-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.04
0.03664854 = product of:
0.07329708 = sum of:
0.07329708 = product of:
0.109945625 = sum of:
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.09919143 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09919143 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
- Type
- a
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.03
0.033366717 = product of:
0.066733435 = sum of:
0.066733435 = product of:
0.100100145 = sum of:
0.013307645 = weight(_text_:a in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013307645 = score(doc=2134,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.0867925 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0867925 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Type
- a
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.03
0.032067478 = product of:
0.064134955 = sum of:
0.064134955 = product of:
0.096202426 = sum of:
0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009409925 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.0867925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0867925 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Type
- a
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.03
0.032022886 = product of:
0.06404577 = sum of:
0.06404577 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00806565 = score(doc=2717,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Previous work an search-engine design has indicated that information-seekers may benefit from being given the opportunity to exploit multiple sources of evidence of document relatedness. Few existing systems, however, give users more than minimal control over the selections that may be made among methods of exploitation. By applying the methods of "document network analysis" (DNA), a unifying, graph-theoretic model of content-, collaboration-, and context-based systems (CCC) may be developed in which the nature of the similarities between types of document relatedness and document ranking are clarified. The usefulness of the approach to system design suggested by this model may be tested by constructing and evaluating a prototype system (UCXtra) that allows searchers to maintain control over the multiple ways in which document collections may be ranked and re-ranked.
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
- Type
- a
-
Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003)
0.03
0.0308417 = product of:
0.0616834 = sum of:
0.0616834 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.005703276 = weight(_text_:a in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005703276 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research an the use of mathematical, logical, and formal methods, has been central to Information Retrieval research for a long time. Research in this area is important not only because it helps enhancing retrieval effectiveness, but also because it helps clarifying the underlying concepts of Information Retrieval. In this article we outline some of the major aspects of the subject, and summarize the papers of this special issue with respect to how they relate to these aspects. We conclude by highlighting some directions of future research, which are needed to better understand the formal characteristics of Information Retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:36
- Type
- a
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.027486406 = product of:
0.054972813 = sum of:
0.054972813 = product of:
0.08245922 = sum of:
0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00806565 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.07439357 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07439357 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Type
- a
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.027486406 = product of:
0.054972813 = sum of:
0.054972813 = product of:
0.08245922 = sum of:
0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00806565 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.07439357 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07439357 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Type
- a
-
Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001)
0.03
0.027082413 = product of:
0.054164827 = sum of:
0.054164827 = sum of:
0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015652781 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.007514726 = weight(_text_:a in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007514726 = score(doc=1753,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997321 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book offers a comprehensive and consistent mathematical approach to information retrieval (IR) without which no implementation is possible, and sheds an entirely new light upon the structure of IR models. It contains the descriptions of all IR models in a unified formal style and language, along with examples for each, thus offering a comprehensive overview of them. The book also creates mathematical foundations and a consistent mathematical theory (including all mathematical results achieved so far) of IR as a stand-alone mathematical discipline, which thus can be read and taught independently. Also, the book contains all necessary mathematical knowledge on which IR relies, to help the reader avoid searching different sources. The book will be of interest to computer or information scientists, librarians, mathematicians, undergraduate students and researchers whose work involves information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:26:32
- Type
- m
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.02
0.024880055 = product of:
0.04976011 = sum of:
0.04976011 = product of:
0.07464016 = sum of:
0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02504445 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.02
0.020539759 = product of:
0.041079517 = sum of:
0.041079517 = product of:
0.061619274 = sum of:
0.012023562 = weight(_text_:a in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012023562 = score(doc=1422,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We propose a novel approach to incorporate term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval. The ability of the logic to handle expressive representations along with the use of such classical notions are promising characteristics for IR systems. The approach proposed here has been efficiently implemented and experiments against test collections are presented.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Type
- a
-
Wechsler, M.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The probability ranking principle revisited (2000)
0.02
0.020281035 = product of:
0.04056207 = sum of:
0.04056207 = product of:
0.060843103 = sum of:
0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0500889 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Liddy, E.D.; Diamond, T.; McKenna, M.: DR-LINK in TIPSTER (2000)
0.02
0.020281035 = product of:
0.04056207 = sum of:
0.04056207 = product of:
0.060843103 = sum of:
0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0500889 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.02
0.020116638 = product of:
0.040233277 = sum of:
0.040233277 = product of:
0.06034991 = sum of:
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=3499,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a survey and discussion on signature-based text retrieval methods. It describes the main idea behind the signature approach and its advantages over other text retrieval methods, it provides a classification of the signature methods that have appeared in the literature, it describes the main representatives of each class, together with the relative advantages and drawbacks, and it gives a list of applications as well as commercial or university prototypes that use the signature approach
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
- Type
- a
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.020116638 = product of:
0.040233277 = sum of:
0.040233277 = product of:
0.06034991 = sum of:
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=1431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Properties of a percentile-based rating scale needed in bibliometrics are formulated. Based on these properties, P100 was recently introduced as a new citation-rank approach (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Wang, 2013). In this paper, we conceptualize P100 and propose an improvement which we call P100'. Advantages and disadvantages of citation-rank indicators are noted.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Type
- a
-
MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004)
0.02
0.019066695 = product of:
0.03813339 = sum of:
0.03813339 = product of:
0.05720008 = sum of:
0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007604368 = score(doc=5108,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Aho, A.; Corasick, M.: Efficient string matching : an aid to bibliographic search (1975)
0.02
0.019045144 = product of:
0.03809029 = sum of:
0.03809029 = product of:
0.057135433 = sum of:
0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043827787 = score(doc=3506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
0.013307645 = weight(_text_:a in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013307645 = score(doc=3506,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Koyama, M.: ¬A fast retrieving algorithm of hierarchical relationships using tree structures (1998)
0.02
0.019045144 = product of:
0.03809029 = sum of:
0.03809029 = product of:
0.057135433 = sum of:
0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 6403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043827787 = score(doc=6403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6403)
0.013307645 = weight(_text_:a in 6403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013307645 = score(doc=6403,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6403, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6403)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Niemi, T.; Junkkari, M.; Järvelin, K.; Viita, S.: Advanced query language for manipulating complex entities (2004)
0.02
0.017745905 = product of:
0.03549181 = sum of:
0.03549181 = product of:
0.053237714 = sum of:
0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043827787 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009409925 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.02
0.017181829 = product of:
0.034363657 = sum of:
0.034363657 = product of:
0.051545486 = sum of:
0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008149235 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339625 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.02
0.017117187 = product of:
0.034234375 = sum of:
0.034234375 = product of:
0.05135156 = sum of:
0.007514726 = weight(_text_:a in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007514726 = score(doc=2591,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.043836832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043836832 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose In a system-based approach, replicating the web would require large test collections, and judging the relevancy of all documents per topic in creating relevance judgment through human assessors is infeasible. Due to the large amount of documents that requires judgment, there are possible errors introduced by human assessors because of disagreements. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study explores exponential variation and document ranking methods that generate a reliable set of relevance judgments (pseudo relevance judgments) to reduce human efforts. These methods overcome problems with large amounts of documents for judgment while avoiding human disagreement errors during the judgment process. This study utilizes two key factors: number of occurrences of each document per topic from all the system runs; and document rankings to generate the alternate methods. Findings The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated using the correlation coefficient of ranked systems using mean average precision scores between the original Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) relevance judgments and pseudo relevance judgments. The results suggest that the proposed document ranking method with a pool depth of 100 could be a reliable alternative to reduce human effort and disagreement errors involved in generating TREC-like relevance judgments. Originality/value Simple methods proposed in this study show improvement in the correlation coefficient in generating alternate relevance judgment without human assessors while contributing to information retrieval evaluation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Type
- a
