Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Sprachretrieval"
  1. Lin, J.; Katz, B.: Building a reusable test collection for question answering (2006) 0.04 
    0.035585865 = sum of:
  0.018049048 = product of:
    0.07219619 = sum of:
      0.07219619 = weight(_text_:authors in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07219619 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052402776 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017536815 = product of:
    0.03507363 = sum of:
      0.03507363 = weight(_text_:j in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03507363 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052402776 = queryNorm
          0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In contrast to traditional information retrieval systems, which return ranked lists of documents that users must manually browse through, a question answering system attempts to directly answer natural language questions posed by the user. Although such systems possess language-processing capabilities, they still rely on traditional document retrieval techniques to generate an initial candidate set of documents. In this article, the authors argue that document retrieval for question answering represents a task different from retrieving documents in response to more general retrospective information needs. Thus, to guide future system development, specialized question answering test collections must be constructed. They show that the current evaluation resources have major shortcomings; to remedy the situation, they have manually created a small, reusable question answering test collection for research purposes. In this article they describe their methodology for building this test collection and discuss issues they encountered regarding the notion of "answer correctness."
  2. Marx, J.: ¬Die '¬Computer-Talk-These' in der Sprachgenerierung : Hinweise zur Gestaltung natürlichsprachlicher Zustandsanzeigen in multimodalen Informationssystemen (1996) 0.02 
    0.017536815 = product of:
  0.03507363 = sum of:
    0.03507363 = product of:
      0.07014726 = sum of:
        0.07014726 = weight(_text_:j in 7294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07014726 = score(doc=7294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052402776 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7294)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Nhongkai, S.N.; Bentz, H.-J.: Bilinguale Suche mittels Konzeptnetzen (2006) 0.01 
    0.01169121 = product of:
  0.02338242 = sum of:
    0.02338242 = product of:
      0.04676484 = sum of:
        0.04676484 = weight(_text_:j in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04676484 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052402776 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Srihari, R.K.: Using speech input for image interpretation, annotation, and retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.010649779 = product of:
  0.021299558 = sum of:
    0.021299558 = product of:
      0.042599116 = sum of:
        0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042599116 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052402776 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  5. Pomerantz, J.: ¬A linguistic analysis of question taxonomies (2005) 0.01 
    0.010229808 = product of:
  0.020459617 = sum of:
    0.020459617 = product of:
      0.040919233 = sum of:
        0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040919233 = score(doc=3465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052402776 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes