Search (297 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.08 
    0.07978211 = product of:
  0.11967316 = sum of:
    0.012291206 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012291206 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
    0.107381955 = sum of:
      0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064532876 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04284908 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  2. Barrueco Cruz, J.M.; Krichel, T.: Subject description in the Academic Metadata Format (2003) 0.07 
    0.06588431 = product of:
  0.09882645 = sum of:
    0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066366266 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
    0.092189826 = product of:
      0.18437965 = sum of:
        0.18437965 = weight(_text_:de in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18437965 = score(doc=3548,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
    Type
    a
  3. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.04 
    0.039725985 = product of:
  0.059588976 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
    0.048970375 = product of:
      0.09794075 = sum of:
        0.09794075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09794075 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Type
    a
  4. Bekaert, J.; Van de Ville, D.; Rogge, B.; Strauven, I.; Kooning, E. de; Van de Walle, R.: Metadata-based access to multimedia architectural and historical archive collections : a review (2002) 0.04 
    0.03944398 = product of:
  0.05916597 = sum of:
    0.011262729 = weight(_text_:a in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011262729 = score(doc=689,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
    0.04790324 = product of:
      0.09580648 = sum of:
        0.09580648 = weight(_text_:de in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09580648 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.493437 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This review is a summary of the state-of-the-art for those who have not been intimately dealing with the evolution of digital archives. At the same time this survey will be a useful resource and starting point for archivists, librarians and technicians, who are becoming involved in institutional digitization projects. It presents a brief overview of what is meant by a digital library and a digital archive, and how archival collections can be described. It expresses briefly the different approaches to collections and their descriptions and suggests that a consistent approach to descriptions at collection and item level is an important factor in initiatives which seek to provide integrated access to distributed resources, whether those resources are traditional or digital.
    Type
    a
  5. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.03 
    0.034801044 = product of:
  0.05220156 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
    0.045631636 = product of:
      0.09126327 = sum of:
        0.09126327 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09126327 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
  6. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.03 
    0.034760237 = product of:
  0.052140355 = sum of:
    0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009291277 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
    0.04284908 = product of:
      0.08569816 = sum of:
        0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08569816 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Type
    a
  7. Andresen, L.: Standardisation of Dublin Core in Europe (2000) 0.03 
    0.033098765 = product of:
  0.049648147 = sum of:
    0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010535319 = score(doc=4454,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
    0.03911283 = product of:
      0.07822566 = sum of:
        0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07822566 = score(doc=4454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is developed in an open consensus building environment and has also succeeded in many countries and in many domains. The idea of Dublin Core was to establish a de facto standard for metadata for discovery. There is a natural development from de facto standards to formal standards. A very important detail of formal standardisation is the stability and the credibility of an official standard. That was the background for the metadata policy of The Danish National Library Authority, agreed upon in Dec 1997. We decided to work for a formal standardisation of Dublin Core. there was - and is - a need for standardised method of describing Internet resources. And at that time Dublin core seemed to be the best bid for a metadata schema. It was not very widely used in practice, but Dublin Core was what people were talking about
    Type
    a
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03 
    0.03175491 = product of:
  0.047632366 = sum of:
    0.01300508 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01300508 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.034627285 = product of:
      0.06925457 = sum of:
        0.06925457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06925457 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  9. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.03 
    0.02589091 = product of:
  0.038836364 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.032266438 = product of:
      0.064532876 = sum of:
        0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064532876 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
    Source
    http://dc2008.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nkos.pdf
  10. Lagoze, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (2003) 0.02 
    0.024373945 = product of:
  0.036560915 = sum of:
    0.00890397 = weight(_text_:a in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00890397 = score(doc=4771,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=4771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The authors, who jointly serve as the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) executive, reflect an the three-year history of the OAI. Three years of technical work recently culminated in the release of a stabie production version 2 of the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). This technical product, the work that led up to it, and the process that made it possible have attracted some favor from the digital library and information community. The paper explores a number of factors in the history of the OAI that the authors believe have contributed to this positive response. The factors include focus an a defined problem Statement, an operational model in which strong leadership is balanced with solicited participation, a healthy dose of community building and Support, and sensible technical decisions.
    Type
    a
  11. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02 
    0.0242381 = product of:
  0.03635715 = sum of:
    0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01187196 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Type
    a
  12. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.02 
    0.023402527 = product of:
  0.03510379 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  13. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.02 
    0.023402527 = product of:
  0.03510379 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  14. Masanès, J.; Lupovici, C.: Preservation metadata : the NEDLIB's proposal Bibliothèque Nationale de France (2001) 0.02 
    0.023035955 = product of:
  0.03455393 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=6013,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=6013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Preservation of digital documents for the long term requires above all to solve the problem of technological obsolescence. Accessing to digital documents in 20 or loo years will be impossible if we, or our successor, can't process the bit stream underlying digital documents. We can be sure that the modality of data processing will be different in 20 or loo years. It is then our task to collect key information about today's data processing to ensure future access to these documents. In this paper we present the NEDLIB's proposal for a preservation metadata set. This set gathers core metadata that are mandatory for preservation management purposes. We propose to define 8 metadata elements and 38 sub-elements following the OAIS taxonomy of information object. A layered information analysis of the digital document is proposed in order to list all information involved in the data processing of the bit stream. These metadata elements are intended to be populate, as much as possible, in an automatic way to make it possible to handle large amounts of documents
    Type
    a
  15. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.02 
    0.022454113 = product of:
  0.03368117 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  16. Bueno-de-la-Fuente, G.; Hernández-Pérez, T.; Rodríguez-Mateos, D.; Méndez-Rodríguez, E.M.; Martín-Galán, B.: Study on the use of metadata for digital learning objects in University Institutional Repositories (MODERI) (2009) 0.02 
    0.022192208 = product of:
  0.03328831 = sum of:
    0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0056313644 = score(doc=2981,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=2981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a core issue for the creation of repositories. Different institutional repositories have chosen and use different metadata models, elements and values for describing the range of digital objects they store. Thus, this paper analyzes the current use of metadata describing those Learning Objects that some open higher educational institutions' repositories include in their collections. The goal of this work is to identify and analyze the different metadata models being used to describe educational features of those specific digital educational objects (such as audience, type of educational material, learning objectives, etc.). Also discussed is the concept and typology of Learning Objects (LO) through their use in University Repositories. We will also examine the usefulness of specifically describing those learning objects, setting them apart from other kind of documents included in the repository, mainly scholarly publications and research results of the Higher Education institution.
    Type
    a
  17. White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008) 0.02 
    0.021869322 = product of:
  0.032803982 = sum of:
    0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011379444 = score(doc=2592,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This report presents recent metadata developments for Dryad, a digital repository hosting datasets underlying publications in the field of evolutionary biology. We review our efforts to bring the Dryad application profile into conformance with the Singapore Framework and discuss practical issues underlying the application profile implementation in a DSpace environment. The report concludes by outlining the next steps planned as Dryad moves into the next phase of development.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a
  18. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
    Type
    a
  19. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  20. Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003) 0.02 
    0.021208337 = product of:
  0.031812504 = sum of:
    0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010387965 = score(doc=4772,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) was created as a practical way to promote interoperability between e-print repositories. Although the scope of the OAI has been broadened, e-print repositories still represent a significant fraction of OAI data providers. This article presents a brief survey of OAI e-print repositories, and of services using metadata harvested from e-print repositories using the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH). It then discusses several situations where metadata harvesting may be used to further improve the utility of e-print archives as a component of the scholarly communication infrastructure.
    Date
    18.12.2005 13:18:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 271
  • el 37
  • m 9
  • s 8
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications