Search (5626 results, page 1 of 282)

  1. Analyses of bibliographies (1973) 0.20 
    0.20063542 = product of:
  0.40127084 = sum of:
    0.40127084 = product of:
      0.60190624 = sum of:
        0.5370055 = weight(_text_:h.r in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5370055 = score(doc=3846,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.464687 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
        0.06490076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06490076 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future
    Editor
    Simon, H.R.
    Source
    Library trends. 22(1973), no.1
  2. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.12 
    0.12185958 = product of:
  0.24371916 = sum of:
    0.24371916 = product of:
      0.48743832 = sum of:
        0.19020317 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19020317 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40611473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.29723513 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29723513 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5076799 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  3. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.11 
    0.114708014 = sum of:
  0.027221782 = product of:
    0.10888713 = sum of:
      0.10888713 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10888713 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21837686 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.08748623 = product of:
    0.13122934 = sum of:
      0.085798815 = weight(_text_:y in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.085798815 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
      0.045430534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045430534 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  4. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.10 
    0.098321155 = sum of:
  0.023332957 = product of:
    0.09333183 = sum of:
      0.09333183 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09333183 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21837686 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0749882 = product of:
    0.112482294 = sum of:
      0.07354184 = weight(_text_:y in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07354184 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.038940456 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038940456 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  5. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.10 
    0.0952652 = sum of:
  0.023814103 = product of:
    0.09525641 = sum of:
      0.09525641 = weight(_text_:authors in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09525641 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21837686 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0714511 = product of:
    0.10717664 = sum of:
      0.06128487 = weight(_text_:y in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06128487 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.04589177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04589177 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  6. Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tsai, Y.-H.R.; Yau, S.-T.: Investigating the role of eye movements and physiological signals in search satisfaction prediction using geometric analysis (2019) 0.09 
    0.087056205 = product of:
  0.17411241 = sum of:
    0.17411241 = product of:
      0.2611686 = sum of:
        0.10614851 = weight(_text_:y in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10614851 = score(doc=5382,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
        0.1550201 = weight(_text_:h.r in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1550201 = score(doc=5382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.42281866 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09 
    0.08512558 = sum of:
  0.07430878 = product of:
    0.29723513 = sum of:
      0.29723513 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.29723513 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5076799 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.010816794 = product of:
    0.03245038 = sum of:
      0.03245038 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03245038 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  8. Linke, D.B.; Bühl, W.; Maturana, H.: Autopoiesis : eine Theorie im Brennpunkt der Kritik (1993) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 1332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=1332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 1332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1332)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Fischer, H.R.
  9. C.A. Cutter's two-figure author table (1969) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=2719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    Chicopee, MA : H.R. Huntting
  10. C.A. Cutter's three-figure author table (1969) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    Chicopee, MA : H.R. Huntting
  11. Tibbo, H.R.: Information systems, services, and technology for the humanities (1991) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=3931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Croft, W.B.; Turtle, H.R.: Retrieval strategies for hypertext (1993) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Ernest, D.J.; Lange, H.R.; Herring, D.: ¬An online comparison of three library science databases (1988) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 8304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=8304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 8304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8304)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Meadow, C.T.; Meadow, H.R.: Organization, maintenance and search of machine files (1970) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Ramsey, H.R.; Grimes, J.D.: Human factors in interactive computer dialog (1983) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Lange, H.R.; Winkler, B.J.: Taming the Internet : metadata, a work in progress (1997) 0.08 
    0.082677394 = product of:
  0.16535479 = sum of:
    0.16535479 = product of:
      0.49606434 = sum of:
        0.49606434 = weight(_text_:h.r in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49606434 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36663496 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            1.3530197 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.653836 = idf(docFreq=56, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Lara, M.G.L. de: Ciencias del lenguaje, terminología y ciencia de la información : relaciones interdisciplinarias y transdisciplinariedad (2007) 0.08 
    0.0826774 = product of:
  0.1653548 = sum of:
    0.1653548 = product of:
      0.2480322 = sum of:
        0.19611159 = weight(_text_:y in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19611159 = score(doc=1105,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.8507202 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
        0.05192061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05192061 = score(doc=1105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047902122 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.12.2007 19:28:22
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  18. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.08 
    0.081934296 = sum of:
  0.019444132 = product of:
    0.07777653 = sum of:
      0.07777653 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07777653 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21837686 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.062490165 = product of:
    0.09373525 = sum of:
      0.06128487 = weight(_text_:y in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06128487 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.03245038 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03245038 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  19. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.08 
    0.081934296 = sum of:
  0.019444132 = product of:
    0.07777653 = sum of:
      0.07777653 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07777653 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21837686 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.062490165 = product of:
    0.09373525 = sum of:
      0.06128487 = weight(_text_:y in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06128487 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.03245038 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03245038 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16774507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  20. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.08 
    0.0815749 = sum of:
  0.05706095 = product of:
    0.2282438 = sum of:
      0.2282438 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2282438 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40611473 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024513949 = product of:
    0.07354184 = sum of:
      0.07354184 = weight(_text_:y in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07354184 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23052418 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047902122 = queryNorm
          0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications