Search (513 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.04
    0.04193744 = product of:
      0.08387488 = sum of:
        0.08387488 = sum of:
          0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009313605 = score(doc=1953,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496453 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049596746 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
    Type
    a
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.04
    0.036649305 = product of:
      0.07329861 = sum of:
        0.07329861 = product of:
          0.10994791 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
            0.09919349 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09919349 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Type
    a
  3. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.03
    0.03206814 = product of:
      0.06413628 = sum of:
        0.06413628 = product of:
          0.09620442 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
            0.0867943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867943 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Type
    a
  4. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.03
    0.028614223 = product of:
      0.057228446 = sum of:
        0.057228446 = sum of:
          0.010627648 = weight(_text_:a in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010627648 = score(doc=4218,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015602832 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030997967 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
    Type
    a
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03
    0.027770607 = product of:
      0.055541214 = sum of:
        0.055541214 = product of:
          0.08331182 = sum of:
            0.013171425 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013171425 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
            0.07014039 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07014039 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  6. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.03
    0.025172535 = product of:
      0.05034507 = sum of:
        0.05034507 = product of:
          0.0755176 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
            0.07014039 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07014039 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a
  7. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.02454598 = product of:
      0.04909196 = sum of:
        0.04909196 = product of:
          0.07363794 = sum of:
            0.011642005 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011642005 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
            0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061995935 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  8. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.02
    0.023833863 = product of:
      0.047667727 = sum of:
        0.047667727 = product of:
          0.07150159 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
            0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061995935 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  9. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.02
    0.022905817 = product of:
      0.045811635 = sum of:
        0.045811635 = product of:
          0.06871745 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
            0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061995935 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  10. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.02
    0.021646272 = product of:
      0.043292545 = sum of:
        0.043292545 = sum of:
          0.0060119056 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0060119056 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012482265 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.024798373 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024798373 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
    Type
    a
  11. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02
    0.020540185 = product of:
      0.04108037 = sum of:
        0.04108037 = product of:
          0.061620556 = sum of:
            0.012023811 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012023811 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Type
    a
  12. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  13. Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Type
    a
  14. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
    Type
    a
  15. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.02
    0.020117057 = product of:
      0.040234115 = sum of:
        0.040234115 = product of:
          0.06035117 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  16. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.02
    0.019636784 = product of:
      0.039273567 = sum of:
        0.039273567 = product of:
          0.05891035 = sum of:
            0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313605 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
    Type
    a
  17. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.019636784 = product of:
      0.039273567 = sum of:
        0.039273567 = product of:
          0.05891035 = sum of:
            0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313605 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  18. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
    Type
    a
  19. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=903,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
    Type
    a
  20. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Years

Types

  • a 469
  • el 66
  • m 19
  • s 13
  • n 3
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects