsbegriffe, vernünftige Klassifizierungen, nicht-redundante Begriffsauswahl etc., die nur begrenzt automatisierbar sind und Fachwissen erfordern. Erst diese beiden Komponenten lassen die Indexierung schlussendlich zu einer hochwertigen Aufbereitung sequentieller Information werden. 6. Genau diese Mehr- und Metainformationen, die die vorausgegangene Erstellung eines Print-Vollregisters geliefert hat, lassen sich dann in den Suchalgorithmus der Online-Suche zur Qualitätssteigerung der Treffer einrechnen."
  2. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02
    0.023178184 = product of:
      0.04635637 = sum of:
        0.04635637 = product of:
          0.09271274 = sum of:
            0.09271274 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09271274 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  3. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02
    0.023178184 = product of:
      0.04635637 = sum of:
        0.04635637 = product of:
          0.09271274 = sum of:
            0.09271274 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09271274 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  4. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02
    0.023178184 = product of:
      0.04635637 = sum of:
        0.04635637 = product of:
          0.09271274 = sum of:
            0.09271274 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09271274 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  5. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02
    0.023178184 = product of:
      0.04635637 = sum of:
        0.04635637 = product of:
          0.09271274 = sum of:
            0.09271274 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09271274 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  6. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  7. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  8. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  9. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  10. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  11. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  12. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  13. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  14. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02
    0.020280913 = product of:
      0.040561825 = sum of:
        0.040561825 = product of:
          0.08112365 = sum of:
            0.08112365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112365 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  15. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.02
    0.017383639 = product of:
      0.034767278 = sum of:
        0.034767278 = product of:
          0.069534555 = sum of:
            0.069534555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069534555 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  16. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.02
    0.017383639 = product of:
      0.034767278 = sum of:
        0.034767278 = product of:
          0.069534555 = sum of:
            0.069534555 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069534555 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02
    0.016389452 = product of:
      0.032778904 = sum of:
        0.032778904 = product of:
          0.06555781 = sum of:
            0.06555781 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06555781 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  18. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02
    0.016389452 = product of:
      0.032778904 = sum of:
        0.032778904 = product of:
          0.06555781 = sum of:
            0.06555781 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06555781 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  19. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01
    0.014486366 = product of:
      0.028972732 = sum of:
        0.028972732 = product of:
          0.057945464 = sum of:
            0.057945464 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057945464 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  20. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01
    0.011589092 = product of:
      0.023178184 = sum of:
        0.023178184 = product of:
          0.04635637 = sum of:
            0.04635637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04635637 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14976813 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042768538 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative