Search (78 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Bélair, J.-A.; Bourdon, F.; Mingam, M.: ¬Le Répertoire de vedettes-matière et RAMEAU : deux langages d'indexation en français : un luxe nécessaire (2005) 0.06 
    0.05724453 = product of:
  0.085866794 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.06741166 = product of:
      0.13482332 = sum of:
        0.13482332 = weight(_text_:de in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13482332 = score(doc=4359,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.69782525 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Deux langages d'indexation (le RVM Laval et Rameau) pour une seule langue (le français) : n'y a-t-il pas là un paradoxe et, d'une certaine manière, un luxe inutile ? Nous allons nous efforcer de démontrer le contraire en présentant les deux types de raisons qui expliquent cette nécessité, raisons d'ordre linguistique et culturel, d'une part, et raisons d'ordre administratif et de gestion, d'autre part. Cette autonomie assumée des deux langages ne signifie pas cependant qu'ils s'ignorent, tout au contraire. L'esprit de collaboration qui anime les deux institutions est soutenu par une coopération officialisée ainsi que par une coopération de tous les jours.
  2. Lorenz, B.; Steffens, M.: Systematik und Schlagwortnormdatei zwischen Universalität und Individualität (1997) 0.06 
    0.05713331 = product of:
  0.08569996 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
    0.04263798 = product of:
      0.08527596 = sum of:
        0.08527596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08527596 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    24. 5.2001 19:22:37
  3. Heijligers, T.; Pineda, I. de; Kasparova, N.T.; Rinn, R.; Tillett, B.; Witt, M.: Structures of corporate name headings : final report of the Working Group on the Revision of FSCH (IFLA Section on Cataloguing) (2001) 0.05 
    0.05108426 = product of:
  0.07662639 = sum of:
    0.030758556 = weight(_text_:m in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030758556 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.04586783 = product of:
      0.09173566 = sum of:
        0.09173566 = weight(_text_:de in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09173566 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  4. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.03 
    0.029387726 = product of:
  0.044081587 = sum of:
    0.012303422 = weight(_text_:m in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012303422 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
    0.031778164 = product of:
      0.06355633 = sum of:
        0.06355633 = weight(_text_:de in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06355633 = score(doc=2839,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.328958 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
    Ziel des DFG-Projekts ORCID DE ist es, die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen durch einen übergreifenden Ansatz nachhaltig zu unterstützen. Dabei stehen organisatorische, technische und rechtliche Fragen gleichermaßen im Fokus. Neben der Schaffung einer zentralen Anlaufstelle für Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen sind die Vernetzung und Verbreitung der ORCID im Bereich von Open-Access-Repositorien und -Publikationdiensten sowie die Verzahnung mit der Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND) wesentliche Aspekte des Projekts. Projektpartner von ORCID DE sind das Helmholtz Open Science Koordinationsbüro am Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld. Das Projekt wurde durch die Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert.
  5. Junger, U.; Schwens, U.: ¬Die inhaltliche Erschließung des schriftlichen kulturellen Erbes auf dem Weg in die Zukunft : Automatische Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2017) 0.03 
    0.025441177 = product of:
  0.07632353 = sum of:
    0.07632353 = sum of:
      0.04586783 = weight(_text_:de in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04586783 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
      0.030455703 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030455703 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    19. 8.2017 9:24:22
    Source
    http://www.dnb.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/DNB/inhaltserschliessung/automatischeInhaltserschliessung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  6. Hubrich, J.: Input und Output der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) : Aufwand zur Sicherstellung der Qualität und Möglichkeiten des Nutzens im OPAC (2005) 0.02 
    0.024485704 = product of:
  0.036728553 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
    0.01827342 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03654684 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    30. 1.2007 18:22:15
    Type
    m
  7. Scheven, E.: Qualitätssicherung in der GND (2021) 0.02 
    0.024485704 = product of:
  0.036728553 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
    0.01827342 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03654684 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    23. 9.2021 19:12:22
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  8. Rotaru, D.: Constituirea listei de vedete de subiect enciclopedice românesti (LIVES-RO) : Programul RAMEAU (2007) 0.02 
    0.021622304 = product of:
  0.06486691 = sum of:
    0.06486691 = product of:
      0.12973382 = sum of:
        0.12973382 = weight(_text_:de in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12973382 = score(doc=115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  9. Bourdon, F.: Modeliser les données d'autorité (2001) 0.02 
    0.021404987 = product of:
  0.06421496 = sum of:
    0.06421496 = product of:
      0.12842992 = sum of:
        0.12842992 = weight(_text_:de in 3937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12842992 = score(doc=3937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.66473395 = fieldWeight in 3937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3937)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 46(2001) no.5, S.117-119
  10. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.02 
    0.020404754 = product of:
  0.03060713 = sum of:
    0.015379278 = weight(_text_:m in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015379278 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
    0.015227851 = product of:
      0.030455703 = sum of:
        0.030455703 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030455703 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  11. Syren, A.P.: Cartographie des hommes illustres : vers une liste d'autorité des personalia (2000) 0.02 
    0.018347133 = product of:
  0.055041395 = sum of:
    0.055041395 = product of:
      0.11008279 = sum of:
        0.11008279 = weight(_text_:de in 3864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11008279 = score(doc=3864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 3864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 45(2000) no.2, S.87-91
  12. Figueroa-Servín, R.D.: Subject authority control at El Colegio de Mexico's Library : the whats and hows of a project (2001) 0.02 
    0.018347133 = product of:
  0.055041395 = sum of:
    0.055041395 = product of:
      0.11008279 = sum of:
        0.11008279 = weight(_text_:de in 5425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11008279 = score(doc=5425,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 5425, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the efforts at the Daniel Cosio Villegas Library of Colegio de Mexico (Mexico) to create a Spanish language authority file on its ALEPH online system. To date, the authorities team, composed of about ten librarians, have created over 10,000 name authorities, and close to 4,000 subject authorities in MARC format, closely following the structure of the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) records. For the subject authority file, it was decided to establish three levels of description, all of which include the LCSH English term. In order to establish the term in Spanish, seven official sources have been used, with Bilindex (1984) having the highest usage, closely followed by the subject headings list developed by Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) of Spain. As the first Mexican NACO/SACO participants, librarians at the Colegio de Mexico Library also received training by personnel from the Library of Congress in the creation and validation of subject headings.
  13. Kunz, M.: Von der nationalen zur internationalen Standardisierung (2001) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 6836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=6836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6836)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  14. Souza, R. de Mattos: ¬The representation of archival information in controlled vocabularies : the context of the archival institutions in Rio de Janeiro (2019) 0.01 
    0.013240903 = product of:
  0.039722707 = sum of:
    0.039722707 = product of:
      0.079445414 = sum of:
        0.079445414 = weight(_text_:de in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079445414 = score(doc=5490,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.4111975 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    We aim to trace the scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies as tools of research and work in the scope of representation and retrieval of information in institutions that have archival collections, in order to highlight the need for greater emphasis on the subject of representation of archival information in the academic field, increasing the visibility for the study and analysis of the collections in question and their contents, relevant to the information society. We investigate the current scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies in the archival collections of Rio de Janeiro, the theoretical-methodological changes arising from the impacts of information technologies on analysis, representation, such as classification and indexing, content retrieval, information needs in the contemporary world. The representation of information is associated with classification and retrieval of information to the organization of knowledge in information science. There is a gap in the archival area regarding the expression representation of information from the description of the nineteenth century. As for the theoretical-methodological aspect, there was a theoretical survey of the representation of information in publications in the interdisciplinary areas; as to the op-erational methodology, questionnaires were applied to information agencies on the use of controlled vocabularies, in relation to the treatment of information in archival collections. We conclude by demonstrating the importance of adopting the concept of information representation in archives, using controlled vocabularies associated with new information technologies and informational ecology, consolidating the area as a scientific and interdisciplinary field for information science.
  15. Virtuelle Normdatei (2008) 0.01 
    0.012973381 = product of:
  0.03892014 = sum of:
    0.03892014 = product of:
      0.07784028 = sum of:
        0.07784028 = weight(_text_:de in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07784028 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    "Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, die Bibliothèque nationale de France, die Library of Congress und das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) sind übereingekommen, gemeinsam den »Virtual International Authority File« (VIAF), eine Virtuelle Internationale Normdatei, aufzubauen und fortzuentwickeln. Die einzelnen Normdateien sollen im VIAF virtuell zu einem gemeinsamen Normdaten-Service integriert werden, der den Zugang zu den Namen aller einbezogenen Normdateien bietet. Die Vereinbarung baut auf einem vorausgegangenen Forschungsprojekt auf, in dem die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek gemeinsam mit der Library of Congress und OCLC durch die Zusammenführung ihrer Personennamendateien nachgewiesen haben, dass der Aufbau eines Virtual International Authority File auch unter den Bedingungen großer Datenbestände machbar ist. Mit der neuen Kooperationsvereinbarung stößt die Bibliothèque nationale de France hinzu, und der VIAF wird um die französischen Normdaten erweitert. Langfristig zielt das VIAF-Projekt darauf ab, die Normdateien möglichst vieler Bibliotheken zu einem globalen VIAF-Service zu integrieren, der für die Nutzer im Web weltweit frei zugänglich ist."
