Search (51 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Fassbender, J.: Editorial (2007) 0.02
    0.017817017 = product of:
      0.035634033 = sum of:
        0.035634033 = product of:
          0.07126807 = sum of:
            0.07126807 = weight(_text_:j in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07126807 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Fassbender, J.: German indexing : some observations on typographical practice (2006) 0.02
    0.017817017 = product of:
      0.035634033 = sum of:
        0.035634033 = product of:
          0.07126807 = sum of:
            0.07126807 = weight(_text_:j in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07126807 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Anker, J.: Some principles of a systematically arranged subject catalogue with an index (1956) 0.02
    0.017817017 = product of:
      0.035634033 = sum of:
        0.035634033 = product of:
          0.07126807 = sum of:
            0.07126807 = weight(_text_:j in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07126807 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02
    0.017487664 = product of:
      0.034975328 = sum of:
        0.034975328 = product of:
          0.069950655 = sum of:
            0.069950655 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069950655 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  5. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02
    0.017487664 = product of:
      0.034975328 = sum of:
        0.034975328 = product of:
          0.069950655 = sum of:
            0.069950655 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069950655 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  6. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02
    0.015457057 = product of:
      0.030914115 = sum of:
        0.030914115 = product of:
          0.06182823 = sum of:
            0.06182823 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06182823 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  7. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Die Pressedatenbank für Text und Bild des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (1977) 0.02
    0.015271729 = product of:
      0.030543458 = sum of:
        0.030543458 = product of:
          0.061086915 = sum of:
            0.061086915 = weight(_text_:j in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061086915 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    In diesem Aufsatz wird auch der Aufbau des G+J Index ausführlich erläutert
  8. Shuter, J.: Indexing standards : where do they come from and what use are they? (1993) 0.02
    0.015271729 = product of:
      0.030543458 = sum of:
        0.030543458 = product of:
          0.061086915 = sum of:
            0.061086915 = weight(_text_:j in 8091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061086915 = score(doc=8091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 8091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Hartmann, K.: PDS: Retrievalsoftware für die Pressedatenbank (1984) 0.01
    0.014398323 = product of:
      0.028796647 = sum of:
        0.028796647 = product of:
          0.057593293 = sum of:
            0.057593293 = weight(_text_:j in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057593293 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die PDS - Pressedatenbank Retrieval Software - ist eine neue Informationsdatenbank-Software. Sie ist einsatzfähig für Literaturhinweise und Volltextspeicherung. Sie läuft auf IBM-kompatiblem Rechnern. Sie wurde auf dem Hintergrund zehnjähriger Erfahrung im Umgang mit Datenbanken entworfen. PDS verfügt über eine einzigartige phonetische Abfragemöglichkeit, über ein Programm zur Herstellung gedruckter Register und eine Schnittstelle zu dem elektronischen Massenspeicher MEGADOC von Philips. In der G+J Pressedatenbank sind derzeit mehr als 1,4 Mio Datensätze gespeichert. Die G+J Dokumentation versorgt mehr als 800 Redakteure mit Textinformation und Bildern
  10. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  11. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  12. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  13. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  14. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  16. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.010181152 = product of:
      0.020362305 = sum of:
        0.020362305 = product of:
          0.04072461 = sum of:
            0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04072461 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Bertram, J.: I would do it agian : Erfahrungen mit der intuitiven Registererstellung (2007) 0.01
    0.010181152 = product of:
      0.020362305 = sum of:
        0.020362305 = product of:
          0.04072461 = sum of:
            0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04072461 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Fassbender, J.: ¬Die Register des Buchinhalts : Register oder Konkordanz (2011) 0.01
    0.010181152 = product of:
      0.020362305 = sum of:
        0.020362305 = product of:
          0.04072461 = sum of:
            0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04072461 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
    0.0077285287 = product of:
      0.015457057 = sum of:
        0.015457057 = product of:
          0.030914115 = sum of:
            0.030914115 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030914115 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  20. Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 12

Types

  • a 43
  • m 7
  • s 1
  • More… Less…