Search (4759 results, page 1 of 238)

  1. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.21 
    0.20788144 = product of:
  0.41576287 = sum of:
    0.26147842 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26147842 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.15428445 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15428445 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.20 
    0.19848752 = product of:
  0.39697504 = sum of:
    0.3391184 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3391184 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.60339415 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Zitt, M.: Meso-level retrieval : IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation (2015) 0.18 
    0.18183255 = product of:
  0.7273302 = sum of:
    0.7273302 = weight(_text_:2223 in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7273302 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6844896 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        1.0625876 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2223-2245
  4. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.17 
    0.1695592 = product of:
  0.6782368 = sum of:
    0.6782368 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6782368 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.60339415 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  5. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.17 
    0.16540629 = product of:
  0.33081257 = sum of:
    0.28259867 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28259867 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.60339415 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.04821389 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04821389 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  6. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.15 
    0.14901997 = product of:
  0.29803994 = sum of:
    0.24018328 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24018328 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  7. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.14 
    0.14129934 = product of:
  0.56519735 = sum of:
    0.56519735 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.56519735 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.60339415 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  8. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.14 
    0.13966519 = product of:
  0.27933037 = sum of:
    0.23111649 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23111649 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.04821389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04821389 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
  9. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.13 
    0.13282028 = product of:
  0.26564056 = sum of:
    0.19814111 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19814111 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.13 
    0.13282028 = product of:
  0.26564056 = sum of:
    0.19814111 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19814111 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  11. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.13 
    0.12698275 = product of:
  0.2539655 = sum of:
    0.19610883 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19610883 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  12. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012) 0.12 
    0.12418331 = product of:
  0.24836662 = sum of:
    0.20015272 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20015272 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
    0.04821389 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04821389 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
  13. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.11 
    0.11464049 = product of:
  0.22928098 = sum of:
    0.16178153 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16178153 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  14. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.11 
    0.11464049 = product of:
  0.22928098 = sum of:
    0.16178153 = weight(_text_:authors in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16178153 = score(doc=3030,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The theory of diffusion can be successfully applied to scientific information dissemination by identifying space with a series of successive authors, and potential (temperature) with the interest of new authors towards earlier published papers, measured by the number of citations. As the total number of citation equals the number of references, the conservation law is fulfilled and Fourier's parabolic differential equation can be applied
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
  15. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.11 
    0.11464049 = product of:
  0.22928098 = sum of:
    0.16178153 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16178153 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  16. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.11 
    0.11464049 = product of:
  0.22928098 = sum of:
    0.16178153 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16178153 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.067499444 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067499444 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.11 
    0.11384595 = product of:
  0.2276919 = sum of:
    0.16983524 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16983524 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  18. Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016) 0.11 
    0.11384595 = product of:
  0.2276919 = sum of:
    0.16983524 = weight(_text_:authors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16983524 = score(doc=2925,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:02:22
  19. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.11 
    0.11384595 = product of:
  0.2276919 = sum of:
    0.16983524 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16983524 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3244584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.057856664 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057856664 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24923104 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  20. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.11 
    0.11303947 = product of:
  0.45215788 = sum of:
    0.45215788 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45215788 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.60339415 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07117166 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 4026
  • m 443
  • el 208
  • s 183
  • b 40
  • x 37
  • i 24
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • d 4
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • ag 1
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications