-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.08
0.07978211 = product of:
0.11967316 = sum of:
0.012291206 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012291206 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.107381955 = sum of:
0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064532876 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04284908 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
- Type
- a
-
Barrueco Cruz, J.M.; Krichel, T.: Subject description in the Academic Metadata Format (2003)
0.07
0.06588431 = product of:
0.09882645 = sum of:
0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066366266 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.092189826 = product of:
0.18437965 = sum of:
0.18437965 = weight(_text_:de in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18437965 = score(doc=3548,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
- Type
- a
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.04
0.039725985 = product of:
0.059588976 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.048970375 = product of:
0.09794075 = sum of:
0.09794075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794075 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Bekaert, J.; Van de Ville, D.; Rogge, B.; Strauven, I.; Kooning, E. de; Van de Walle, R.: Metadata-based access to multimedia architectural and historical archive collections : a review (2002)
0.04
0.03944398 = product of:
0.05916597 = sum of:
0.011262729 = weight(_text_:a in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011262729 = score(doc=689,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
0.04790324 = product of:
0.09580648 = sum of:
0.09580648 = weight(_text_:de in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09580648 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.493437 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This review is a summary of the state-of-the-art for those who have not been intimately dealing with the evolution of digital archives. At the same time this survey will be a useful resource and starting point for archivists, librarians and technicians, who are becoming involved in institutional digitization projects. It presents a brief overview of what is meant by a digital library and a digital archive, and how archival collections can be described. It expresses briefly the different approaches to collections and their descriptions and suggests that a consistent approach to descriptions at collection and item level is an important factor in initiatives which seek to provide integrated access to distributed resources, whether those resources are traditional or digital.
- Type
- a
-
Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007)
0.03
0.034801044 = product of:
0.05220156 = sum of:
0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065699257 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.045631636 = product of:
0.09126327 = sum of:
0.09126327 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09126327 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.03
0.034760237 = product of:
0.052140355 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.04284908 = product of:
0.08569816 = sum of:
0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08569816 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
- Type
- a
-
Andresen, L.: Standardisation of Dublin Core in Europe (2000)
0.03
0.033098765 = product of:
0.049648147 = sum of:
0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010535319 = score(doc=4454,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
0.03911283 = product of:
0.07822566 = sum of:
0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07822566 = score(doc=4454,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Dublin Core is developed in an open consensus building environment and has also succeeded in many countries and in many domains. The idea of Dublin Core was to establish a de facto standard for metadata for discovery. There is a natural development from de facto standards to formal standards. A very important detail of formal standardisation is the stability and the credibility of an official standard. That was the background for the metadata policy of The Danish National Library Authority, agreed upon in Dec 1997. We decided to work for a formal standardisation of Dublin Core. there was - and is - a need for standardised method of describing Internet resources. And at that time Dublin core seemed to be the best bid for a metadata schema. It was not very widely used in practice, but Dublin Core was what people were talking about
- Type
- a
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.03175491 = product of:
0.047632366 = sum of:
0.01300508 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01300508 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.034627285 = product of:
0.06925457 = sum of:
0.06925457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06925457 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
- Type
- a
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.02806764 = product of:
0.042101458 = sum of:
0.011494976 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011494976 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.030606484 = product of:
0.061212968 = sum of:
0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061212968 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.03
0.026661396 = product of:
0.039992094 = sum of:
0.009385608 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009385608 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.030606484 = product of:
0.061212968 = sum of:
0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061212968 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.026624393 = product of:
0.039936587 = sum of:
0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053093014 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.034627285 = product of:
0.06925457 = sum of:
0.06925457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06925457 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
- Type
- a
-
Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008)
0.03
0.02589091 = product of:
0.038836364 = sum of:
0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065699257 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.032266438 = product of:
0.064532876 = sum of:
0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064532876 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
- Source
- http://dc2008.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nkos.pdf
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.02
0.02482874 = product of:
0.03724311 = sum of:
0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066366266 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.030606484 = product of:
0.061212968 = sum of:
0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061212968 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Lagoze, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (2003)
0.02
0.024373945 = product of:
0.036560915 = sum of:
0.00890397 = weight(_text_:a in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00890397 = score(doc=4771,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
0.027656946 = product of:
0.055313893 = sum of:
0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055313893 = score(doc=4771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The authors, who jointly serve as the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) executive, reflect an the three-year history of the OAI. Three years of technical work recently culminated in the release of a stabie production version 2 of the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). This technical product, the work that led up to it, and the process that made it possible have attracted some favor from the digital library and information community. The paper explores a number of factors in the history of the OAI that the authors believe have contributed to this positive response. The factors include focus an a defined problem Statement, an operational model in which strong leadership is balanced with solicited participation, a healthy dose of community building and Support, and sensible technical decisions.
- Type
- a
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.02
0.0242381 = product of:
0.03635715 = sum of:
0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01187196 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Type
- a
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.02
0.023402527 = product of:
0.03510379 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
- Type
- a
-
Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998)
0.02
0.023402527 = product of:
0.03510379 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.02
0.023402527 = product of:
0.03510379 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
- Type
- a
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.02
0.023402527 = product of:
0.03510379 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
- Type
- a
-
Masanès, J.; Lupovici, C.: Preservation metadata : the NEDLIB's proposal Bibliothèque Nationale de France (2001)
0.02
0.023035955 = product of:
0.03455393 = sum of:
0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006896985 = score(doc=6013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
0.027656946 = product of:
0.055313893 = sum of:
0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055313893 = score(doc=6013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Preservation of digital documents for the long term requires above all to solve the problem of technological obsolescence. Accessing to digital documents in 20 or loo years will be impossible if we, or our successor, can't process the bit stream underlying digital documents. We can be sure that the modality of data processing will be different in 20 or loo years. It is then our task to collect key information about today's data processing to ensure future access to these documents. In this paper we present the NEDLIB's proposal for a preservation metadata set. This set gathers core metadata that are mandatory for preservation management purposes. We propose to define 8 metadata elements and 38 sub-elements following the OAIS taxonomy of information object. A layered information analysis of the digital document is proposed in order to list all information involved in the data processing of the bit stream. These metadata elements are intended to be populate, as much as possible, in an automatic way to make it possible to handle large amounts of documents
- Type
- a
