-
as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001)
0.05
0.049961556 = product of:
0.09992311 = sum of:
0.09992311 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031205663 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061995935 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2003 11:06:22
- Source
- CD-Info. 2001, H.6, S.98-100
- Type
- a
-
Schröder, A.: Web der Zukunft : RDF - Der erste Schritt zum semantischen Web
0.04
0.0410829 = product of:
0.0821658 = sum of:
0.0821658 = sum of:
0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007604526 = score(doc=1457,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden.
- Source
- XML Magazin und Web Services. 2003, H.1, S.40-43
- Type
- a
-
Patrick, D.A.: XML in der Praxis : Unternehmensübergreifende Vorteile durch Enterprise Content Management (1999)
0.03
0.034973085 = product of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.06994617 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2003 10:50:22
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.1, S.5-12
- Type
- a
-
Mintert, S.; Wilde, E.; Behme, H.: Auszeichnend : Editoren für Extensible Markup Language (2002)
0.02
0.020341193 = product of:
0.040682387 = sum of:
0.040682387 = product of:
0.061023578 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052957762 = score(doc=4759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- iX. 2002, H.8, S.52-58
- Type
- a
-
Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004)
0.02
0.018307384 = product of:
0.03661477 = sum of:
0.03661477 = product of:
0.05492215 = sum of:
0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011524997 = score(doc=2538,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339715 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:39:22
- Type
- a
-
Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000)
0.01
0.014727588 = product of:
0.029455176 = sum of:
0.029455176 = product of:
0.044182763 = sum of:
0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006985203 = score(doc=720,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The flexibility and extensibility of XML have largely contributed to its wide acceptance beyond the traditional realm of SGML. Yet, there is still one more obstacle to be overcome before XML is able to become the evangelized universal data/document format. The obstacle is posed by the limitations of the legacy standard for constraining the contents of an XML document. The traditionally used DTD (document type definition) format does not lend itself to be used in the wide variety of applications XML is capable of handling. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has charged the XML schema working group with the task of developing a schema language to replace DTD. This XML schema language is evolving based on early drafts of XML schema languages. Each one of these early efforts adopted a slightly different approach, but all of them were moving in the same direction.
- Date
- 28. 1.2006 19:01:22
- Type
- a
-
Bold, M.: ¬Die Zukunft des Web : Standards für das Web der Zukunft (2004)
0.01
0.012642393 = product of:
0.025284786 = sum of:
0.025284786 = product of:
0.037927177 = sum of:
0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067215143 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031205663 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Internet Professionell. 2004, H.4, S.32-36
- Type
- a
-
Vonhoegen, H.: Einstieg in XML (2002)
0.01
0.01238153 = product of:
0.02476306 = sum of:
0.02476306 = product of:
0.03714459 = sum of:
0.015446015 = weight(_text_:h in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015446015 = score(doc=4002,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.021698575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021698575 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: XML Magazin und Web Services 2003, H.1, S.14 (S. Meyen): "Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden. Schlägt man das Buch auf und beginnt, im EinleitungsKapitel zu schmökern, fällt sogleich ins Auge, dass der Leser nicht mit Lektionen im Stile von "bei XML sind die spitzen Klammern ganz wichtig" belehrt wird, obgleich es sich um ein Buch für Anfänger handelt. Im Gegenteil: Es geht gleich zur Sache und eine gesunde Mischung an Vorkenntnissen wird vorausgesetzt. Wer sich heute für XML interessiert, der hat ja mit 99-prozentiger Wahrscheinlichkeit schon seine einschlägigen Erfahrungen mit HTML und dem Web gemacht und ist kein Newbie in dem Reich der spitzen Klammern und der (einigermaßen) wohlformatierten Dokumente. Und hier liegt eine deutliche Stärke des Werkes Helmut Vonhoegens, der seinen Einsteiger-Leser recht gut einzuschätzen weiß und ihn daher praxisnah und verständlich ans Thema heranführt. Das dritte Kapitel beschäftigt sich mit der Document Type Definition (DTD) und beschreibt deren Einsatzziele und Verwendungsweisen. Doch betont der Autor hier unablässig die Begrenztheit dieses Ansatzes, welche den Ruf nach einem neuen Konzept deutlich macht: XML Schema, welches er im folgenden Kapitel darstellt. Ein recht ausführliches Kapitel widmet sich dann dem relativ aktuellen XML Schema-Konzept und erläutert dessen Vorzüge gegenüber der DTD (Modellierung komplexer Datenstrukturen, Unterstützung zahlreicher Datentypen, Zeichenbegrenzungen u.v.m.). XML Schema legt, so erfährt der Leser, wie die alte DTD, das Vokabular und die zulässige Grammatik eines XML-Dokuments fest, ist aber seinerseits ebenfalls ein XML-Dokument und kann (bzw. sollte) wie jedes andere XML auf Wohlgeformtheit überprüft werden. Weitere Kapitel behandeln die Navigations-Standards XPath, XLink und XPointer, Transformationen mit XSLT und XSL und natürlich die XML-Programmierschnittstellen DOM und SAX. Dabei kommen verschiedene Implementierungen zum Einsatz und erfreulicherweise werden Microsoft-Ansätze auf der einen und Java/Apache-Projekte auf der anderen Seite in ungefähr vergleichbarem Umfang vorgestellt. Im letzten Kapitel schließlich behandelt Vonhoegen die obligatorischen Web Services ("Webdienste") als Anwendungsfall von XML und demonstriert ein kleines C#- und ASP-basiertes Beispiel (das Java-Äquivalent mit Apache Axis fehlt leider). "Einstieg in XML" präsentiert seinen Stoff in klar verständlicher Form und versteht es, seine Leser auf einem guten Niveau "abzuholen". Es bietet einen guten Überblick über die Grundlagen von XML und kann - zumindest derzeit noch - mit recht hoher Aktualität aufwarten."
-
Geeb, F.: Lexikographische Informationsstrukturierung mit XML (2003)
0.01
0.010113914 = product of:
0.020227827 = sum of:
0.020227827 = product of:
0.03034174 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.7, S.415-420
- Type
- a
-
Barthelmes, C.: Darstellungsmöglichkeiten von Musik mithilfe ausgewählter Musikbeschreibungssprachen (2003)
0.01
0.0063211964 = product of:
0.012642393 = sum of:
0.012642393 = product of:
0.018963588 = sum of:
0.0033607571 = weight(_text_:a in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033607571 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015602832 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.6, S.349-356
- Type
- a
-
Bach, M.: XSL und XPath - verständlich und praxisnah : Transformation und Ausgabe vom XML-Dokumenten mit XSL (2000)
0.01
0.005200944 = product of:
0.010401888 = sum of:
0.010401888 = product of:
0.031205663 = sum of:
0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 6259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031205663 = score(doc=6259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 6259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6259)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez .in: iX 2001, H.6, S.185 (S. Schröter)
-
Michel, T.F.: XML kompakt : Eine praktische Einführung (1999)
0.00
0.0041607553 = product of:
0.008321511 = sum of:
0.008321511 = product of:
0.02496453 = sum of:
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: nfd 51(2000) H.2, S.124 (M. Ockenfeld)
-
Anderson, R.; Birbeck, M.; Kay, M.; Livingstone, S.; Loesgen, B.; Martin, D.; Mohr, S.; Ozu, N.; Peat, B.; Pinnock, J.; Stark, P.; Williams, K.: XML professionell : behandelt W3C DOM, SAX, CSS, XSLT, DTDs, XML Schemas, XLink, XPointer, XPath, E-Commerce, BizTalk, B2B, SOAP, WAP, WML (2000)
0.00
0.0030997968 = product of:
0.0061995937 = sum of:
0.0061995937 = product of:
0.01859878 = sum of:
0.01859878 = weight(_text_:22 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01859878 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2005 15:12:11
-
Pott, O.; Wielage, G.: XML Praxis und Referenz (2000)
0.00
0.002600472 = product of:
0.005200944 = sum of:
0.005200944 = product of:
0.015602832 = sum of:
0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 6985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015602832 = score(doc=6985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 6985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6985)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Als CD-Beilage von: PC Magazin 2002; H.7
-
Behme, H.; Mintert, S.: XML in der Praxis : Professionelles Web-Publishing mit der Extensible Markup Language (2000)
0.00
0.0020803777 = product of:
0.0041607553 = sum of:
0.0041607553 = product of:
0.012482265 = sum of:
0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012482265 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
XML & Co : Die W3C-Spezifikationen für Dokumenten- und Datenarchitektur (2002)
0.00
0.0020803777 = product of:
0.0041607553 = sum of:
0.0041607553 = product of:
0.012482265 = sum of:
0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012482265 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: XML Magazin und Web Services 2003, H.1, S.13 (T. Weitzel): "Die Standards der XML-Familie sind nun auch in deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentierung verfügbar. Unter der Leitung von Stefan Mintert, der 1998 bereits die XML-Spezifikation selbst übersetzte, ist zusammen mit einem Team namhafter XML-Spezialisten und mit Unterstützung des deutsch-österreichischen W3C-Büros eine Sammlung aller wichtigen Specs aus der XML-Familie bei Addison-Wesley erschienen. Genauer gesagt handelt es sich um die kommentierten und übersetzten Versionen der Standards aus der W3C Activity Domain Architecture/XML, und zwar, in chronologischer Reihenfolge, XML, Namensräume, Verknüpfen von Stylesheets mit XML-Dokumenten, XPath, XSLT, XML Schema 0-3 (Einführung, Strukturen und Datentypen), XLink, XML Base und XML Information Set. Ziel des Projekts "edition W3C" war es, den Inhalt der jeweiligen Spezifikationen besser verständlich zu machen und so auch einen Beitrag zur Verbreitung der Standards zu leisten. Daher liegen die Übersetzungen nicht nur in Buchform vor, sondern sind sie über das normative Original hinaus in unterschiedlichem Umfang durch die jeweiligen Experten kommentiert. Insbesondere XPath ist so ausführlich und liebevoll mit vielen Erläuterungen und Abbildungen versehen, dass eine analoge Behandlung etwa der Schema-Specs sicherlich den Rahmen des Buchs gesprengt hätte. Das erhoffte Feedback auf die unterschiedlichen Übersetzungen und Kommentierungen soll helfen, das geplante zweite Buch der edition W3C-Reihe zu XHTML und CSS an den Leserwünschen auszurichten. Interessant ist, dass das Buch selbst in XML erstellt wurde (XMLspec-DTD). Wie schon in "XML in der Praxis" (zusammen mit Henning Behme) hat Stefan Mintert für die edition W3C in lehrbuchmäßiger Cross-Media-Manier XML eingesetzt. So konnte beispielsweise das Stichwortverzeichnis (www.edition-w3c.de/ gesamtindex.html) direkt per Single Source aus den jeweiligen Spezifikationen generiert werden. Eine Besonderheit des 1999 initiierten Projekts liegt darin, dass es sich um die einzige durch das W3C legitimierte PrintPublikation überhaupt handelt, nachdem 1997 das WWW Journal (W3J) bei O'Reilly eingestellt wurde. Darüber hinaus ist die edition W3 C das einzige offizielle, also vom örtlichen W3C-Büro unterstützte, Übersetzungsprojekt. Bedenkt man, dass das W3C-neben Boston-Sitze in Frankreich und Japan hat, stellt sich die Frage, ob dort Übersetzungen nicht noch viel stärker nachgefragt werden könnten und somit auch zur weiteren Durchsetzung der XML-Familie beitragen könnten. Die Übersetzungen sind, allerdings ohne Kommentierungen, auch über die Website des Projekts bei www.edition-w3c.de/ verlinkt. Dort gibt es auch weitere Übersetzungen, etwa zu XHTML oder CSS L2."
-
Lee, M.; Baillie, S.; Dell'Oro, J.: TML: a Thesaural Markpup Language (200?)
0.00
0.0020164545 = product of:
0.004032909 = sum of:
0.004032909 = product of:
0.012098727 = sum of:
0.012098727 = weight(_text_:a in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012098727 = score(doc=1622,freq=18.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Thesauri are used to provide controlled vocabularies for resource classification. Their use can greatly assist document discovery because thesauri man date a consistent shared terminology for describing documents. A particular thesauras classifies documents according to an information community's needs. As a result, there are many different thesaural schemas. This has led to a proliferation of schema-specific thesaural systems. In our research, we exploit schematic regularities to design a generic thesaural ontology and specfiy it as a markup language. The language provides a common representational framework in which to encode the idiosyncrasies of specific thesauri. This approach has several advantages: it offers consistent syntax and semantics in which to express thesauri; it allows general purpose thesaural applications to leverage many thesauri; and it supports a single thesaural user interface by which information communities can consistently organise, score and retrieve electronic documents.
-
Chang, M.: ¬An electronic finding aid using extensible markup language (XML) and encoded archival description (EAD) (2000)
0.00
0.0017534725 = product of:
0.003506945 = sum of:
0.003506945 = product of:
0.0105208345 = sum of:
0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0105208345 = score(doc=4886,freq=10.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Increasingly, XML applications are appearing on the World Wide Web, from e-commerce to information management. In the case of libraries and archives, XML enables more flexible information management and retrieval than using MARC or a relational database management system. Describes a project to explore the use of XML and the EAD, and the development of a prototype electronic finding aid. It focuses on the technical aspects, and reviews the options available and the choices made. This is done within the setting of a small- to medium-sized archive with minimal tools and resources.
- Type
- a
-
Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997)
0.00
0.0017090737 = product of:
0.0034181473 = sum of:
0.0034181473 = product of:
0.010254442 = sum of:
0.010254442 = weight(_text_:a in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010254442 = score(doc=5903,freq=38.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19435552 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
- Content
- RDF Data Model At the core of RDF is a model for representing named properties and their values. These properties serve both to represent attributes of resources (and in this sense correspond to usual attribute-value-pairs) and to represent relationships between resources. The RDF data model is a syntax-independent way of representing RDF statements. RDF statements that are syntactically very different could mean the same thing. This concept of equivalence in meaning is very important when performing queries, aggregation and a number of other tasks at which RDF is aimed. The equivalence is defined in a clean machine understandable way. Two pieces of RDF are equivalent if and only if their corresponding data model representations are the same. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. RDF Data Model 3. RDF Grammar 4. Signed RDF 5. Examples 6. Appendix A: Brief Explanation of XML Namespaces
-
Peis, E.; Moya, F. de; Fernández-Molina, J.C.: Encoded archival description (EAD) conversion : a methodological proposal (2000)
0.00
0.0015683535 = product of:
0.003136707 = sum of:
0.003136707 = product of:
0.009410121 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=4899,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The eventual adaptation of archives to new technological possibilities could begin with the creation of digital versions of archival finding aids, which would allow the international diffusion of descriptive information. The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), document type definition (DTD) for archival description known as encoded archival description (EAD) is an appropriate tool for this purpose. Presents a methodological strategy that begins with an analysis of EAD and the informational object to be marked up, allowing the semiautomatic creation of a digital version.
- Type
- a
