-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.18
0.18370643 = product of:
0.24494192 = sum of:
0.05873049 = product of:
0.17619146 = sum of:
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.16
0.15661463 = product of:
0.31322926 = sum of:
0.078307316 = product of:
0.23492195 = sum of:
0.23492195 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23492195 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.23492195 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23492195 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.14
0.13703781 = product of:
0.27407563 = sum of:
0.06851891 = product of:
0.20555672 = sum of:
0.20555672 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20555672 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.20555672 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20555672 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.12
0.11746098 = product of:
0.23492196 = sum of:
0.05873049 = product of:
0.17619146 = sum of:
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17619146 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17619146 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.10
0.09788415 = product of:
0.1957683 = sum of:
0.048942074 = product of:
0.14682622 = sum of:
0.14682622 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14682622 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14682622 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14682622 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31349787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004)
0.05
0.053637385 = product of:
0.10727477 = sum of:
0.09725482 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09725482 = score(doc=5005,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.49655905 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- After a period of experiment and evolution in the 1950s and 1960s, a fairly standard format for thesauri was established with the publication of the influential Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST) in 1967. This and other early thesauri relied primarily an the presentation of terms in alphabetical order. The value of a classified presentation was subsequently realised, and in particular the technique of facet analysis has profoundly influenced thesaurus evolution. Thesaurofacet and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus have acted as models for two distinct breeds of thesaurus using faceted displays of terms. As of the 1990s, the expansion of end-user access to vast networked resources is imposing further requirements an the style and structure of controlled vocabularies. The international standards for thesauri, first conceived in a print-based era, are badly in need of updating. Work is in hand in the UK and the USA to revise and develop standards in support of electronic thesauri.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:46:13
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.05
0.05252633 = product of:
0.10505266 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.013359937 = product of:
0.04007981 = sum of:
0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04007981 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.05
0.05252633 = product of:
0.10505266 = sum of:
0.09169272 = weight(_text_:evolution in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09169272 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.013359937 = product of:
0.04007981 = sum of:
0.04007981 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04007981 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.05
0.045960538 = product of:
0.091921076 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.011689945 = product of:
0.035069834 = sum of:
0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069834 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.05
0.045960538 = product of:
0.091921076 = sum of:
0.08023113 = weight(_text_:evolution in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023113 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.011689945 = product of:
0.035069834 = sum of:
0.035069834 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069834 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009)
0.04
0.044697825 = product of:
0.08939565 = sum of:
0.08104569 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08104569 = score(doc=2753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.008349961 = product of:
0.025049882 = sum of:
0.025049882 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049882 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:50:30
-
Schmidt, A.; Rößler, O.E.: ¬Die Evolution des Wissens : Plädoyer für das Menschenrecht auf Information (2001)
0.04
0.040115565 = product of:
0.16046226 = sum of:
0.16046226 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16046226 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.8192806 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Coyle, K.: E-Books: it's about evolution, not revolution (2003)
0.04
0.040115565 = product of:
0.16046226 = sum of:
0.16046226 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16046226 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.8192806 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Miller, T.: ¬The German Registry : the evolution of a recordkeeping model (2003)
0.04
0.040115565 = product of:
0.16046226 = sum of:
0.16046226 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16046226 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.8192806 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Liu, Z.: ¬The evolution of documents and its impacts (2004)
0.04
0.039704114 = product of:
0.15881646 = sum of:
0.15881646 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15881646 = score(doc=4430,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.81087756 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article examines the evolution of documents and its impacts from the following aspects: information density, longevity, uniqueness, duplicability, mobility, connectivity, and integration. It focuses on the consequences of the shift from printed media to digital media. By looking back on their evolution, we are able to see how the notions and functions of documents change over time, and the resulting impacts on individuals, organizations, and society.
-
Weiss, A.K.: Proliferating guidelines : a history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources (2003)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Oliveira Lima, J.A. de; Palmirani, M.; Vitali, F.: ¬A time-aware ontology for legal resources (2008)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=2244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=2244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- This paper presents a new approach to associating metadata to legal documents by exploiting a fully developed information ontology of legal resources that takes time into account. Our information ontology is technically an application of the FRBR model to organization of legal documents. Our contribution clarifies not only the diachronic evolution of the legal resources in time, but it also puts the theoretical grounding for the modeling of the relationships between the different entities participating to the legislative process workflow (e.g. bills, amendments). Our model is also applicable to all artefacts of the publishing process. Moreover the time dimension can be used to support successful interconnections between different legal resources (e.g. between normative acts and case-law) that need precise point-in-time referencing.
- Date
- 27.12.2008 9:49:22
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
Satija, M.P.; Singh, J.: Colon Classification (CC) (2009)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=3762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=3762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) has been called the father of the Indian Library movement. He developed the revolutionary Colon Classification (CC), which was published in seven editions from 1928 to 1987. The evolution of the classification through the editions is discussed. The unique features of the CC are described, including the idea, verbal, and notational planes. Tools for designing and evaluating a system are enshrined in his 55 canons, 22 principles, 13 postulates, and 10 devices. Semantic and syntactic relations are enshrined in his PMEST facet formula, fitted with rounds and levels of facets, and other principles, such as the famous wall-picture principle, for citation order of facets. Briefly explained are facet analysis and number building with its notational base of 74 digits. The entry concludes with a discussion of the extent of use of the CC, its enduring contribution to the science of classification, and its future.
-
Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004)
0.04
0.039394744 = product of:
0.07878949 = sum of:
0.06876954 = weight(_text_:evolution in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876954 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19585751 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.010019952 = product of:
0.030059857 = sum of:
0.030059857 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030059857 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12948982 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03697776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 23. 1.2022 10:22:18
