Search (137 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Schäpers, K.: Umfang und Grenzen des Informationsdienstes in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken : Empfehlungen und Diskussionen (1991) 0.02 
    0.020315586 = product of:
  0.07110455 = sum of:
    0.056149498 = weight(_text_:und in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056149498 = score(doc=3725,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
    0.014955049 = weight(_text_:in in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014955049 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  2. Ethik in Wissenschaft und Technik : Erfahrungen und Perspektiven im interdisziplinären Dialog (1994) 0.02 
    0.020315586 = product of:
  0.07110455 = sum of:
    0.056149498 = weight(_text_:und in 5147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056149498 = score(doc=5147,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 5147, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5147)
    0.014955049 = weight(_text_:in in 5147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014955049 = score(doc=5147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5147)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  3. Ethik der Informationsgesellschaft : Privatheit und Datenschutz, Nachhaltigkeit, Human-, Sozial- und Naturverträglichkeit, Interessen- und Wertekonflikte, Urheber- und Menschenrechte (2005) 0.02 
    0.019061584 = product of:
  0.06671554 = sum of:
    0.060172707 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060172707 = score(doc=1432,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
    0.0065428335 = weight(_text_:in in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065428335 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Das Thema "Ethik und Informationsgesellschaft" wird in diesem Sammelband aus folgenden Perspektiven beleuchtet: Privatheit und Datenschutz, Nachhaltigkeit, Human-, Sozial- und Naturverträglichkeit, Interessen- und Wertekonflikte, Urheber- und Menschenrechte.
    BK
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Mit Beiträgen von Dr.-Ing. Peter Brödner, ehem. Institut Arbeit und Technik im Wissenschaftszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen; Dr. Ralf Isenmann, Universität Bremen; Dr. Michael Nagenborg, Karlsruhe; Dr. Raymund Werle, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung; Dr. Martin Woesler, Universität Witten/Herdecke.
  4. Capurro, R.: Informationsethos und Informationsethik : Gedanken zum verantwortungsvollen Handeln im Bereich der Fachinformation (1988) 0.02 
    0.017506894 = product of:
  0.061274126 = sum of:
    0.028074749 = weight(_text_:und in 2462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028074749 = score(doc=2462,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 2462, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2462)
    0.033199377 = weight(_text_:den in 2462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033199377 = score(doc=2462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.25333852 = fieldWeight in 2462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2462)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Der Unterschied zwischen 'Informationsethos', d.h. die herrschende Informationsgewohnheiten einer Gruppe oder Gesellschaft und 'Informationsethik', d.h. die kritische Begründung moralischer Soll-Vorstellungen im Bereich der Fachinformation, bildet den Ausgangspunkt dieser Überlegungen. Ihre Kernthese besagt, daß der Staat eine originäre Verantwortung im Hinblick auf die Demokratisierung des Zugangs zur elektronischen Information hat. Das 'Netz' des öffentlichen Bibliothekswesens könnte hier eine entscheidende Rolle spielen
  5. Ropohl, G.: Ethik und Technikbewertung (1996) 0.02 
    0.015774466 = product of:
  0.055210628 = sum of:
    0.045957662 = weight(_text_:und in 2454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045957662 = score(doc=2454,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 2454, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2454)
    0.009252965 = weight(_text_:in in 2454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009252965 = score(doc=2454,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2454, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2454)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Die Folgen der technischen Entwicklung eröffnen nicht nur Chancen, sondern bergen auch wachsende Risiken in sich. Um die Chancen zu vergrößern und die Risiken zu verringern, werden gegenwärtig 2 verschiedene Konzepte diskutiert: das Konzept der ethischen Techniksteuerung (Berufsethik des Ingenieurs) und das Konzept der politischen Techniksteuerung (Technikfolgen-Abschätzung bzw. Technikbewertung). Beide Konzepte haben spezifische Schwächen. Einerseits wird die Verantwortungsfähigkeit der einzelnen durch zahlreiche theoretische und praktische Schwierigkeiten eingeschränkt, und andererseits verbleibt die politische Technikbewertung außerhalb der technischen Entwicklung und ist dadurch in ihren Einflußmöglichkeiten begrenzt. Es gilt daher, die Idee der Ingenieurethik und die Idee der Technikfolgen-Abschätzung zu einer Synthese konzertierter Techniksteuerung zusammenzuführen
  6. Misselhorn, C.: Grundfragen der Maschinenethik (2019) 0.01 
    0.013520972 = product of:
  0.0473234 = sum of:
    0.039392285 = weight(_text_:und in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039392285 = score(doc=5237,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
    0.007931113 = weight(_text_:in in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007931113 = score(doc=5237,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Maschinen werden immer selbständiger, autonomer, intelligenter. Ihr Vormarsch ist kaum mehr zu stoppen. Dabei geraten sie in Situationen, die moralische Entscheidungen verlangen. Doch können Maschinen überhaupt moralisch handeln, sind sie moralische Akteure - und dürfen sie das? Mit diesen und ähnlichen Fragen beschäftigt sich der völlig neue Ansatz der Maschinenethik. Catrin Misselhorn erläutert die Grundlagen dieser neuen Disziplin an der Schnittstelle von Philosophie, Informatik und Robotik sachkundig und verständlich, etwa am Beispiel von autonomen Waffensystemen, Pflegerobotern und autonomem Fahren: das grundlegende Buch für die neue Disziplin. Intelligente Maschinen, die nicht nur ungeliebte und kräftezehrende Arbeiten verrichten, sondern als Pflegeroboter, Autos und Cyberwaffen in enger Verbindung zum Menschen stehen bis hin zur Kriegsführung benötigen ein Handlungskorsett, eine moralische Richtschnur ihres Handelns.
  7. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.01 
    0.011922316 = product of:
  0.027818736 = sum of:
    0.008773359 = weight(_text_:und in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008773359 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.086576834 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.008094659 = weight(_text_:in in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008094659 = score(doc=2392,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.010950717 = product of:
      0.021901434 = sum of:
        0.021901434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021901434 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16010965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045721713 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.
    Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
  8. Capurro, R.: Ethik im Cyberspace (1997) 0.01 
    0.011712587 = product of:
  0.040994056 = sum of:
    0.029777767 = weight(_text_:und in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029777767 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
    0.011216287 = weight(_text_:in in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011216287 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  9. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01 
    0.010100989 = product of:
  0.03535346 = sum of:
    0.010574817 = weight(_text_:in in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010574817 = score(doc=248,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
    0.024778644 = product of:
      0.049557287 = sum of:
        0.049557287 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049557287 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16010965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045721713 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  10. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.01 
    0.009934278 = product of:
  0.03476997 = sum of:
    0.014020358 = weight(_text_:in in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014020358 = score(doc=421,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
    0.020749612 = weight(_text_:den in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020749612 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This paper develops an ethical conception of library labor as an intellectual craft that can serve as an alternative to a deterministic discourse of technological transformation. In this paper, the author proposes a model of librarianship as an intellectual craft that can be used as an "ideal type" in comparison to recent transformations in the practice of librarianship. This paper then examines the rise of participatory classification in the realm of leisure in user-generated classification schemes (e.g., folksonomies) as a way of examining some of the difficult ethical questions that this ideal of intellectual craft poses when applied to contemporary conditions. Marx's concept of surplus value is used to examine how donated labor adds to the general knowledge. This paper concludes by advocating for the general expansion of leisure coupled with the promotion public institutions that support the craft of those who organize information in a broadly defined public interest. In an era of dramatic change, such a framework offers a positive ethical account of librarians and information professionals' labor that is not wholly dependent on a discourse of market exchange.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_g.pdf.
  11. Pinho, F.A.; Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.: Male homosexuality in Brazilian indexing languages : some ethical questions (2012) 0.01 
    0.0094612595 = product of:
  0.033114407 = sum of:
    0.012364795 = weight(_text_:in in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012364795 = score(doc=417,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
    0.020749612 = weight(_text_:den in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020749612 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Studies on ethics in information organization have deeply contributed to the recognition of the social dimension of Information Science. The subject approach to information is linked to an ethical dimension because one of its major concerns is related to its reliability and usefulness in a specific discursive community or knowledge domain. In this direction, we propose, through an exploratory research design with qualitative and inductive characteristics, to identify the specific terminology that Brazilian indexing languages allow for terms relating to male homosexuality. We also analyzed the terms assigned to papers published in the Journal of Homosexuality, Sexualities and Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health between the years 2005 to 2009. From this analysis of terms and the Brazilian indexing languages, we see (1) the Brazilian context, (2) imprecision in the terminology, (3) indications of prejudices disseminated by political correctness, (4) biased representation of the subject matter, (5) and the presence of figures of speech.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_h.pdf.
  12. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.01 
    0.0094612595 = product of:
  0.033114407 = sum of:
    0.012364795 = weight(_text_:in in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012364795 = score(doc=419,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
    0.020749612 = weight(_text_:den in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020749612 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_d.pdf.
  13. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: Which ethics? Whose morality? : an analysis of ethical standards for information organization (2012) 0.01 
    0.009380184 = product of:
  0.032830644 = sum of:
    0.007931113 = weight(_text_:in in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007931113 = score(doc=424,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
    0.024899531 = weight(_text_:den in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024899531 = score(doc=424,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.19000389 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Ethical standards are required at both the individual and system levels of the information organization enterprise, but are those standards the same? For example, are the ethical responsibilities of DDC's editorial board fundamentally the same as for an individual cataloger? And, what are the consequences of decisions made using different ethical frameworks to the users of knowledge organization systems? A selection of ethical theories suitable for evaluating moral dilemmas at all levels in information organization is presented, including utilitarianism, deontology, and pragmatism, as well as the more contemporary approaches of justice, feminist, and Derridean ethics. Finally, a selection of criteria is outlined, taken from the existing ethical frameworks, to use as a starting point for development of an ethical framework specifically for information organization.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_j.pdf.
  14. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01 
    0.009216048 = product of:
  0.032256167 = sum of:
    0.0074775247 = weight(_text_:in in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074775247 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
    0.024778644 = product of:
      0.049557287 = sum of:
        0.049557287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049557287 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16010965 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045721713 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  15. Keilty, P.: Tagging and sexual boundaries (2012) 0.01 
    0.008914221 = product of:
  0.031199772 = sum of:
    0.010450159 = weight(_text_:in in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010450159 = score(doc=418,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
    0.020749612 = weight(_text_:den in 418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020749612 = score(doc=418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.15833658 = fieldWeight in 418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=418)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate that the mechanisms of power around classifications of gender and sexuality are not always top-down or bottom-up. Instead, the weight of social discipline among members of sexual subcultures themselves helps to create these classifications, often reflecting the nomenclature of subjects and desires within sexual subcultures in a complex relationship to a dominant culture. Critically examining contemporary folksonomic classifications of representations of queer desire within Xtube, a database of online pornography, this paper reveals that social discipline occurs in the stabilization of nomenclature through socialization and through members' overt intervention into each others' selfunderstanding. The Xtube evidence reveals a complex social and cultural structure among members of sexual subcultures by drawing our attention to the particularity of various modes of sexual being and the relationship between those modes and particular configurations of sexual identity. In the process, this paper allows us to reassess, first, a presupposition of folksonomies as free of discipline allowing for their emancipatory potential and, second, the prevailing binary understandings of authority in the development of sexual nomenclatures and classifications as either top-down or bottom-up.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_b.pdf.
  16. Ethics and the librarian : [papers presented at the Allerton Park Institute held October 29-31,1989, Allerton Conference Center, Robert Allerton Park, Monticello, Illinois] (1991) 0.01 
    0.008888069 = product of:
  0.031108238 = sum of:
    0.024565404 = weight(_text_:und in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024565404 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
    0.0065428335 = weight(_text_:in in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065428335 = score(doc=1538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    BK
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    Classification
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) S.45 (T.L. Shoptaugh); Libraries and culture 27(1992) S.219-220 (A.E. Prentice)
  17. Informationsethik (1995) 0.01 
    0.008493326 = product of:
  0.029726638 = sum of:
    0.014888884 = weight(_text_:und in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014888884 = score(doc=2455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
    0.014837754 = weight(_text_:in in 2455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014837754 = score(doc=2455,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 2455, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2455)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge u. Kapitel: HENRICHS, N.: Menschsein im Informationszeitalter; WIEGERLING, K.: Medium und Verhalten; BOUGNOUX, D.: Qui a peur de l'information?; CAPURRO, R.: Moral issues in information science; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethical considerations in technology transfer; DOCTOR, R.D.: Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution; BARBES, R.F.: Ethical and legal issues raised by information technology: the professional producer-product mix; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Ethics, ideologies, and practices of information technology and systems; Du MONT, R.R.: Ethics in librarianship: a management model; HAUPTMANN, R.: Ethical concerns in librarianship: an overview; SWAN, J.: Ethics inside and out: the case of Guidoriccio; SMITH, M.M.: Infoethics for leaders: models of moral agency in the information environment; KOSTREWSKI, B.J. u. C. OPPENHEIM: Ethics in information science; FROHMANN, B.: Knowledge and power in information science: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint 'Ein- u. weiterführende Bibliographie'; 'Ethik-Kodizes'
  18. Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.008170492 = product of:
  0.028596722 = sum of:
    0.012407403 = weight(_text_:und in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012407403 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
    0.016189318 = weight(_text_:in in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016189318 = score(doc=1696,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.260307 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  19. Weber, K.: Ethikcodizes für die Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01 
    0.0077674747 = product of:
  0.02718616 = sum of:
    0.012407403 = weight(_text_:und in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012407403 = score(doc=1699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
    0.0147787575 = weight(_text_:in in 1699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0147787575 = score(doc=1699,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 1699, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1699)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    In the past, many professions and scientific disciplines decided to create a code of ethics which shall guide the professional activities of their members. The rules in these codes of ethics, sometimes called ethical guidelines, shall provide guidance in situations of moral conflict. Obviously, as other professionals or scholars, persons who are involved in knowledge organization face moral conflicts, too. Therefore, ISKO decided to discuss whether it would be necessary to create ethical guidelines for ISKO. In the paper two options to formulate a code of ethics are discussed: First, it is possible to identify moral values without formulating the way they can be achieved - this option is realised in the ethical guidelines of the German Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Second, it is feasible to clearly define morally acceptable professional actions without formulation basic moral values - this option is realised in the ACM and IEEE-CS Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. It is argued that if ISKO should decide to implement an own code of ethics it will be inevitable to choose the second option while it also will be necessary to address the specific needs of knowledge organization and its moral problems, for instance, the conflict of copyright and open access. Additionally, the second option has to be completed by basic moral values that shall underlie the professional actions of knowledge organization.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  20. Information society : new media, ethics and postmodernism (1996) 0.01 
    0.0075690076 = product of:
  0.026491525 = sum of:
    0.009891836 = weight(_text_:in in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009891836 = score(doc=2451,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
    0.016599689 = weight(_text_:den in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016599689 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.12666926 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This volume examines 3 critical debates of the post-industrial society: culture and technology, information society, and postmodernism. It aims to provide theoretical and methodological underpinnings for the analysis and design of information, communication and multimedia technologies. It is a thoroughly interdisciplinara volume, which will be of interest to students, researchers and practitioners in a wide area of disciplines including information and communication systems, education and social sciences
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: COOLEY, M.: Visions and problems of the post-industrial society; GILL, K.S.: Knowledge and the post-industrial society; LYTJE, I.: Media and the cultural condition: language and education; WHISTON, T.: Knowledge and sustainable development: towards the furtherance of a global communication system; SHIPLEY, P.: The keyboard blues: modern technology and the rights and risks of people at work; LEAL, F.: Ethics is fragile, goodness is not; HIROSE, L.M.: Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics; THORPE, J.: Information system design: human centres approaches; BESSELAAR, P. van den u. T. MOM: Technological change, social innovation and employment; JONES, M.: Empowerment and enslavement: business process reeingineering and the transformation of work; LEVY, P.: The role of creativity in post-industrial society: exploring the implications of non-conventional technologies for work and management organisation; JANSEN, A.: The global information society and rural economics; DAY, P.: Information communication technology and society: a community-based approach; CYSNE, F.P.: Technology transfer and development; COOPER, J.: Information, knowledge and empowerment: the role of information in rural development; CLAY, J.: Participative citizenry in the information ages: the role of science and technology towards democratic education in a multicultural society; TAYLOR, J.: New media and cultural representation; BLACK, M.T.: Consensus and authenticity in representations: simulation as participative theatre; GORAYSKA, B. u. J.L. MEY: Cognitive technology; BOYNE, C.W.: Electronic mail, IT productivity and workplace culture; Squires, P.: Deadly technology in the post-industrial society: a case study of firearms and firearms control; COLE, M. u. D. HILL: Resitance postmodernism: emancipatory politics for a new era or academic chic for a defeatist intelligentsia?; McFEE, G.: Postmodernism, dance and post-industrial society; MULLER, R.C.: Creativity constellation for innovation and cooperation

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 38
  • m 2
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 115
  • m 16
  • s 10
  • el 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications