Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Liu, A.; Zou, Q.; Chu, W.W.: Configurable indexing and ranking for XML information retrieval (2004) 0.05
    0.052310854 = product of:
      0.10462171 = sum of:
        0.10462171 = product of:
          0.20924342 = sum of:
            0.20924342 = weight(_text_:q in 4114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20924342 = score(doc=4114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.7236124 = fieldWeight in 4114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Wartik, S.; Fox, E.; Heath, L.; Chen, Q.-F.: Hashing algorithms (1992) 0.04
    0.041848686 = product of:
      0.08369737 = sum of:
        0.08369737 = product of:
          0.16739474 = sum of:
            0.16739474 = weight(_text_:q in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16739474 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.57888997 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Chen, Z.; Fu, B.: On the complexity of Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm (2007) 0.04
    0.036989365 = product of:
      0.07397873 = sum of:
        0.07397873 = product of:
          0.14795746 = sum of:
            0.14795746 = weight(_text_:q in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14795746 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.5116713 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm, one of the most important query reformation methods in information retrieval, is essentially an adaptive learning algorithm from examples in searching for documents represented by a linear classifier. Despite its popularity in various applications, there is little rigorous analysis of its learning complexity in literature. In this article, the authors prove for the first time that the learning complexity of Rocchio's algorithm is O(d + d**2(log d + log n)) over the discretized vector space {0, ... , n - 1 }**d when the inner product similarity measure is used. The upper bound on the learning complexity for searching for documents represented by a monotone linear classifier (q, 0) over {0, ... , n - 1 }d can be improved to, at most, 1 + 2k (n - 1) (log d + log(n - 1)), where k is the number of nonzero components in q. Several lower bounds on the learning complexity are also obtained for Rocchio's algorithm. For example, the authors prove that Rocchio's algorithm has a lower bound Omega((d über 2)log n) on its learning complexity over the Boolean vector space {0,1}**d.
  4. Sakai, T.: On the reliability of information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance (2007) 0.03
    0.031386513 = product of:
      0.06277303 = sum of:
        0.06277303 = product of:
          0.12554605 = sum of:
            0.12554605 = weight(_text_:q in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12554605 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper compares 14 information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance, together with 10 traditional metrics based on binary relevance, in terms of stability, sensitivity and resemblance of system rankings. More specifically, we compare these metrics using the Buckley/Voorhees stability method, the Voorhees/Buckley swap method and Kendall's rank correlation, with three data sets comprising test collections and submitted runs from NTCIR. Our experiments show that (Average) Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain at document cut-off l are the best among the rank-based graded-relevance metrics, provided that l is large. On the other hand, if one requires a recall-based graded-relevance metric that is highly correlated with Average Precision, then Q-measure is the best choice. Moreover, these best graded-relevance metrics are at least as stable and sensitive as Average Precision, and are fairly robust to the choice of gain values.
  5. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.03
    0.031386513 = product of:
      0.06277303 = sum of:
        0.06277303 = product of:
          0.12554605 = sum of:
            0.12554605 = weight(_text_:q in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12554605 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Crouch, C.J.; Crouch, D.B.; Chen, Q.; Holtz, S.J.: Improving the retrieval effectiveness of very short queries (2002) 0.03
    0.026155427 = product of:
      0.052310854 = sum of:
        0.052310854 = product of:
          0.10462171 = sum of:
            0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 2572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10462171 = score(doc=2572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 2572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Wei, F.; Li, W.; Lu, Q.; He, Y.: Applying two-level reinforcement ranking in query-oriented multidocument summarization (2009) 0.03
    0.026155427 = product of:
      0.052310854 = sum of:
        0.052310854 = product of:
          0.10462171 = sum of:
            0.10462171 = weight(_text_:q in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10462171 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.023927636 = product of:
      0.047855273 = sum of:
        0.047855273 = product of:
          0.095710546 = sum of:
            0.095710546 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095710546 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  9. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.020936681 = product of:
      0.041873362 = sum of:
        0.041873362 = product of:
          0.083746724 = sum of:
            0.083746724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083746724 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  10. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.020936681 = product of:
      0.041873362 = sum of:
        0.041873362 = product of:
          0.083746724 = sum of:
            0.083746724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083746724 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  11. Hoenkamp, E.; Bruza, P.D.; Song, D.; Huang, Q.: ¬An effective approach to verbose queries using a limited dependencies language model (2009) 0.02
    0.020924343 = product of:
      0.041848686 = sum of:
        0.041848686 = product of:
          0.08369737 = sum of:
            0.08369737 = weight(_text_:q in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08369737 = score(doc=2122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28916505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.28944498 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = product of:
          0.07178291 = sum of:
            0.07178291 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07178291 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  13. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.017945727 = product of:
      0.035891455 = sum of:
        0.035891455 = product of:
          0.07178291 = sum of:
            0.07178291 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07178291 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  14. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.011963818 = product of:
      0.023927636 = sum of:
        0.023927636 = product of:
          0.047855273 = sum of:
            0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047855273 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  15. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.011963818 = product of:
      0.023927636 = sum of:
        0.023927636 = product of:
          0.047855273 = sum of:
            0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047855273 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  16. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.011963818 = product of:
      0.023927636 = sum of:
        0.023927636 = product of:
          0.047855273 = sum of:
            0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047855273 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  17. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.011963818 = product of:
      0.023927636 = sum of:
        0.023927636 = product of:
          0.047855273 = sum of:
            0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047855273 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  18. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.011963818 = product of:
      0.023927636 = sum of:
        0.023927636 = product of:
          0.047855273 = sum of:
            0.047855273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047855273 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  19. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01
    0.010574621 = product of:
      0.021149242 = sum of:
        0.021149242 = product of:
          0.042298485 = sum of:
            0.042298485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042298485 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  20. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.0104683405 = product of:
      0.020936681 = sum of:
        0.020936681 = product of:
          0.041873362 = sum of:
            0.041873362 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041873362 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15461078 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04415143 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Years

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 4

Types

  • a 35
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…