-
Rees, A.M.; Schultz, D.G.A.: ¬A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching : vol.1, final report (1966)
0.21
0.21480311 = product of:
0.42960623 = sum of:
0.42960623 = product of:
0.85921246 = sum of:
0.85921246 = weight(_text_:d.g.a in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.85921246 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5048091 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
1.7020543 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.12
0.11670561 = product of:
0.23341122 = sum of:
0.23341122 = product of:
0.46682245 = sum of:
0.18215866 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18215866 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3889384 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.2846638 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2846638 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.48620793 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.09
0.09186089 = sum of:
0.042136222 = product of:
0.16854489 = sum of:
0.16854489 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16854489 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.04972467 = product of:
0.09944934 = sum of:
0.09944934 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09944934 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.09
0.08670491 = sum of:
0.07116595 = product of:
0.2846638 = sum of:
0.2846638 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2846638 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.48620793 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015538959 = product of:
0.031077918 = sum of:
0.031077918 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031077918 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.07
0.07329435 = sum of:
0.0546476 = product of:
0.2185904 = sum of:
0.2185904 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2185904 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3889384 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018646749 = product of:
0.037293497 = sum of:
0.037293497 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037293497 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
#220
0.06
0.061531138 = product of:
0.123062275 = sum of:
0.123062275 = product of:
0.24612455 = sum of:
0.24612455 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24612455 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 20:02:22
-
#1387
0.06
0.061531138 = product of:
0.123062275 = sum of:
0.123062275 = product of:
0.24612455 = sum of:
0.24612455 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24612455 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 20:02:22
-
#2103
0.06
0.061531138 = product of:
0.123062275 = sum of:
0.123062275 = product of:
0.24612455 = sum of:
0.24612455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24612455 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 20:02:22
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.06
0.061078623 = sum of:
0.045539666 = product of:
0.18215866 = sum of:
0.18215866 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18215866 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3889384 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015538959 = product of:
0.031077918 = sum of:
0.031077918 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031077918 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.06
0.057351343 = sum of:
0.038704593 = product of:
0.15481837 = sum of:
0.15481837 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15481837 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018646749 = product of:
0.037293497 = sum of:
0.037293497 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037293497 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.05
0.0546476 = product of:
0.1092952 = sum of:
0.1092952 = product of:
0.4371808 = sum of:
0.4371808 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4371808 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3889384 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.05
0.0536842 = sum of:
0.03192966 = product of:
0.12771864 = sum of:
0.12771864 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12771864 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02175454 = product of:
0.04350908 = sum of:
0.04350908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350908 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.05
0.0536842 = sum of:
0.03192966 = product of:
0.12771864 = sum of:
0.12771864 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12771864 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02175454 = product of:
0.04350908 = sum of:
0.04350908 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350908 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
-
Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018)
0.05
0.052782476 = sum of:
0.037243515 = product of:
0.14897406 = sum of:
0.14897406 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14897406 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015538959 = product of:
0.031077918 = sum of:
0.031077918 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031077918 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.05
0.050248913 = sum of:
0.031602167 = product of:
0.12640867 = sum of:
0.12640867 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12640867 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018646749 = product of:
0.037293497 = sum of:
0.037293497 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037293497 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.05
0.049200166 = sum of:
0.018434597 = product of:
0.07373839 = sum of:
0.07373839 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07373839 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.030765569 = product of:
0.061531138 = sum of:
0.061531138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061531138 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.05
0.048716597 = sum of:
0.022346107 = product of:
0.08938443 = sum of:
0.08938443 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08938443 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.026370488 = product of:
0.052740976 = sum of:
0.052740976 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052740976 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.05
0.047824997 = sum of:
0.026070457 = product of:
0.10428183 = sum of:
0.10428183 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10428183 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02175454 = product of:
0.04350908 = sum of:
0.04350908 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350908 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997)
0.05
0.047824997 = sum of:
0.026070457 = product of:
0.10428183 = sum of:
0.10428183 = weight(_text_:authors in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10428183 = score(doc=3030,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02175454 = product of:
0.04350908 = sum of:
0.04350908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350908 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The theory of diffusion can be successfully applied to scientific information dissemination by identifying space with a series of successive authors, and potential (temperature) with the interest of new authors towards earlier published papers, measured by the number of citations. As the total number of citation equals the number of references, the conservation law is fulfilled and Fourier's parabolic differential equation can be applied
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:16:11
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.047824997 = sum of:
0.026070457 = product of:
0.10428183 = sum of:
0.10428183 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10428183 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20914078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02175454 = product of:
0.04350908 = sum of:
0.04350908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350908 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16065042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045876138 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
