Search (377 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.15 
    0.14831573 = product of:
  0.22247359 = sum of:
    0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007963953 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.21450964 = sum of:
      0.110627785 = weight(_text_:de in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.110627785 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.10388186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10388186 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  2. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.09 
    0.08682048 = product of:
  0.13023072 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=4749,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
    0.12272224 = sum of:
      0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07375186 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
      0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048970375 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
    Type
    a
  3. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.08 
    0.07978211 = product of:
  0.11967316 = sum of:
    0.012291206 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012291206 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
    0.107381955 = sum of:
      0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064532876 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04284908 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  4. Garden, A.: ¬L'avenir des formats de données (2001) 0.07 
    0.06960209 = product of:
  0.10440312 = sum of:
    0.013139851 = weight(_text_:a in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013139851 = score(doc=4202,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
    0.09126327 = product of:
      0.18252654 = sum of:
        0.18252654 = weight(_text_:de in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18252654 = score(doc=4202,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.94007576 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 46(2001) no.5, S.114-116
    Type
    a
  5. Jolibois, S.: ¬La gestion informatisée de corpus bibliographiques : adaption des normes et formats documentaires (2000) 0.05 
    0.04788312 = product of:
  0.07182468 = sum of:
    0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066366266 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
    0.06518805 = product of:
      0.1303761 = sum of:
        0.1303761 = weight(_text_:de in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1303761 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 45(2000) no.1, S.98-101
    Type
    a
  6. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.05 
    0.047586318 = product of:
  0.071379475 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=4620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
    0.06387099 = product of:
      0.12774198 = sum of:
        0.12774198 = weight(_text_:de in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12774198 = score(doc=4620,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.657916 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Recommendations for exchange of single copy data in UNIMARC format: a reference document
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.180, S.132-133
    Type
    a
  7. Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997) 0.04 
    0.0426224 = product of:
  0.063933596 = sum of:
    0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008046483 = score(doc=915,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
    0.05588711 = product of:
      0.11177422 = sum of:
        0.11177422 = weight(_text_:de in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11177422 = score(doc=915,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The French National Library (NBF) has developed 2 new versions of INTERMARC, (A) and (B), to standardise cataloguing procedures and enrich bibliographic description and access. The bibliographic description format (B) accords with existing ISBD and can be used for all types of documents, allowing inclusion of specific characteristics and addition of new links. The format for editing records (A) eliminates redundancies and enriches links between fields. Both will be used as reference formats in the new Information System
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.38-40
    Type
    a
  8. Chachra, V.: Globalization and the Unicode standard (2001) 0.04 
    0.042185232 = product of:
  0.06327785 = sum of:
    0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007963953 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
    0.055313893 = product of:
      0.110627785 = sum of:
        0.110627785 = weight(_text_:de in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110627785 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Imprint
    Paris : Cité des sciences et de l'industrie
    Type
    a
  9. Duchemin, P.-Y.: BN OPALINE : the map database in the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale: history (1993) 0.04 
    0.040897615 = product of:
  0.06134642 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=916,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
    0.05215044 = product of:
      0.10430088 = sum of:
        0.10430088 = weight(_text_:de in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10430088 = score(doc=916,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Provides a brief history of the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris before going on to discuss the computerization of its collections. Describes the computer format for cartographic documents which the Department has developed, INTERMARC(C), which is an extension of INTERMARC, the French version of MARC. Then discusses BN-OPALINE, the Department's computerized system for cartographic materials, and its functionality. Finally looks to the future and the Department's hope to create a national union catalogue of cartographic documents
    Type
    a
  10. McCallum, S.: What makes a standard? (1996) 0.04 
    0.03977262 = product of:
  0.059658926 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
    0.05215044 = product of:
      0.10430088 = sum of:
        0.10430088 = weight(_text_:de in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10430088 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the characteristics of de jure standards developed by the formal standards organizations (ISO, ANSI, and NISO) and formal industry groups, and de facto standards developed by informal, self selected groups and companies. Compares this process with that used to develop Internet standards. Examines 3 key standards for the library community on this basis: standards that form the basis for encoding bibliographic data (MARC); standards for electronic documents (SGML-based), and standards for ordering and purchasing bibliographic items (EDIFACT-based)
    Type
    a
  11. Frias, J.A.: Revisiones, desarollo y perspectivas de la ISBD (1996) 0.04 
    0.036533482 = product of:
  0.054800224 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.04790324 = product of:
      0.09580648 = sum of:
        0.09580648 = weight(_text_:de in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09580648 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.493437 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    An examination of the chief developments over the last decade, covering the revisions of the standards for monographs (M), serials (S), cartographic materials (CM); and non-book materials (NBM) published in 1987; and revisions of antiquarian (A) and printed music (PM) standards published in 1991. The process of development of new standards for computer files (CF) and component parts (CP), and the creation of a concise version for mongraphy, is discussed in detail, in the overall perspective of illustrating why ISBD has gained international acceptance. The consultative process of creation and willingness to accomodate diverse cultural, linguistic and bibliographical traditions is the basis, together with universal recognition of the need for standardisation for conversion and use of computerised data. Future developments will focus on standardisation of exchange formats (MARC)
    Source
    Boletin de la Asociacion Andaluza de Bibliotecarios. 12(1996) no.45, S.19-43
    Type
    a
  12. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.03 
    0.034760237 = product of:
  0.052140355 = sum of:
    0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009291277 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
    0.04284908 = product of:
      0.08569816 = sum of:
        0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08569816 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
    Type
    a
  13. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.03 
    0.034760237 = product of:
  0.052140355 = sum of:
    0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009291277 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
    0.04284908 = product of:
      0.08569816 = sum of:
        0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08569816 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  14. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03 
    0.03175491 = product of:
  0.047632366 = sum of:
    0.01300508 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01300508 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.034627285 = product of:
      0.06925457 = sum of:
        0.06925457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06925457 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  15. Temmerman, P.: ISAD(G): de definitieve standaard? (1994) 0.03 
    0.030714607 = product of:
  0.04607191 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=7797,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=7797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Despite the extensive use of automation for archive management the creation of ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description) was only accepted in January 1992. A special adaptation of the ISBD had already enabled a start to be made on creating MARC format records for archive collections. ISAD(G) will facilitate the exchange of data among collections. Whether the new standard will be suitable for all forms of archive depends on the willingness of archivists to adopt new technology
    Type
    a
  16. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.03 
    0.03067321 = product of:
  0.046009813 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
    0.03911283 = product of:
      0.07822566 = sum of:
        0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07822566 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 43(1998) no.3, S.56-65
    Type
    a
  17. Recommandation 995 (1995) 0.03 
    0.029589612 = product of:
  0.044384416 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=4689,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Text of a document produced by the French Librarians Association, Federation of Library Software Users and the Association of Directors of Departmental Lending Libraries, setting out standards for local data included in bibliographic notices in UNIMARC format. These are specifically intended for loan copies sent from central to branch libraries, for integration into the local catalogue. The subfields (MARC field 995) are: origin of document; bar code; classification code and loan details; details of contents, support etc; and notes on physical features
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothécaires Français. 1995, no.169, S.120-126
    Type
    a
  18. International Seminar on the Creation and Use of Authority Files, St. Petersburg, Russia, 4-6 October 1995 (1996) 0.03 
    0.028123489 = product of:
  0.042185232 = sum of:
    0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053093014 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Papers of the following speakers: DANSKIN, A.: The Anglo-American Authority File: an idea whose time has come?; GUY, M.: The Bibliothèque Nationale de France and authority files: advances and perspectives in co-operation; KELM, B.: The Subject Authority File in Germany; McGARRY, D.: Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries; MURTOMAA, E.: Planning and creating name authority control: the Finnish experience
  19. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.03 
    0.028123489 = product of:
  0.042185232 = sum of:
    0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053093014 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.37
    Type
    a
  20. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.03 
    0.027705144 = product of:
  0.041557714 = sum of:
    0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009291277 = score(doc=892,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
    0.032266438 = product of:
      0.064532876 = sum of:
        0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064532876 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.68-72
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 19
  • el 14
  • s 11
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications