-
Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012)
0.14
0.13808186 = sum of:
0.020730553 = product of:
0.08292221 = sum of:
0.08292221 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08292221 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.117351316 = sum of:
0.06533947 = weight(_text_:y in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06533947 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
0.017414553 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017414553 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
0.034597293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034597293 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
- Abstract
- This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.12992178 = product of:
0.25984356 = sum of:
0.25984356 = product of:
0.5196871 = sum of:
0.20278698 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20278698 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4329832 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.31690013 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31690013 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5412679 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.12
0.12229708 = sum of:
0.029022772 = product of:
0.11609109 = sum of:
0.11609109 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11609109 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.09327431 = product of:
0.13991146 = sum of:
0.09147525 = weight(_text_:y in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09147525 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.04843621 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04843621 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.12
0.115532644 = product of:
0.23106529 = sum of:
0.23106529 = sum of:
0.14784634 = weight(_text_:y in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14784634 = score(doc=1144,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.60155004 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.027863283 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027863283 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.055355668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055355668 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.12
0.11506153 = sum of:
0.04308764 = product of:
0.17235056 = sum of:
0.17235056 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17235056 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07197389 = product of:
0.107960835 = sum of:
0.07840736 = weight(_text_:y in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07840736 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.029553473 = weight(_text_:h in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029553473 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
-
Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, J.; Liang, X.; Gao, G.; Zhao, Y.: Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career (2018)
0.11
0.112596676 = sum of:
0.020730553 = product of:
0.08292221 = sum of:
0.08292221 = weight(_text_:authors in 4012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08292221 = score(doc=4012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4012)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.09186612 = product of:
0.13779917 = sum of:
0.11317128 = weight(_text_:y in 4012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11317128 = score(doc=4012,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 4012, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4012)
0.024627896 = weight(_text_:h in 4012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024627896 = score(doc=4012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4012)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Scientific collaboration is vital to many fields, and it is common to see scholars seek out experienced researchers or experts in a domain with whom they can share knowledge, experience, and resources. To explore the diversity of research collaborations, this article performs a temporal analysis on the scientific careers of researchers in the field of computer science. Specifically, we analyze collaborators using 2 indicators: the research topic diversity, measured by the Author-Conference-Topic model and cosine, and the impact diversity, measured by the normalized standard deviation of h-indices. We find that the collaborators of high-impact researchers tend to study diverse research topics and have diverse h-indices. Moreover, by setting PhD graduation as an important milestone in researchers' careers, we examine several indicators related to scientific collaboration and their effects on a career. The results show that collaborating with authoritative authors plays an important role prior to a researcher's PhD graduation, but working with non-authoritative authors carries more weight after PhD graduation.
-
Ye, F.Y.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The "academic trace" of the performance matrix : a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) (2014)
0.11
0.11109047 = sum of:
0.014658714 = product of:
0.058634855 = sum of:
0.058634855 = weight(_text_:authors in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058634855 = score(doc=1237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.096431755 = product of:
0.14464763 = sum of:
0.09240396 = weight(_text_:y in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09240396 = score(doc=1237,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
0.052243657 = weight(_text_:h in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052243657 = score(doc=1237,freq=18.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.41174316 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The h-index provides us with 9 natural classes which can be written as a matrix of 3 vectors. The 3 vectors are: X = (X1, X2, X3) and indicates publication distribution in the h-core, the h-tail, and the uncited ones, respectively; Y = (Y1, Y2, Y3) denotes the citation distribution of the h-core, the h-tail and the so-called "excess" citations (above the h-threshold), respectively; and Z = (Z1, Z2, Z3) = (Y1-X1, Y2-X2, Y3-X3). The matrix V = (X,Y,Z)T constructs a measure of academic performance, in which the 9 numbers can all be provided with meanings in different dimensions. The "academic trace" tr(V) of this matrix follows naturally, and contributes a unique indicator for total academic achievements by summarizing and weighting the accumulation of publications and citations. This measure can also be used to combine the advantages of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) into a single number with a meaningful interpretation of the values. We illustrate the use of tr(V) for the cases of 2 journal sets, 2 universities, and ourselves as 2 individual authors.
- Object
- h-index
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.10
0.10482607 = sum of:
0.024876662 = product of:
0.09950665 = sum of:
0.09950665 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09950665 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07994941 = product of:
0.11992411 = sum of:
0.07840736 = weight(_text_:y in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07840736 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.04151675 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151675 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Onodera, N.; Iwasawa, M.; Midorikawa, N.; Yoshikane, F.; Amano, K.; Ootani, Y.; Kodama, T.; Kiyama, Y.; Tsunoda, H.; Yamazaki, S.: ¬A method for eliminating articles by homonymous authors from the large number of articles retrieved by author search (2011)
0.10
0.10252978 = sum of:
0.029317427 = product of:
0.11726971 = sum of:
0.11726971 = weight(_text_:authors in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11726971 = score(doc=4370,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07321235 = product of:
0.10981852 = sum of:
0.09240396 = weight(_text_:y in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09240396 = score(doc=4370,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
0.017414553 = weight(_text_:h in 4370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017414553 = score(doc=4370,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4370, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4370)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes a methodology which discriminates the articles by the target authors ("true" articles) from those by other homonymous authors ("false" articles). Author name searches for 2,595 "source" authors in six subject fields retrieved about 629,000 articles. In order to extract true articles from the large amount of the retrieved articles, including many false ones, two filtering stages were applied. At the first stage any retrieved article was eliminated as false if either its affiliation addresses had little similarity to those of its source article or there was no citation relationship between the journal of the retrieved article and that of its source article. At the second stage, a sample of retrieved articles was subjected to manual judgment, and utilizing the judgment results, discrimination functions based on logistic regression were defined. These discrimination functions demonstrated both the recall ratio and the precision of about 95% and the accuracy (correct answer ratio) of 90-95%. Existence of common coauthor(s), address similarity, title words similarity, and interjournal citation relationships between the retrieved and source articles were found to be the effective discrimination predictors. Whether or not the source author was from a specific country was also one of the important predictors. Furthermore, it was shown that a retrieved article is almost certainly true if it was cited by, or cocited with, its source article. The method proposed in this study would be effective when dealing with a large number of articles whose subject fields and affiliation addresses vary widely.
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.10
0.101567924 = sum of:
0.02538964 = product of:
0.10155856 = sum of:
0.10155856 = weight(_text_:authors in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10155856 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07617828 = product of:
0.114267424 = sum of:
0.06533947 = weight(_text_:y in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06533947 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.04892796 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04892796 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Wu, H.; He, J.; Pei, Y.: Scientific impact at the topic level : a case study in computational linguistics (2010)
0.10
0.097759284 = sum of:
0.020522198 = product of:
0.08208879 = sum of:
0.08208879 = weight(_text_:authors in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08208879 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.077237085 = product of:
0.11585562 = sum of:
0.09147525 = weight(_text_:y in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09147525 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.024380373 = weight(_text_:h in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024380373 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, we propose to apply the topic model and topic-level eigenfactor (TEF) algorithm to assess the relative importance of academic entities including articles, authors, journals, and conferences. Scientific impact is measured by the biased PageRank score toward topics created by the latent topic model. The TEF metric considers the impact of an academic entity in multiple granular views as well as in a global view. Experiments on a computational linguistics corpus show that the method is a useful and promising measure to assess scientific impact.
-
Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011)
0.10
0.096670784 = sum of:
0.030467564 = product of:
0.12187026 = sum of:
0.12187026 = weight(_text_:authors in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12187026 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.06620322 = product of:
0.099304825 = sum of:
0.07840736 = weight(_text_:y in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07840736 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.020897461 = weight(_text_:h in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020897461 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
-
Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997)
0.09
0.09388105 = product of:
0.1877621 = sum of:
0.1877621 = sum of:
0.10454315 = weight(_text_:y in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10454315 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.027863283 = weight(_text_:h in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027863283 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.055355668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055355668 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.09
0.09075747 = sum of:
0.07922503 = product of:
0.31690013 = sum of:
0.31690013 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31690013 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5412679 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0115324315 = product of:
0.034597293 = sum of:
0.034597293 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034597293 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Jahns, Y.: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß (2007)
0.09
0.088270955 = product of:
0.17654191 = sum of:
0.17654191 = product of:
0.26481286 = sum of:
0.2090863 = weight(_text_:y in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2090863 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.055726565 = weight(_text_:h in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055726565 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 19(2007) H.2, S.xx-xx
-
Bar-Hillel, Y.: Wesen und Bedeutung der Informationstheorie (1971)
0.09
0.088270955 = product of:
0.17654191 = sum of:
0.17654191 = product of:
0.26481286 = sum of:
0.2090863 = weight(_text_:y in 2440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2090863 = score(doc=2440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 2440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2440)
0.055726565 = weight(_text_:h in 2440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055726565 = score(doc=2440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 2440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2440)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Informationen über Information: Probleme der Kybernetik. Hrsg.: H. von Ditfurth
-
Sano, H.; Fujiwara, Y.: Syntactic and semantic structure analysis of article titles in analytic chemistry (1993)
0.09
0.088270955 = product of:
0.17654191 = sum of:
0.17654191 = product of:
0.26481286 = sum of:
0.2090863 = weight(_text_:y in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2090863 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.055726565 = weight(_text_:h in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055726565 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12688409 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lara, M.G.L. de: Ciencias del lenguaje, terminología y ciencia de la información : relaciones interdisciplinarias y transdisciplinariedad (2007)
0.09
0.08814733 = product of:
0.17629465 = sum of:
0.17629465 = product of:
0.26444197 = sum of:
0.2090863 = weight(_text_:y in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2090863 = score(doc=1105,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
0.055355668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055355668 = score(doc=1105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.12.2007 19:28:22
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023)
0.09
0.08735506 = sum of:
0.020730553 = product of:
0.08292221 = sum of:
0.08292221 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08292221 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23282464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.06662451 = product of:
0.09993676 = sum of:
0.06533947 = weight(_text_:y in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06533947 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.034597293 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034597293 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17884305 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:56
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.09
0.08697188 = sum of:
0.06083609 = product of:
0.24334437 = sum of:
0.24334437 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24334437 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4329832 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.026135787 = product of:
0.07840736 = sum of:
0.07840736 = weight(_text_:y in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07840736 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24577563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.051071316 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
