Search (6930 results, page 1 of 347)

0.1713584 = product of:
  0.3427168 = sum of:
    0.3427168 = sum of:
      0.12861268 = weight(_text_:y in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12861268 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.14600362 = weight(_text_:n in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14600362 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.67369634 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.068100505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068100505 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 8.1998 12:51:22

Source

Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella

0.17128329 = product of:
  0.34256658 = sum of:
    0.34256658 = product of:
      0.51384985 = sum of:
        0.35040867 = weight(_text_:n in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35040867 = score(doc=4632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            1.6168711 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
        0.1634412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1634412 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21.12.2018 14:04:22

0.14129058 = product of:
  0.28258115 = sum of:
    0.28258115 = sum of:
      0.14550865 = weight(_text_:y in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14550865 = score(doc=1144,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.60155004 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.082592115 = weight(_text_:n in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082592115 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.0544804 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0544804 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.12.2007 11:22:39

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.13815036 = sum of:
  0.02885387 = product of:
    0.11541548 = sum of:
      0.11541548 = weight(_text_:authors in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11541548 = score(doc=4370,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.109296486 = product of:
    0.16394472 = sum of:
      0.090942904 = weight(_text_:y in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090942904 = score(doc=4370,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
      0.07300181 = weight(_text_:n in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07300181 = score(doc=4370,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology which discriminates the articles by the target authors ("true" articles) from those by other homonymous authors ("false" articles). Author name searches for 2,595 "source" authors in six subject fields retrieved about 629,000 articles. In order to extract true articles from the large amount of the retrieved articles, including many false ones, two filtering stages were applied. At the first stage any retrieved article was eliminated as false if either its affiliation addresses had little similarity to those of its source article or there was no citation relationship between the journal of the retrieved article and that of its source article. At the second stage, a sample of retrieved articles was subjected to manual judgment, and utilizing the judgment results, discrimination functions based on logistic regression were defined. These discrimination functions demonstrated both the recall ratio and the precision of about 95% and the accuracy (correct answer ratio) of 90-95%. Existence of common coauthor(s), address similarity, title words similarity, and interjournal citation relationships between the retrieved and source articles were found to be the effective discrimination predictors. Whether or not the source author was from a specific country was also one of the important predictors. Furthermore, it was shown that a retrieved article is almost certainly true if it was cited by, or cocited with, its source article. The method proposed in this study would be effective when dealing with a large number of articles whose subject fields and affiliation addresses vary widely.

0.13432984 = sum of:
  0.024483321 = product of:
    0.097933285 = sum of:
      0.097933285 = weight(_text_:authors in 3078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.097933285 = score(doc=3078,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3078, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3078)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.109846525 = product of:
    0.16476978 = sum of:
      0.077167615 = weight(_text_:y in 3078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.077167615 = score(doc=3078,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3078, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3078)
      0.08760217 = weight(_text_:n in 3078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08760217 = score(doc=3078,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 3078, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3078)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The increasing abundance of digital textual archives provides an opportunity for understanding human social systems. Yet the literature has not adequately considered the disparate social processes by which texts are produced. Drawing on communication theory, we identify three common processes by which documents might be detectably similar in their textual features-authors sharing subject matter, sharing goals, and sharing sources. We hypothesize that these processes produce distinct, detectable relationships between authors in different kinds of textual overlap. We develop a novel n-gram extraction technique to capture such signatures based on n-grams of different lengths. We test the hypothesis on a corpus where the author attributes are observable: the public statements of the members of the U.S. Congress. This article presents the first empirical finding that shows different social relationships are detectable through the structure of overlapping textual features. Our study has important implications for designing text modeling techniques to make sense of social phenomena from aggregate digital traces.

0.1278675 = product of:
  0.255735 = sum of:
    0.255735 = product of:
      0.51147 = sum of:
        0.1995806 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1995806 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42613703 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.31188944 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31188944 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.53270954 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.

0.122726955 = sum of:
  0.029985823 = product of:
    0.11994329 = sum of:
      0.11994329 = weight(_text_:authors in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11994329 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09274113 = product of:
    0.1391117 = sum of:
      0.077167615 = weight(_text_:y in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.077167615 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.061944086 = weight(_text_:n in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061944086 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Big Science and cross-disciplinary collaborations have reshaped the intellectual structure of research areas. A number of works have tried to uncover this hidden intellectual structure by analyzing citation contexts. However, none of them analyzed by document logical structures such as sections. The two major goals of this study are to find characteristics of authors who are highly cited section-wise and to identify the differences in section-wise author networks. This study uses 29,158 of research articles culled from the ACL Anthology, which hosts articles on computational linguistics and natural language processing. We find that the distribution of citations across sections is skewed and that a different set of highly cited authors share distinct academic characteristics, according to their citation locations. Furthermore, the author networks based on citation context similarity reveal that the intellectual structure of a domain differs across different sections.

0.120363355 = sum of:
  0.028563874 = product of:
    0.114255495 = sum of:
      0.114255495 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.114255495 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09179948 = product of:
    0.13769922 = sum of:
      0.090028875 = weight(_text_:y in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090028875 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
      0.04767035 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04767035 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.

Date

22. 7.2006 15:05:39

0.11239973 = product of:
  0.22479945 = sum of:
    0.22479945 = sum of:
      0.06430634 = weight(_text_:y in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06430634 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
      0.12644285 = weight(_text_:n in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12644285 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.58343816 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
      0.034050252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034050252 = score(doc=2456,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The use of non-English Web search engines has been prevalent. Given the popularity of Chinese Web searching and the unique characteristics of Chinese language, it is imperative to conduct studies with focuses on the analysis of Chinese Web search queries. In this paper, we report our research on the character usage of Chinese search logs from a Web search engine in Hong Kong. By examining the distribution of search query terms, we found that users tended to use more diversified terms and that the usage of characters in search queries was quite different from the character usage of general online information in Chinese. After studying the Zipf distribution of n-grams with different values of n, we found that the curve of unigram is the most curved one of all while the bigram curve follows the Zipf distribution best, and that the curves of n-grams with larger n (n = 3-6) had similar structures with ?-values in the range of 0.66-0.86. The distribution of combined n-grams was also studied. All the analyses are performed on the data both before and after the removal of function terms and incomplete terms and similar findings are revealed. We believe the findings from this study have provided some insights into further research in non-English Web searching and will assist in the design of more effective Chinese Web search engines.

Date

22.11.2008 17:57:22

0.11005345 = sum of:
  0.017312322 = product of:
    0.06924929 = sum of:
      0.06924929 = weight(_text_:authors in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06924929 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.09274113 = product of:
    0.1391117 = sum of:
      0.077167615 = weight(_text_:y in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.077167615 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.061944086 = weight(_text_:n in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061944086 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The authors report on a series of experiments to automate the assessment of document qualities such as depth and objectivity. The primary purpose is to develop a quality-sensitive functionality, orthogonal to relevance, to select documents for an interactive question-answering system. The study consisted of two stages. In the classifier construction stage, nine document qualities deemed important by information professionals were identified and classifiers were developed to predict their values. In the confirmative evaluation stage, the performance of the developed methods was checked using a different document collection. The quality prediction methods worked well in the second stage. The results strongly suggest that the best way to predict document qualities automatically is to construct classifiers on a person-by-person basis.

0.10819799 = product of:
  0.21639597 = sum of:
    0.21639597 = product of:
      0.32459396 = sum of:
        0.18005775 = weight(_text_:y in 6228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18005775 = score(doc=6228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 6228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6228)
        0.1445362 = weight(_text_:n in 6228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1445362 = score(doc=6228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.6669253 = fieldWeight in 6228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6228)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1031686 = sum of:
  0.024483321 = product of:
    0.097933285 = sum of:
      0.097933285 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.097933285 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.078685276 = product of:
    0.11802791 = sum of:
      0.077167615 = weight(_text_:y in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.077167615 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.0408603 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0408603 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.

Date

21. 3.2023 19:22:14

0.10015668 = sum of:
  0.02019771 = product of:
    0.08079084 = sum of:
      0.08079084 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08079084 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.07995897 = product of:
    0.11993845 = sum of:
      0.0722681 = weight(_text_:n in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0722681 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.04767035 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04767035 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.

Date

8. 1.2007 12:29:22

0.099961974 = sum of:
  0.024988187 = product of:
    0.09995275 = sum of:
      0.09995275 = weight(_text_:authors in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09995275 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.074973784 = product of:
    0.11246067 = sum of:
      0.06430634 = weight(_text_:y in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06430634 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.048154328 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048154328 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish

Date

30. 1.1999 17:22:22

0.09504199 = product of:
  0.19008398 = sum of:
    0.19008398 = product of:
      0.28512597 = sum of:
        0.18188581 = weight(_text_:y in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18188581 = score(doc=1101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2418895 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.75193757 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
        0.10324015 = weight(_text_:n in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10324015 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.09312277 = product of:
  0.18624555 = sum of:
    0.18624555 = product of:
      0.2793683 = sum of:
        0.1445362 = weight(_text_:n in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1445362 = score(doc=8727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.6669253 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
        0.13483211 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13483211 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 8.2001 12:22:47

Source

Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22

0.09301958 = sum of:
  0.024483321 = product of:
    0.097933285 = sum of:
      0.097933285 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.097933285 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2291433 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.06853626 = product of:
    0.102804385 = sum of:
      0.061944086 = weight(_text_:n in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061944086 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.0408603 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0408603 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050263796 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:56

0.091381684 = product of:
  0.18276337 = sum of:
    0.18276337 = product of:
      0.27414504 = sum of:
        0.16518423 = weight(_text_:n in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518423 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.76220036 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
        0.1089608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089608 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 1.1999 10:29:22

0.091381684 = product of:
  0.18276337 = sum of:
    0.18276337 = product of:
      0.27414504 = sum of:
        0.16518423 = weight(_text_:n in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518423 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.76220036 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
        0.1089608 = weight(_text_:22 in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089608 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Biographed

Bourbaki, N.

Source

Mathematical intelligencer. 7(1985), S.18-22

0.091381684 = product of:
  0.18276337 = sum of:
    0.18276337 = product of:
      0.27414504 = sum of:
        0.16518423 = weight(_text_:n in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518423 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21672022 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.76220036 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
        0.1089608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089608 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17601524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050263796 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75