Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.04
    0.043514617 = product of:
      0.08702923 = sum of:
        0.08702923 = sum of:
          0.05629983 = weight(_text_:f in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05629983 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04536168 = queryNorm
              0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030729406 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04536168 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  2. Freistetter, F.: Warum jeder (fast) jeden kennt (2017) 0.02
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = product of:
          0.09554398 = sum of:
            0.09554398 = weight(_text_:f in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09554398 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Mayr, P.; Tosques, F.: Webometrische Analysen mit Hilfe der Google Web APIs (2005) 0.01
    0.0139334975 = product of:
      0.027866995 = sum of:
        0.027866995 = product of:
          0.05573399 = sum of:
            0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 3189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05573399 = score(doc=3189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.012291762 = product of:
      0.024583524 = sum of:
        0.024583524 = product of:
          0.04916705 = sum of:
            0.04916705 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04916705 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  5. Schael, F.: Wie lange wird Literatur nachgefragt? : Eine Untersuchung zu Alterung und Nutzung von Literatur (2003) 0.01
    0.011942998 = product of:
      0.023885995 = sum of:
        0.023885995 = product of:
          0.04777199 = sum of:
            0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04777199 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Rötzer, F.: Bindestriche in Titeln von Artikeln schaden der wissenschaftlichen Reputation (2019) 0.01
    0.011942998 = product of:
      0.023885995 = sum of:
        0.023885995 = product of:
          0.04777199 = sum of:
            0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04777199 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01
    0.010755292 = product of:
      0.021510584 = sum of:
        0.021510584 = product of:
          0.04302117 = sum of:
            0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04302117 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  8. Ufen, F.: ¬Das System als Roman : Eine Regelmäßigkeit der Worthäufigkeit passt bemerkenswerterweise auch auf Unternehmensgrößen und die Größe von Städten (2015) 0.01
    0.009952499 = product of:
      0.019904997 = sum of:
        0.019904997 = product of:
          0.039809994 = sum of:
            0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039809994 = score(doc=2050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.009218821 = product of:
      0.018437643 = sum of:
        0.018437643 = product of:
          0.036875285 = sum of:
            0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036875285 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  10. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.01
    0.009218821 = product of:
      0.018437643 = sum of:
        0.018437643 = product of:
          0.036875285 = sum of:
            0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036875285 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
  11. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.01
    0.009218821 = product of:
      0.018437643 = sum of:
        0.018437643 = product of:
          0.036875285 = sum of:
            0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036875285 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
  12. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.01
    0.007961999 = product of:
      0.015923997 = sum of:
        0.015923997 = product of:
          0.031847995 = sum of:
            0.031847995 = weight(_text_:f in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031847995 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Top Ten der meistzitierten Forscher nach Institutionen: Harvard - Stanford - UC, San Diego - MIT - National Cancer Institute - UC, San Francisco - Cornell - UC, Berkeley - University College, London - CalTech Top Ten der meistzitierten Forscher nach Ländern:USA - GB - BRD - CND - Japan - F - CH - S - I - AUS - AU
  13. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007) 0.01
    0.0076823514 = product of:
      0.015364703 = sum of:
        0.015364703 = product of:
          0.030729406 = sum of:
            0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030729406 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 19:22:21
  14. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.01
    0.006145881 = product of:
      0.012291762 = sum of:
        0.012291762 = product of:
          0.024583524 = sum of:
            0.024583524 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024583524 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]