-
Lee, J.; Min, J.-K.; Oh, A.; Chung, C.-W.: Effective ranking and search techniques for Web resources considering semantic relationships (2014)
0.01
0.013872546 = product of:
0.027745092 = sum of:
0.027745092 = product of:
0.055490185 = sum of:
0.055490185 = weight(_text_:k in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055490185 = score(doc=2670,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- On the Semantic Web, the types of resources and the semantic relationships between resources are defined in an ontology. By using that information, the accuracy of information retrieval can be improved. In this paper, we present effective ranking and search techniques considering the semantic relationships in an ontology. Our technique retrieves top-k resources which are the most relevant to query keywords through the semantic relationships. To do this, we propose a weighting measure for the semantic relationship. Based on this measure, we propose a novel ranking method which considers the number of meaningful semantic relationships between a resource and keywords as well as the coverage and discriminating power of keywords. In order to improve the efficiency of the search, we prune the unnecessary search space using the length and weight thresholds of the semantic relationship path. In addition, we exploit Threshold Algorithm based on an extended inverted index to answer top-k results efficiently. The experimental results using real data sets demonstrate that our retrieval method using the semantic information generates accurate results efficiently compared to the traditional methods.
-
Efron, M.; Winget, M.: Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments (2010)
0.01
0.013592264 = product of:
0.027184527 = sum of:
0.027184527 = product of:
0.054369055 = sum of:
0.054369055 = weight(_text_:k in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054369055 = score(doc=3469,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking information retrieval (IR) systems with respect to their effectiveness is a crucial operation during IR evaluation, as well as during data fusion. This article offers a novel method of approaching the system-ranking problem, based on the widely studied idea of polyrepresentation. The principle of polyrepresentation suggests that a single information need can be represented by many query articulations-what we call query aspects. By skimming the top k (where k is small) documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we collect a set of documents that are likely to be relevant to a given test topic. Labeling these skimmed documents as putatively relevant lets us build pseudorelevance judgments without undue human intervention. We report experiments where using these pseudorelevance judgments delivers a rank ordering of IR systems that correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = product of:
0.049326822 = sum of:
0.049326822 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049326822 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.01
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = product of:
0.049326822 = sum of:
0.049326822 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049326822 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019)
0.01
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = product of:
0.044852186 = sum of:
0.044852186 = weight(_text_:k in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044852186 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.010899791 = product of:
0.021799581 = sum of:
0.021799581 = product of:
0.043599162 = sum of:
0.043599162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043599162 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Pseudorelevance feedback (PRF) was proposed to solve the limitation of relevance feedback (RF), which is based on the user-in-the-loop process. In PRF, the top-k retrieved images are regarded as PRF. Although the PRF set contains noise, PRF has proven effective for automatically improving the overall retrieval result. To implement PRF, the Rocchio algorithm has been considered as a reasonable and well-established baseline. However, the performance of Rocchio-based PRF is subject to various representation choices (or factors). In this article, we examine these factors that affect the performance of Rocchio-based PRF, including image-feature representation, the number of top-ranked images, the weighting parameters of Rocchio, and similarity measure. We offer practical insights on how to optimize the performance of Rocchio-based PRF by choosing appropriate representation choices. Our extensive experiments on NUS-WIDE-LITE and Caltech 101 + Corel 5000 data sets show that the optimal feature representation is color moment + wavelet texture in terms of retrieval efficiency and effectiveness. Other representation choices are that using top-20 ranked images as pseudopositive and pseudonegative feedback sets with the equal weight (i.e., 0.5) by the correlation and cosine distance functions can produce the optimal retrieval result.
-
Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hubert, G.; Pitarch, Y.; Pinel-Sauvagnat, K.; Tournier, R.; Laporte, L.: TournaRank : when retrieval becomes document competition (2018)
0.01
0.008009318 = product of:
0.016018637 = sum of:
0.016018637 = product of:
0.032037273 = sum of:
0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032037273 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.01
0.007707316 = product of:
0.015414632 = sum of:
0.015414632 = product of:
0.030829264 = sum of:
0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030829264 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.01
0.007707316 = product of:
0.015414632 = sum of:
0.015414632 = product of:
0.030829264 = sum of:
0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030829264 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
