Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.07
    0.070571356 = product of:
      0.14114271 = sum of:
        0.14114271 = sum of:
          0.09866865 = weight(_text_:z in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09866865 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.042474065 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042474065 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  2. Longshu, L.; Xia, Z.: On an aproximate fuzzy information retrieval agent (1998) 0.03
    0.028191041 = product of:
      0.056382082 = sum of:
        0.056382082 = product of:
          0.112764165 = sum of:
            0.112764165 = weight(_text_:z in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112764165 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015) 0.03
    0.028191041 = product of:
      0.056382082 = sum of:
        0.056382082 = product of:
          0.112764165 = sum of:
            0.112764165 = weight(_text_:z in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112764165 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das von der DFG geförderte Projekt LibRank erforscht neue Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme, die aufbauend auf Erkenntnissen aus dem Bereich Websuche qualitätsinduzierende Faktoren wie z. B. Aktualität, Popularität und Verfügbarkeit von einzelnen Medien berücksichtigen. Die konzipierten Verfahren werden im Kontext eines in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften häufig genutzten Rechercheportals (EconBiz) entwickelt und in einem Testsystem systematisch evaluiert. Es werden Rankingfaktoren, die für den Bibliotheksbereich von besonderem Interesse sind, vorgestellt und exemplarisch Probleme und Herausforderungen aufgezeigt.
  4. Pan, M.; Huang, J.X.; He, T.; Mao, Z.; Ying, Z.; Tu, X.: ¬A simple kernel co-occurrence-based enhancement for pseudo-relevance feedback (2020) 0.02
    0.024917595 = product of:
      0.04983519 = sum of:
        0.04983519 = product of:
          0.09967038 = sum of:
            0.09967038 = weight(_text_:z in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09967038 = score(doc=5678,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.02
    0.024667162 = product of:
      0.049334325 = sum of:
        0.049334325 = product of:
          0.09866865 = sum of:
            0.09866865 = weight(_text_:z in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09866865 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
  6. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.02
    0.024667162 = product of:
      0.049334325 = sum of:
        0.049334325 = product of:
          0.09866865 = sum of:
            0.09866865 = weight(_text_:z in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09866865 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme. Dazu wurden mögliche Faktoren für das Relevanzranking ausgehend von den Verfahren in Websuchmaschinen identifiziert, auf den Bibliothekskontext übertragen und systematisch evaluiert. Mithilfe eines Testsystems, das auf dem ZBW-Informationsportal EconBiz und einer web-basierten Software zur Evaluierung von Suchsystemen aufsetzt, wurden verschiedene Relevanzfaktoren (z. B. Popularität in Verbindung mit Aktualität) getestet. Obwohl die getesteten Rankingverfahren auf einer theoretischen Ebene divers sind, konnten keine einheitlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber den Baseline-Rankings gemessen werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Adaptierung des Rankings auf individuelle Nutzer bzw. Nutzungskontexte notwendig sein könnte, um eine höhere Performance zu erzielen.
  7. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.024270894 = product of:
      0.048541788 = sum of:
        0.048541788 = product of:
          0.097083576 = sum of:
            0.097083576 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097083576 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  8. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.021237032 = product of:
      0.042474065 = sum of:
        0.042474065 = product of:
          0.08494813 = sum of:
            0.08494813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08494813 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  9. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.021237032 = product of:
      0.042474065 = sum of:
        0.042474065 = product of:
          0.08494813 = sum of:
            0.08494813 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08494813 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  10. Li, H.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Lin, S.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.: PSI: A probabilistic semantic interpretable framework for fine-grained image ranking (2018) 0.02
    0.021143282 = product of:
      0.042286564 = sum of:
        0.042286564 = product of:
          0.08457313 = sum of:
            0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08457313 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.018203171 = product of:
      0.036406342 = sum of:
        0.036406342 = product of:
          0.072812684 = sum of:
            0.072812684 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072812684 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  12. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.018203171 = product of:
      0.036406342 = sum of:
        0.036406342 = product of:
          0.072812684 = sum of:
            0.072812684 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072812684 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  13. Chen, Z.; Meng, X.; Fowler, R.H.; Zhu, B.: Real-time adaptive feature and document learning for Web search (2001) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 5209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=5209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 5209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Chen, Z.; Fu, B.: On the complexity of Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm (2007) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Li, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.-H.: Semi-supervised document retrieval (2009) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Ye, Z.; Huang, J.X.: ¬A learning to rank approach for quality-aware pseudo-relevance feedback (2016) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Jiang, X.; Sun, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhuge, H.; Lapshinova-Koltunski, E.; Yao, J.: Exploiting heterogeneous scientific literature networks to combat ranking bias : evidence from the computational linguistics area (2016) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Zhu, J.; Han, L.; Gou, Z.; Yuan, X.: ¬A fuzzy clustering-based denoising model for evaluating uncertainty in collaborative filtering recommender systems (2018) 0.02
    0.017619401 = product of:
      0.035238802 = sum of:
        0.035238802 = product of:
          0.070477605 = sum of:
            0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070477605 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22

Years

Languages

  • e 34
  • d 7
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 40
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…