Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0051906724 = product of:
  0.010381345 = sum of:
    0.010381345 = product of:
      0.02076269 = sum of:
        0.02076269 = weight(_text_:d in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02076269 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

0.0017302242 = product of:
  0.0034604485 = sum of:
    0.0034604485 = product of:
      0.006920897 = sum of:
        0.006920897 = weight(_text_:d in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006920897 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

0.0015293167 = product of:
  0.0030586333 = sum of:
    0.0030586333 = product of:
      0.0061172666 = sum of:
        0.0061172666 = weight(_text_:d in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061172666 = score(doc=6299,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.07421375 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: GREFENSTETTE, G.: The Problem of Cross-Language Information Retrieval; DAVIS, M.W.: On the Effective Use of Large Parallel Corpora in Cross-Language Text Retrieval; BALLESTEROS, L. u. W.B. CROFT: Statistical Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval; Distributed Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval; Automatic Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Latent Semantic Indexing; EVANS, D.A. u.a.: Mapping Vocabularies Using Latent Semantics; PICCHI, E. u. C. PETERS: Cross-Language Information Retrieval: A System for Comparable Corpus Querying; YAMABANA, K. u.a.: A Language Conversion Front-End for Cross-Language Information Retrieval; GACHOT, D.A. u.a.: The Systran NLP Browser: An Application of Machine Translation Technology in Cross-Language Information Retrieval; HULL, D.: A Weighted Boolean Model for Cross-Language Text Retrieval; SHERIDAN, P. u.a. Building a Large Multilingual Test Collection from Comparable News Documents; OARD; D.W. u. B.J. DORR: Evaluating Cross-Language Text Filtering Effectiveness

Footnote

Rez. in: Machine translation review: 1999, no.10, S.26-27 (D. Lewis): "Cross Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) addresses the growing need to access large volumes of data across language boundaries. The typical requirement is for the user to input a free form query, usually a brief description of a topic, into a search or retrieval engine which returns a list, in ranked order, of documents or web pages that are relevant to the topic. The search engine matches the terms in the query to indexed terms, usually keywords previously derived from the target documents. Unlike monolingual information retrieval, CLIR requires query terms in one language to be matched to indexed terms in another. Matching can be done by bilingual dictionary lookup, full machine translation, or by applying statistical methods. A query's success is measured in terms of recall (how many potentially relevant target documents are found) and precision (what proportion of documents found are relevant). Issues in CLIR are how to translate query terms into index terms, how to eliminate alternative translations (e.g. to decide that French 'traitement' in a query means 'treatment' and not 'salary'), and how to rank or weight translation alternatives that are retained (e.g. how to order the French terms 'aventure', 'business', 'affaire', and 'liaison' as relevant translations of English 'affair'). Grefenstette provides a lucid and useful overview of the field and the problems. The volume brings together a number of experiments and projects in CLIR. Mark Davies (New Mexico State University) describes Recuerdo, a Spanish retrieval engine which reduces translation ambiguities by scanning indexes for parallel texts; it also uses either a bilingual dictionary or direct equivalents from a parallel corpus in order to compare results for queries on parallel texts. Lisa Ballesteros and Bruce Croft (University of Massachusetts) use a 'local feedback' technique which automatically enhances a query by adding extra terms to it both before and after translation; such terms can be derived from documents known to be relevant to the query.