Search (244 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.04
    0.03792151 = product of:
      0.07584302 = sum of:
        0.07584302 = sum of:
          0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029749434 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
          0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015433006 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
          0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030660577 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  2. Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023) 0.04
    0.03792151 = product of:
      0.07584302 = sum of:
        0.07584302 = sum of:
          0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029749434 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015433006 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030660577 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:05:27
  3. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.04
    0.03792151 = product of:
      0.07584302 = sum of:
        0.07584302 = sum of:
          0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029749434 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015433006 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030660577 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045260075 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  4. Zhao, Y.(C.); Du, J.T.; Pang, N.; Raju, J.; Yan, H.: JASIST special issue on ICT4D and intersections with the information field : guest editorial (2023) 0.03
    0.030121628 = product of:
      0.060243256 = sum of:
        0.060243256 = product of:
          0.09036488 = sum of:
            0.05949887 = weight(_text_:c in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05949887 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
            0.030866012 = weight(_text_:h in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030866012 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.026956873 = product of:
      0.053913746 = sum of:
        0.053913746 = product of:
          0.21565498 = sum of:
            0.21565498 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21565498 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38371542 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  6. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.02
    0.024164006 = product of:
      0.048328012 = sum of:
        0.048328012 = product of:
          0.07249202 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  7. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.02
    0.024164006 = product of:
      0.048328012 = sum of:
        0.048328012 = product of:
          0.07249202 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  8. McDonald, C.; Schmalz, M.; Monheim, A.; Keating, S.; Lewin, K.; Jin, C.; Lee, H.: Describing, organizing, and maintaining video game development artifacts (2021) 0.02
    0.023002025 = product of:
      0.04600405 = sum of:
        0.04600405 = product of:
          0.06900607 = sum of:
            0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486468 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022) 0.02
    0.020136671 = product of:
      0.040273342 = sum of:
        0.040273342 = product of:
          0.06041001 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
            0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030660577 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2022 17:20:22
  10. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.02
    0.020136671 = product of:
      0.040273342 = sum of:
        0.040273342 = product of:
          0.06041001 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
            0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030660577 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  11. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.02
    0.018437434 = product of:
      0.036874868 = sum of:
        0.036874868 = product of:
          0.0553123 = sum of:
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
            0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679269 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
  12. Cho, H.; Disher, T.; Lee, W.-C.; Keating, S.A.; Lee, J.H.: Facet analysis of anime genres : the challenges of defining genre information for popular cultural objects (2020) 0.02
    0.018072978 = product of:
      0.036145955 = sum of:
        0.036145955 = product of:
          0.05421893 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Kang, L.; Tan, C.-H.: Do cognitive and affective expressions matter in purchase conversion? : a live chat perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.018072978 = product of:
      0.036145955 = sum of:
        0.036145955 = product of:
          0.05421893 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Sanfilippo, M.R.; Shvartzshnaider, Y.; Reyes, I.; Nissenbaum, H.; Egelman, S.: Disaster privacy/privacy disaster (2020) 0.02
    0.018072978 = product of:
      0.036145955 = sum of:
        0.036145955 = product of:
          0.05421893 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Privacy expectations during disasters differ significantly from nonemergency situations. This paper explores the actual privacy practices of popular disaster apps, highlighting location information flows. Our empirical study compares content analysis of privacy policies and government agency policies, structured by the contextual integrity framework, with static and dynamic app analysis documenting the personal data sent by 15 apps. We identify substantive gaps between regulation and guidance, privacy policies, and information flows, resulting from ambiguities and exploitation of exemptions. Results also indicate gaps between governance and practice, including the following: (a) Many apps ignore self-defined policies; (b) while some policies state they "might" access location data under certain conditions, those conditions are not met as 12 apps included in our study capture location immediately upon initial launch under default settings; and (c) not all third-party data recipients are identified in policy, including instances that violate expectations of trusted third parties.
  15. Jiang, Y.-C.; Li, H.: ¬The theoretical basis and basic principles of knowledge network construction in digital library (2023) 0.02
    0.018072978 = product of:
      0.036145955 = sum of:
        0.036145955 = product of:
          0.05421893 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.02
    0.017495383 = product of:
      0.034990765 = sum of:
        0.034990765 = product of:
          0.052486144 = sum of:
            0.021825567 = weight(_text_:h in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021825567 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
            0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030660577 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47
  17. Yang, T.-H.; Hsieh, Y.-L.; Liu, S.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Hsu, W.-L.: ¬A flexible template generation and matching method with applications for publication reference metadata extraction (2021) 0.02
    0.017191667 = product of:
      0.034383334 = sum of:
        0.034383334 = product of:
          0.051575 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
            0.021825567 = weight(_text_:h in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021825567 = score(doc=63,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Gu, D.; Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Yang, X.; Li, M.; Lian, C.: ¬A deep learning and clustering-based topic consistency modeling framework for matching health information supply and demand (2024) 0.02
    0.017191667 = product of:
      0.034383334 = sum of:
        0.034383334 = product of:
          0.051575 = sum of:
            0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 1209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029749434 = score(doc=1209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1209)
            0.021825567 = weight(_text_:h in 1209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021825567 = score(doc=1209,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 1209, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1209)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.02
    0.016109336 = product of:
      0.032218672 = sum of:
        0.032218672 = product of:
          0.04832801 = sum of:
            0.023799548 = weight(_text_:c in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023799548 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
            0.02452846 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02452846 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.02
    0.015364528 = product of:
      0.030729055 = sum of:
        0.030729055 = product of:
          0.046093583 = sum of:
            0.015433006 = weight(_text_:h in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015433006 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
            0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030660577 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

Types

  • a 235
  • el 9
  • m 8
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…