-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.03
0.032666057 = product of:
0.065332115 = sum of:
0.065332115 = sum of:
0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021874432 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043457683 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.021728842 = product of:
0.043457683 = sum of:
0.043457683 = product of:
0.08691537 = sum of:
0.08691537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691537 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.01
0.012416481 = product of:
0.024832962 = sum of:
0.024832962 = product of:
0.049665924 = sum of:
0.049665924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049665924 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.01
0.009312361 = product of:
0.018624721 = sum of:
0.018624721 = product of:
0.037249442 = sum of:
0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037249442 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
-
Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002)
0.01
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = product of:
0.03124919 = sum of:
0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03124919 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Internet Professionell. 2002, H.9, S.66-71
-
Radev, D.; Fan, W.; Qu, H.; Wu, H.; Grewal, A.: Probabilistic question answering on the Web (2005)
0.01
0.006628954 = product of:
0.013257908 = sum of:
0.013257908 = product of:
0.026515815 = sum of:
0.026515815 = weight(_text_:h in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026515815 = score(doc=3455,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.01
0.006628954 = product of:
0.013257908 = sum of:
0.013257908 = product of:
0.026515815 = sum of:
0.026515815 = weight(_text_:h in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026515815 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
-
Chakrabarti, S.; Dom, B.; Kumar, S.R.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Tomkins, A.; Kleinberg, J.M.; Gibson, D.: Neue Pfade durch den Internet-Dschungel : Die zweite Generation von Web-Suchmaschinen (1999)
0.01
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = product of:
0.02499935 = sum of:
0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02499935 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1999, H.8, S.44-49
-
Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019)
0.01
0.005468608 = product of:
0.010937216 = sum of:
0.010937216 = product of:
0.021874432 = sum of:
0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021874432 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 70(2019) H.1, S.14-23
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001)
0.00
0.004687378 = product of:
0.009374756 = sum of:
0.009374756 = product of:
0.018749513 = sum of:
0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018749513 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2001, H.2, S.20-27
-
Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Langville, A.N.; Meyer, C.D.: Google's PageRank and beyond : the science of search engine rankings (2006)
0.00
0.003314477 = product of:
0.006628954 = sum of:
0.006628954 = product of:
0.013257908 = sum of:
0.013257908 = weight(_text_:h in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013257908 = score(doc=6,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.11645855 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: Chapter 1. Introduction to Web Search Engines: 1.1 A Short History of Information Retrieval - 1.2 An Overview of Traditional Information Retrieval - 1.3 Web Information Retrieval Chapter 2. Crawling, Indexing, and Query Processing: 2.1 Crawling - 2.2 The Content Index - 2.3 Query Processing Chapter 3. Ranking Webpages by Popularity: 3.1 The Scene in 1998 - 3.2 Two Theses - 3.3 Query-Independence Chapter 4. The Mathematics of Google's PageRank: 4.1 The Original Summation Formula for PageRank - 4.2 Matrix Representation of the Summation Equations - 4.3 Problems with the Iterative Process - 4.4 A Little Markov Chain Theory - 4.5 Early Adjustments to the Basic Model - 4.6 Computation of the PageRank Vector - 4.7 Theorem and Proof for Spectrum of the Google Matrix Chapter 5. Parameters in the PageRank Model: 5.1 The a Factor - 5.2 The Hyperlink Matrix H - 5.3 The Teleportation Matrix E Chapter 6. The Sensitivity of PageRank; 6.1 Sensitivity with respect to alpha - 6.2 Sensitivity with respect to H - 6.3 Sensitivity with respect to vT - 6.4 Other Analyses of Sensitivity - 6.5 Sensitivity Theorems and Proofs Chapter 7. The PageRank Problem as a Linear System: 7.1 Properties of (I - alphaS) - 7.2 Properties of (I - alphaH) - 7.3 Proof of the PageRank Sparse Linear System Chapter 8. Issues in Large-Scale Implementation of PageRank: 8.1 Storage Issues - 8.2 Convergence Criterion - 8.3 Accuracy - 8.4 Dangling Nodes - 8.5 Back Button Modeling
-
Lanvent, A.: Licht im Daten Chaos (2004)
0.00
0.0031249188 = product of:
0.0062498376 = sum of:
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = weight(_text_:h in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012499675 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- PC professionell. 2004, H.10, S.128-137