  16. Hartmann, S.; Pampel, H.: GND und ORCID : Brückenschlag zwischen zwei Systemen zur Autorenidentifikation (2017) 0.01 
    0.012973381 = product of:
  0.03892014 = sum of:
    0.03892014 = product of:
      0.07784028 = sum of:
        0.07784028 = weight(_text_:de in 5115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07784028 = score(doc=5115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 5115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Uneindeutigkeit von Personennamen erschwert im Rahmen der bibliothekarischen Erschließung die eindeutige Zuordnung von Autorinnen und Autoren zu ihren Werken. Bibliotheken im deutschsprachigen Raum adressieren das Problem der Mehrdeutigkeit von Namen durch den Einsatz der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND). Die internationale Initiative ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) verfolgt das gleiche Ziel. Akteur ist hier jedoch die einzelne Wissenschaftlerin oder der einzelne Wissenschaftler. Das Projekt "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" hat sich, dank der Förderung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), unter anderem zum Ziel gesetzt, einen Brückenschlag zwischen den beiden Systemen - GND und ORCID - zu schaffen, um damit die Datenqualität beider Systeme wechselseitig zu erhöhen. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über ORCID und das Projekt ORCID DE. Dabei wird insbesondere auf die angestrebte Verlinkung von GND und ORCID eingegangen.
  17. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.01 
    0.012771065 = product of:
  0.019156598 = sum of:
    0.007689639 = weight(_text_:m in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007689639 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.06873433 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
    0.011466958 = product of:
      0.022933915 = sum of:
        0.022933915 = weight(_text_:de in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022933915 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.11870249 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article presents an overview of the LEAF project (Linking and Exploring Authority Files)1, which has set out to provide a framework for international, collaborative work in the sector of authority data with respect to authority control. Elaborating the virtues of authority control in today's Web environment is an almost futile exercise, since so much has been said and written about it in the last few years.2 The World Wide Web is generally understood to be poorly structured-both with regard to content and to locating required information. Highly structured databases might be viewed as small islands of precision within this chaotic environment. Though the Web in general or any particular structured database would greatly benefit from increased authority control, it should be noted that our following considerations only refer to authority control with regard to databases of "memory institutions" (i.e., libraries, archives, and museums). Moreover, when talking about authority records, we exclusively refer to personal name authority records that describe a specific person. Although different types of authority records could indeed be used in similar ways to the ones presented in this article, discussing those different types is outside the scope of both the LEAF project and this article. Personal name authority records-as are all other "authorities"-are maintained as separate records and linked to various kinds of descriptive records. Name authority records are usually either kept in independent databases or in separate tables in the database containing the descriptive records. This practice points at a crucial benefit: by linking any number of descriptive records to an authorized name record, the records related to this entity are collocated in the database. Variant forms of the authorized name are referenced in the authority records and thus ensure the consistency of the database while enabling search and retrieval operations that produce accurate results. On one hand, authority control may be viewed as a positive prerequisite of a consistent catalogue; on the other, the creation of new authority records is a very time consuming and expensive undertaking. As a consequence, various models of providing access to existing authority records have emerged: the Library of Congress and the French National Library (Bibliothèque nationale de France), for example, make their authority records available to all via a web-based search service.3 In Germany, the Personal Name Authority File (PND, Personennamendatei4) maintained by the German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt/Main) offers a different approach to shared access: within a closed network, participating institutions have online access to their pooled data. The number of recent projects and initiatives that have addressed the issue of authority control in one way or another is considerable.5 Two important current initiatives should be mentioned here: The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF).
  18. Clavel-Merrin, G.: ¬Der Bedarf nach Kooperation bei Erarbeitung und Pflege mehrsprachiger Schlagwortnormdateien (1999) 0.01 
    0.012231421 = product of:
  0.036694262 = sum of:
    0.036694262 = product of:
      0.073388524 = sum of:
        0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073388524 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Aufgabe der Erabeitung, Verwaltung und Pflege mehrsprachiger Schlagwortnormdateien erfordert erheblich Mittel und sollte daher am besten in Kooperation erfolgen. 4 europäische Nationalbibliotheken (die Schweizerische Landesbibliothek, die Bibliothèque de France, Die Deutsche Bibliothek und die British Library) haben gemeinsam eine Machbarkeitsstudie über die Verknüpfung bestehender Schlagwortverzeichnisse in verschiedenen Sprachen erarbeitet, um einen mehrsprachigen Schlagwort-Zugang zu ihren Daten zu ermöglichen
  19. Voß, J.: Verbundzentrale des GBV übernimmt BARTOC (2020) 0.01 
    0.012231421 = product of:
  0.036694262 = sum of:
    0.036694262 = product of:
      0.073388524 = sum of:
        0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073388524 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Eine leicht ausführlichere Mitteilung auch unter https://coli-conc.gbv.de/de/blog/2020/11/04/bartoc/ (Deutsch) bzw. https://coli-conc.gbv.de/blog/2020/11/04/bartoc/ (Englisch)
  20. Bourdon, F.: Funktionale Anforderungen an bibliographische Datensätze und ein internationales Nummernsystem für Normdaten : wie weit kann Normierung durch Technik unterstützt werden? (2001) 0.01 
    0.01218228 = product of:
  0.03654684 = sum of:
    0.03654684 = product of:
      0.07309368 = sum of:
        0.07309368 = weight(_text_:22 in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07309368 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:30:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 64
  • el 16
  • m 4
  • b 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications