-
Lin, F.-T.: Drawing a knowledge map of smart city knowledge in academia (2019)
0.02
0.020261422 = product of:
0.08104569 = sum of:
0.08104569 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08104569 = score(doc=5454,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This research takes the academic articles in the Web of Science's core collection database as a corpus to draw a series of knowledge maps, to explore the relationships, connectivity, dis-tribution, and evolution among their keywords with respect to smart cities in the last decade. Beyond just drawing a text cloud or measuring their sizes, we further explore their texture by iden-tifying the hottest keywords in academic articles, construct links between and among them that share common keywords, identify islands, rocks, reefs that are formed by connected articles-a metaphor inspired by Ong et al. (2005)-and analyze trends in their evolution. We found the following phenomena: 1) "Internet of Things" is the most frequently mentioned keyword in recent research articles; 2) the numbers of islands and reefs are increas-ing; 3) the evolutions of the numbers of weighted links have frac-tal-like structure; and, 4) the coverage of the largest rock, formed by articles that share a common keyword, in the largest island is converging into around 10% to 20%. These phenomena imply that a common interest in the technology of smart cities has been emerging among researchers. However, the administrative, social, economic, and cultural issues need more attention in academia in the future.
-
Su, H.-N.: Visualization of global science and technology policy research structure (2012)
0.02
0.017192384 = product of:
0.06876954 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=4969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 4969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4969)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study proposes an approach for visualizing knowledge structures that creates a "research-focused parallelship network," "keyword co-occurrence network," and a knowledge map to visualize Sci-Tech policy research structure. A total of 1,125 Sci-Tech policy-related papers (873 journal papers [78%], 205 conference papers [18%], and 47 review papers [4%]) have been retrieved from the Web of Science database for quantitative analysis and mapping. Different network and contour maps based on these 1,125 papers can be constructed by choosing different information as the main actor, such as the paper title, the institute, the country, or the author keywords, to reflect Sci-Tech policy research structures in micro-, meso-, and macro-levels, respectively. The quantitative way of exploring Sci-Tech policy research papers is investigated to unveil important or emerging Sci-Tech policy implications as well as to demonstrate the dynamics and visualization of the evolution of Sci-Tech policy research.
-
Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, D.; Lu, J.: Scientific evolutionary pathways : identifying and visualizing relationships for scientific topics (2017)
0.01
0.014326988 = product of:
0.05730795 = sum of:
0.05730795 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05730795 = score(doc=3758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 3758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3758)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Whereas traditional science maps emphasize citation statistics and static relationships, this paper presents a term-based method to identify and visualize the evolutionary pathways of scientific topics in a series of time slices. First, we create a data preprocessing model for accurate term cleaning, consolidating, and clustering. Then we construct a simulated data streaming function and introduce a learning process to train a relationship identification function to adapt to changing environments in real time, where relationships of topic evolution, fusion, death, and novelty are identified. The main result of the method is a map of scientific evolutionary pathways. The visual routines provide a way to indicate the interactions among scientific subjects and a version in a series of time slices helps further illustrate such evolutionary pathways in detail. The detailed outline offers sufficient statistical information to delve into scientific topics and routines and then helps address meaningful insights with the assistance of expert knowledge. This empirical study focuses on scientific proposals granted by the United States National Science Foundation, and demonstrates the feasibility and reliability. Our method could be widely applied to a range of science, technology, and innovation policy research, and offer insight into the evolutionary pathways of scientific activities.
-
Representation in scientific practice revisited (2014)
0.01
0.01146159 = product of:
0.04584636 = sum of:
0.04584636 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04584636 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23408018 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Representation in Scientific Practice, published by the MIT Press in 1990, helped coalesce a long-standing interest in scientific visualization among historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science and remains a touchstone for current investigations in science and technology studies. This volume revisits the topic, taking into account both the changing conceptual landscape of STS and the emergence of new imaging technologies in scientific practice. It offers cutting-edge research on a broad array of fields that study information as well as short reflections on the evolution of the field by leading scholars, including some of the contributors to the 1990 volume. The essays consider the ways in which viewing experiences are crafted in the digital era; the embodied nature of work with digital technologies; the constitutive role of materials and technologies -- from chalkboards to brain scans -- in the production of new scientific knowledge; the metaphors and images mobilized by communities of practice; and the status and significance of scientific imagery in professional and popular culture. ContributorsMorana Alac, Michael Barany, Anne Beaulieu, Annamaria Carusi, Catelijne Coopmans, Lorraine Daston, Sarah de Rijcke, Joseph Dumit, Emma Frow, Yann Giraud, Aud Sissel Hoel, Martin Kemp, Bruno Latour, John Law, Michael Lynch, Donald MacKenzie, Cyrus Mody, Natasha Myers, Rachel Prentice, Arie Rip, Martin Ruivenkamp, Lucy Suchman, Janet Vertesi, Steve Woolgar
-
Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016)
0.00
0.0041749803 = product of:
0.016699921 = sum of:
0.016699921 = product of:
0.050099764 = sum of:
0.050099764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050099764 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.00
0.0035425886 = product of:
0.014170354 = sum of:
0.014170354 = product of:
0.04251106 = sum of:
0.04251106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251106 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010)
0.00
0.002504988 = product of:
0.010019952 = sum of:
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:36:46
-
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013)
0.00
0.002504988 = product of:
0.010019952 = sum of:
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4. 2.2015 9:22:39
-
Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016)
0.00
0.0020874902 = product of:
0.008349961 = sum of:
0.008349961 = product of:
0.025049882 = sum of:
0.025049882 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049882 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018)
0.00
0.0020874902 = product of:
0.008349961 = sum of:
0.008349961 = product of:
0.025049882 = sum of:
0.025049882 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049882 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9.12.2018 16:22:25
-
Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018)
0.00
0.0020874902 = product of:
0.008349961 = sum of:
0.008349961 = product of:
0.025049882 = sum of:
0.025049882 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049882 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 17:22:13
-
Batorowska, H.; Kaminska-Czubala, B.: Information retrieval support : visualisation of the information space of a document (2014)
0.00
0.0016699921 = product of:
0.0066799684 = sum of:
0.0066799684 = product of:
0.020039905 = sum of:
0.020039905 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020039905 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016)
0.00
0.001252494 = product of:
0.005009976 = sum of:
0.005009976 = product of:
0.015029929 = sum of:
0.015029929 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015029929 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
