Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.03 
    0.032647606 = product of:
  0.048971407 = sum of:
    0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024606844 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
    0.02436456 = product of:
      0.04872912 = sum of:
        0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04872912 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  2. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.03 
    0.030529413 = product of:
  0.09158824 = sum of:
    0.09158824 = sum of:
      0.055041395 = weight(_text_:de in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055041395 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
      0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03654684 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  3. Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999) 0.02 
    0.023133418 = product of:
  0.034700125 = sum of:
    0.018646384 = weight(_text_:m in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018646384 = score(doc=6067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1666719 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
    0.01605374 = product of:
      0.03210748 = sum of:
        0.03210748 = weight(_text_:de in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03210748 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
  4. Beaulieu, M.; Gatford, M.; Jones, S.: Widening access to Okapi (2000) 0.02 
    0.020299612 = product of:
  0.060898833 = sum of:
    0.060898833 = weight(_text_:m in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060898833 = score(doc=3782,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.5443481 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  5. Darstellung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen im Rahmen des Semantic Web (2010) 0.02 
    0.01787949 = product of:
  0.026819233 = sum of:
    0.010765494 = weight(_text_:m in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010765494 = score(doc=4285,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.09622806 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
    0.01605374 = product of:
      0.03210748 = sum of:
        0.03210748 = weight(_text_:de in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03210748 = score(doc=4285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Um aus diesen beiden unabhangigen Systemen zur Inhaltserschlieung ein einheitliches, multilinguales Recherchevokabular zu bilden wurden im Rahmen des CrissCross Projekts unidirektionale Verbindungen von den einzelnen Sachschlagwortern der SWD zu den (teilweise) synthetisierten Notationen der DDC gescha en. Mittels dieser Verbindungen soll ein praziser und umfassender Zugang zu DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten uber SWD-Schlagworter gewahrleistet werden. Da DDC-Notationen aber eher ihre Entsprechung in einer Kombination aus Schlagwortfolge und Sachgruppe haben, kann dieses Mapping in der Regel nur von SWD in Richtung DDC ausgewertet werden ohne dass ein groerer Informationsverlust auftritt. Deshalb haben die erstellten Mappings immer eine spezielle Verknupfungsrichtung, bei der die SWD als Ausgangsvokabular und die DDC als Zielvokabular dient. Das Dokument startet in Abschnitt 2 mit einem Uberblick uber die vier verschiedenen CrissCross-Mappingrelationen. Diese Mappingrelationen sollen im Rahmen einer Erweiterung fur die SKOS-Spezi kation4 semantisch reprasentiert werden. SKOS soll dabei sowohl benutzt werden, um die Konzepthierarchien der SWD und der DDC darzustellen als auch um die Mappings zwischen den beiden zu reprasentieren. Anhand von zwei konkreten Beispielen wird in Abschnitt 3 genauer erklart, welche Probleme insbesondere bei der Abbildung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen mit Hilfe der SKOSSpezi kation auftreten. Insbesondere die Unidirektionalitat der ursprunglichen CrissCross-Mappings ist problematisch, da die in SKOS de nierten Mappingrelationen von einer Bidirektionalitat ausgehen. Das heit die Mappings mussen sowohl nutzbar sein fur die Suche in SWD-erschlossenen Bestanden als auch fur die Suche in DDC-erschlossenen Bestanden. Anhand der Beispiele in Abschnitt 3 wird deshalb auch eine initiale Losungsidee entwickelt, wie die Unidirektionalitat der CrissCross-Mappings aufgehoben werden kann.
  6. Leissler, M.; Hemmje, M: Portierung und Erweiterung der Relevanzkugelmetapher des LyberWorld-Werkzeuges um interaktive Informationsvisualisierungsmechanismen (1997) 0.02 
    0.017399667 = product of:
  0.052199 = sum of:
    0.052199 = weight(_text_:m in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052199 = score(doc=2386,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.46658412 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  7. Burkart, M.; Wersig, G.: Nutzung von Klassifikationssystemen in deutschen IuD-Stellen : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Winter 1980/81 (1981) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  8. Seeger, T.; Burkart, M.; Wersig, G.: IuD-Stellen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Repräsentativität einer Umfrage zur Nutzung von Klassifikationssystemen (1981) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  9. Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    m
  10. Walker, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: OKAPI at city : an evaluation facility for interactive IR (1991) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 2702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=2702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 2702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2702)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  11. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.: Klassifikationssysteme in Information und Dokumentation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1982) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  12. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.: Kombinatorischer Einsatz von Dokumentationssprachen : Bericht über eine Besuchs-Exploration (1982) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 3448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=3448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3448)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.: Perspektiven für Klassifikationssysteme in neueren Entwicklungen der Informationspraxis (1982) 0.02 
    0.016404564 = product of:
  0.04921369 = sum of:
    0.04921369 = weight(_text_:m in 3451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04921369 = score(doc=3451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3451)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  14. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.02 
    0.01624304 = product of:
  0.04872912 = sum of:
    0.04872912 = product of:
      0.09745824 = sum of:
        0.09745824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09745824 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  15. Burkart, M.; Wersig, G.: ¬Die Nutzung der DK in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Österreich : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Sommer 1981 im Auftrag der Gesellschaft für Information und Dokumentation (1982) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  16. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.; Blohm, W.: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Sommer 1981 : ¬Die Nutzung der DK in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Österreich (1982) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  17. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.: Entscheidungsdimensionen und -abläufe zum Einsatz von Klassifikationssystemen : Bericht über ein exploratives Experiment (1982) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  18. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.: Nutzung von Klassifikationssystemen in deutschen IuD-Stellen : Ergebnisse einer Umfage im Winter 1980/81 (1981) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  19. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Robertson, S.E.; Neilson, C.: Evaluation of online catalogues : an assessment of methods (1990) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  20. Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.; Keen, M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems : ASLIB Cranfield research project (1966) 0.01 
    0.014353992 = product of:
  0.043061975 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 5363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=5363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5363)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 39

Types

Themes