Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

0.057192516 = product of:
  0.11438503 = sum of:
    0.11438503 = product of:
      0.17157754 = sum of:
        0.08679052 = weight(_text_:b in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08679052 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.08478702 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08478702 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.9-22

Source

Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse: Vorträge der Arbeitsgruppe Begriffsanalyse, Darmstadt 1986. Hrsg. von B. Ganter, R. Wille u. K.E. Wolff

0.02500919 = product of:
  0.05001838 = sum of:
    0.05001838 = product of:
      0.07502757 = sum of:
        0.044030957 = weight(_text_:x in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044030957 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.030996617 = weight(_text_:b in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030996617 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.

0.017612383 = product of:
  0.035224766 = sum of:
    0.035224766 = product of:
      0.10567429 = sum of:
        0.10567429 = weight(_text_:x in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10567429 = score(doc=478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229754925_1_Basic_Conceptual_Domains. Vgl. auch: DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00234.x.

0.016531529 = product of:
  0.033063058 = sum of:
    0.033063058 = product of:
      0.09918917 = sum of:
        0.09918917 = weight(_text_:b in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09918917 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Cognition and catgorization. Ed. by Eleanor Rosch, Barbara B. Lloyd

0.016531529 = product of:
  0.033063058 = sum of:
    0.033063058 = product of:
      0.09918917 = sum of:
        0.09918917 = weight(_text_:b in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09918917 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.015005514 = product of:
  0.030011028 = sum of:
    0.030011028 = product of:
      0.045016542 = sum of:
        0.026418572 = weight(_text_:x in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026418572 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.13996346 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.01859797 = weight(_text_:b in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01859797 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.117433704 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Ganter, B.

Isbn

3-540-67859-X

0.014465086 = product of:
  0.028930172 = sum of:
    0.028930172 = product of:
      0.08679052 = sum of:
        0.08679052 = weight(_text_:b in 881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08679052 = score(doc=881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=881)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse: Vorträge der Arbeitstagung Begriffsanalyse, Darmstadt 1986. Hrsg. von B. Ganter, R. Wille u. K.E. Wolff

0.012112431 = product of:
  0.024224862 = sum of:
    0.024224862 = product of:
      0.07267459 = sum of:
        0.07267459 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07267459 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)

0.011741589 = product of:
  0.023483178 = sum of:
    0.023483178 = product of:
      0.07044953 = sum of:
        0.07044953 = weight(_text_:x in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044953 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Isbn

3-11-012078-X

0.008074954 = product of:
  0.016149908 = sum of:
    0.016149908 = product of:
      0.048449725 = sum of:
        0.048449725 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048449725 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.0073059723 = product of:
  0.014611945 = sum of:
    0.014611945 = product of:
      0.043835834 = sum of:
        0.043835834 = weight(_text_:b in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043835834 = score(doc=3461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)

0.007264737 = product of:
  0.014529474 = sum of:
    0.014529474 = product of:
      0.043588422 = sum of:
        0.043588422 = weight(_text_:x in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043588422 = score(doc=1077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18875335 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23092794 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.

Type

x

0.007232543 = product of:
  0.014465086 = sum of:
    0.014465086 = product of:
      0.04339526 = sum of:
        0.04339526 = weight(_text_:b in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339526 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die folgenden Beiträge: FELBER, H.: Fachsprache aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; BUDIN, G.: Terminologie und Fachkommunikation; HOHNHOLD, I.: Fachsprache konstituierende Gegenstände, Vorgänge, Maßnahmen und Strukturen: auf dem Weg von Begriffen und Benennungen zum Fachtext; ARNTZ, R. u. E. EYDAM: Zum Verhältnis von Sprach- und Sachwissen beim Übersetzen von Fachtexten; GUNNARSON, B.-L.: Fachsprachen und soziolinguistische Theorien: eine Untersuchung über ihre Relevanz für die Fachsprachenforschung; BORNETO, C.S.: Gebrauchsanweisungen: Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Subtexte; SAGER, J.C.: The position of special languages between natural and artificial languages

0.007232543 = product of:
  0.014465086 = sum of:
    0.014465086 = product of:
      0.04339526 = sum of:
        0.04339526 = weight(_text_:b in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339526 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al

0.007232543 = product of:
  0.014465086 = sum of:
    0.014465086 = product of:
      0.04339526 = sum of:
        0.04339526 = weight(_text_:b in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339526 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.007158363 = product of:
  0.014316726 = sum of:
    0.014316726 = product of:
      0.042950176 = sum of:
        0.042950176 = weight(_text_:b in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042950176 = score(doc=5868,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.27120155 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Ontologie ist in der Philosophie die Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage, welche Arten von Gegenständen existieren und in welcher Weise sie existieren. Ein zentrales Thema ist z. B., ob es geistige Gegenstände, z. B. Gedanken, Ideen, Begriffe, Vorstellungen u. a. gibt und wie ihre Existenz begründet wird. Neuerdings wird mit dem Wort "Ontologie" eine andere, etwas konkretere Bedeutung verbunden. Unter einer Ontologie werden die allgemeinsten Begriffe eines Fachgebiets verstanden. So gehören zur Ontologie des Organischen u. a. "Pflanze", "Tier" und "Mensch". Wenn der Begriff "Tier" schon gegeben ist, lassen sich daraus andere Begriffe, z. B. "Wirbeltier", "Reptil", "Säugetier" usw. spezifizierend durch Angabe weiterer Merkmale bilden. Außerdem können Begriffsbeziehungen und andere formale Mittel zu Ontologien gehören. Ontologie ist danach die Methode, durch die die Begriffswelt eines Sachgebiets bestimmt wird, und insbesondere das Ergebnis dieser Methode: die Struktur aus Begriffen höchster Allgemeinheit, die mit dieser Methode erstellt wird. Das Wort "Ontologie" kann jedoch unterschiedlich verstanden wird. Es bezeichnet auch die Gesamtheit aller Begriffe, die zum Untersuchungsgegenstand gehören. Die Ontologie umfasst dann alles, was an Begriffen aus einer bestimmten Aufgabenstellung betrachtet bzw. erarbeitet wird. Zu einer Ontologie der Elektronik würden alle Begriffe dieses Gebietes gehören. Mit einem so weit gefassten Verständnis des Wortes "Ontologie" wird die Fokussierung auf die Kategorien größter Allgemeinheit der hierarchisch gegliederten Begriffswelt aufgegeben. Außerdem würde eine so verstandene Ontologie mit der Tatsache der Unabgrenzbarkeit des Wortschatzes belastet werden. Komposita können im Deutschen quasi unbegrenzt erweitert werden. Es gibt nicht nur den Kamin und den Kaminfeger, sondern auch die Kaminfegerarbeitskleidungsreinigungsfirma und dergleichen mehr. Komposita sind unverzichtbar. Ihre maximale Länge ist nicht festgelegt. Die Benennungen für Stoffe in der Chemie zeigen, dass man in dieser Fachsprache durchaus problemlos mit sehr langen Zusammensetzungen kommuniziert. Aber die Ontologen werden nicht daran interessiert sein, ihre Untersuchungen bis in die Tiefen aller Fachgebiete auszudehnen. Kurzum "Ontologie" sollte sich auf Begriffe höchster Allgemeinheit beziehen. Das entspricht der engeren Bedeutung des Wortes "Ontologie". Die Unterbegriffe dieser Top-Level-Begriffe können natürlich ebenfalls für Ontologen von Interesse sein, weil sie zeigen, welches Begriffsbildungspotenzial die verschiedenen Top-Level-Begriffe haben. Der Schwerpunkt des Interesses der Ontologen sollte aber auf den Begriffen liegen, die nicht weiter zurückführbar sind.

0.007065585 = product of:
  0.01413117 = sum of:
    0.01413117 = product of:
      0.04239351 = sum of:
        0.04239351 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04239351 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:17:40

0.007065585 = product of:
  0.01413117 = sum of:
    0.01413117 = product of:
      0.04239351 = sum of:
        0.04239351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04239351 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15653133 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.22-33

0.006263567 = product of:
  0.012527134 = sum of:
    0.012527134 = product of:
      0.037581403 = sum of:
        0.037581403 = weight(_text_:b in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037581403 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23730135 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support

Content

Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)

0.0061993236 = product of:
  0.012398647 = sum of:
    0.012398647 = product of:
      0.03719594 = sum of:
        0.03719594 = weight(_text_:b in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03719594 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15836994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04469987 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al