Search (4153 results, page 3 of 208)

  1. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  3. Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Unser Projekt soll eine Kreuzkonkordanz zwischen den Universalklassifikationen wie der "Regensburger Verbundsklassifikation (RVK)" und der "Basisklassifikation (BK)" sowie den Fachklassifikationen "Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC2010)" und "Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS2010)" in den Fachgebieten Mathematik und Physik herstellen. Fazit: "Die klassifikatorische Übereinstmmung zwischen Regensburger Verbundklassifikation und Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme war in einzelnen Fachbereichen (z. B. Kernphysik) recht gut. Doch andere Fachbereiche (z.B. Polymerphysik, Mineralogie) stimmten sehr wenig überein. Insgesamt konnten wir 890 einfache Verbindungen erstellen. Mehrfachverbindungen wurden aus technischen Gründen nicht mitgezählt. Das Projekt war insgesamt sehr umfangreich, daher konnte es im Rahmen der zwanzig Projekttage nicht erschöpfend behandelt werden. Eine Weiterentwicklung, insbesondere hinsichtlich des kollektiven Zuganges in Form eines Webformulars und der automatischen Klassifizierung erscheint jedoch sinnvoll."
    Pages
    22 S
  4. Engerer, V.: Metapher und Wissenstransfers im informationsbezogenen Diskurs (2013) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag1 ist ein Versuch, Eigenschaften von Schöns generativer Metapher auf das "statische" Resultat als Fachterminologie, entstanden durch Übertragung eines wissenschaftlichen Bereiches in einen anderen, anzuwenden. Metapher gilt in diesem Bereich als wissenstransferierendes Verfahren der Übertragung von Konzepten einer Disziplin auf eine andere. Weiterhin wird Metapher als Teil des sprachlichen Jargons in der informationswissenschaftlichen und bibliothekarischen Praxis thematisiert. Ein kurzer Durchgang des dänischen bibliotheksmetaphorischen Wortschatzes zeigt u. a., dass in dieser Domäne ein "ontologisches Erfahrungsgefälle" von abstrakt-konkret wirksam ist, da viele bibliothekstechnische, computer-interaktionsbezogene und informationswissenschaftliche Begriffe mit Hilfe konkreterer Konzepte aus besser verstandenen Domänen, z. B. dem Bereich der Nahrungsaufnahme, erklärt werden. Allerdings scheint auch hier der Anteil "entmetaphorisierter", ehemals metaphorischer Ausdrücke hoch zu sein, wie es bei "abgeschliffenen" Ausdrücken auch in der Gemeinsprache der Fall ist. Die Analyse wird abgerundet mit einem Ausblick auf ein Forschungsgebiet, das in dezidierter Weise von der konzeptuellen Ergiebigkeit des Metaphernbegriffs in der Untersuchung der terminologischen Wissenschaftsbeziehungen Gebrauch macht
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:06:49
  5. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  6. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.06
    0.060489736 = product of:
      0.12097947 = sum of:
        0.12097947 = sum of:
          0.08457313 = weight(_text_:z in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457313 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036406342 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um ­eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  7. #220 0.06
    0.0600674 = product of:
      0.1201348 = sum of:
        0.1201348 = product of:
          0.2402696 = sum of:
            0.2402696 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2402696 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  8. #1387 0.06
    0.0600674 = product of:
      0.1201348 = sum of:
        0.1201348 = product of:
          0.2402696 = sum of:
            0.2402696 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2402696 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  9. #2103 0.06
    0.0600674 = product of:
      0.1201348 = sum of:
        0.1201348 = product of:
          0.2402696 = sum of:
            0.2402696 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2402696 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  10. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.06
    0.059625655 = sum of:
      0.044456344 = product of:
        0.17782538 = sum of:
          0.17782538 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17782538 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37968612 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.015169309 = product of:
        0.030338619 = sum of:
          0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030338619 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  11. Doszkocs, T.E.; Zamora, A.: Dictionary services and spelling aids for Web searching (2004) 0.06
    0.056691445 = product of:
      0.11338289 = sum of:
        0.11338289 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
          0.042905286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042905286 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Specialized Information Services Division (SIS) of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) provides Web access to more than a dozen scientific databases on toxicology and the environment on TOXNET . Search queries on TOXNET often include misspelled or variant English words, medical and scientific jargon and chemical names. Following the example of search engines like Google and ClinicalTrials.gov, we set out to develop a spelling "suggestion" system for increased recall and precision in TOXNET searching. This paper describes development of dictionary technology that can be used in a variety of applications such as orthographic verification, writing aid, natural language processing, and information storage and retrieval. The design of the technology allows building complex applications using the components developed in the earlier phases of the work in a modular fashion without extensive rewriting of computer code. Since many of the potential applications envisioned for this work have on-line or web-based interfaces, the dictionaries and other computer components must have fast response, and must be adaptable to open-ended database vocabularies, including chemical nomenclature. The dictionary vocabulary for this work was derived from SIS and other databases and specialized resources, such as NLM's Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) . The resulting technology, A-Z Dictionary (AZdict), has three major constituents: 1) the vocabulary list, 2) the word attributes that define part of speech and morphological relationships between words in the list, and 3) a set of programs that implements the retrieval of words and their attributes, and determines similarity between words (ChemSpell). These three components can be used in various applications such as spelling verification, spelling aid, part-of-speech tagging, paraphrasing, and many other natural language processing functions.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 17:22:56
    Source
    Online. 28(2004) no.3, S.22-29
  12. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.06
    0.056691445 = product of:
      0.11338289 = sum of:
        0.11338289 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.042905286 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042905286 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Bibliographische Daten Um den Geltungsbereich der Prinzipien festzulegen, wird in diesem ersten Teil der zugrundeliegende Begriff bibliographischer Daten erläutert. Kerndaten Bibliographische Daten bestehen aus bibliographischen Beschreibungen. Eine bibliographische Beschreibung beschreibt eine bibliographische Ressource (Artikel, Monographie etc. - ob gedruckt oder elektronisch) zum Zwecke 1. der Identifikation der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. des Zeigens auf eine bestimmte Ressource in der Gesamtheit aller bibliographischer Ressourcen und 2. der Lokalisierung der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. eines Hinweises, wo die beschriebene Ressource aufzufinden ist. Traditionellerweise erfüllte eine Beschreibung beide Zwecke gleichzeitig, indem sie Information lieferte über: Autor(en) und Herausgeber, Titel, Verlag, Veröffentlichungsdatum und -ort, Identifizierung des übergeordneten Werks (z.B. einer Zeitschrift), Seitenangaben. Im Web findet Identifikation statt mittels Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) wie z.B. URNs oder DOIs. Lokalisierung wird ermöglicht durch HTTP-URIs, die auch als Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) bezeichnet werden. Alle URIs für bibliographische Ressourcen fallen folglich unter den engen Begriff bibliographischer Daten. Sekundäre Daten Eine bibliographische Beschreibung kann andere Informationen enthalten, die unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen, beispielsweise Nicht-Web-Identifikatoren (ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.), Angaben zum Urheberrechtsstatus, administrative Daten und mehr; diese Daten können von Bibliotheken, Verlagen, Wissenschaftlern, Online-Communities für Buchliebhaber, sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystemen und Anderen produziert sein. Darüber hinaus produzieren Bibliotheken und verwandte Institutionen kontrollierte Vokabulare zum Zwecke der bibliographischen Beschreibung wie z. B. Personen- und Schlagwortnormdateien, Klassifikationen etc., die ebenfalls unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen."
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
  13. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.06
    0.056691445 = product of:
      0.11338289 = sum of:
        0.11338289 = sum of:
          0.070477605 = weight(_text_:z in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070477605 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.042905286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042905286 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04478481 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  14. Kàrolyi, Z.: ¬Das Schlagwortregister der Bibliographien (1984) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. (1954-) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    z
  16. Ercegovac, Z.: Augmented assistance in online catalog subject searching (1989) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. ¬The Indexer (1958 ff.) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    z
  18. Nowicki, Z.: First meeting of CDS/ISIS distributors in Europe and the Mediterranean area, Viareggio, Italy, 16-18.3.1992 (1992) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 4441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=4441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 4441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Dobrowolski, Z.: Analyse der Klassifikations-Systeme (1965) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Ercegovac, Z.; Borko, H.: Design and implementation of an experimental cataloging advisor : Mapper (1992) 0.06
    0.056382082 = product of:
      0.112764165 = sum of:
        0.112764165 = product of:
          0.22552833 = sum of:
            0.22552833 = weight(_text_:z in 5377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22552833 = score(doc=5377,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.94351256 = fieldWeight in 5377, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5377)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications