Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Park, J.-r."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Park, J.-r.: Evolution of concept networks and implications for knowledge representation (2007) 0.02
    0.024815073 = product of:
      0.09926029 = sum of:
        0.09926029 = weight(_text_:evolution in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09926029 = score(doc=847,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03697776 = queryNorm
            0.5067985 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present descriptive characteristics of the historical development of concept networks. The linguistic principles, mechanisms and motivations behind the evolution of concept networks are discussed. Implications emanating from the idea of the historical development of concept networks are discussed in relation to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Design/methodology/approach - Natural language data including both speech and text are analyzed by examining discourse contexts in which a linguistic element such as a polysemy or homonym occurs. Linguistic literature on the historical development of concept networks is reviewed and analyzed. Findings - Semantic sense relations in concept networks can be captured in a systematic and regular manner. The mechanism and impetus behind the process of concept network development suggest that semantic senses in concept networks are closely intertwined with pragmatic contexts and discourse structure. The interrelation and permeability of the semantic senses of concept networks are captured on a continuum scale based on three linguistic parameters: concrete shared semantic sense; discourse and text structure; and contextualized pragmatic information. Research limitations/implications - Research findings signify the critical need for linking discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Originality/value - The idea of linguistic characteristics, principles, motivation and mechanisms underlying the evolution of concept networks provides theoretical ground for developing a model for integrating knowledge representation and organization schemes with discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information.
  2. Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007) 0.00
    0.0033399842 = product of:
      0.013359937 = sum of:
        0.013359937 = product of:
          0.04007981 = sum of:
            0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04007981 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.00
    0.002504988 = product of:
      0.010019952 = sum of:
        0.010019952 = product of:
          0.030059857 = sum of:
            0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030059857 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03697776 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24