Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"i"
  1. Danesi, D.: Chi ha paura dell'uomo nero? : Maltese e il controllo terminologico (1997) 0.01
    0.011338983 = product of:
      0.04535593 = sum of:
        0.010418912 = weight(_text_:in in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010418912 = score(doc=3749,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
        0.03493702 = weight(_text_:zu in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03493702 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13343859 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.26182097 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Takes issue with the views of Diego Maltese on the control of terms for subject indexing, as promulgated by GRIS, an Italian body developing a guide and thesauri in this area, for Italian subjects
    Content
    Bezug zu: Maltese, D.: Sul controllo dei termini di indicizzazione per soggetti: in: Bolletino AIB 37(1997) no.3, S.334-336.
  2. Valacchi, F.: Things in the World : the integration process of archival descriptions in intercultural systems (2016) 0.01
    0.011246106 = product of:
      0.044984423 = sum of:
        0.01441453 = weight(_text_:in in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01441453 = score(doc=2957,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
        0.030569892 = weight(_text_:zu in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030569892 = score(doc=2957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13343859 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.22909334 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper conjectures that standard archival descriptions are no longer efficient in order to answer to society needs, mainly in an intercultural perspective. After a brief evaluation of the peculiarities of cultural heritage different domain languages, the specific issues of archival descriptions are discussed, seeking the possible strategies - technological as well as cultural - valid to open to an integration of descriptive languages. A particular focus is proposed on RDA, an approach which shows to be the best candidate to harmonize the separate descriptions typical of archival domain and activating the potential informative integrations with any limitation of information environments and single content quality.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu RDA.
  3. Petrucciani, A.: RDA: a critical analysis based on cataloguing theory and practice (2016) 0.01
    0.009639519 = product of:
      0.038558077 = sum of:
        0.012355312 = weight(_text_:in in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012355312 = score(doc=2950,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
        0.026202766 = weight(_text_:zu in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026202766 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13343859 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.19636573 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    RDA appears to be an hybrid standard: a list containing a high number of bibliographic elements and a rewrite - more formal than substantial - of cataloguing practices established with AACR2. In this document, RDA guidelines are analysed trying to compare them to the requirements of good cataloguing rules. Cataloguing rules in general shold not be an abstract and self-referential model but an effective tool to analyse and represent cultural phenomena, useful to qualified staff and helpful in learning about users need. From this point of view, RDA is quite disappointing: many relevant and frequent cataloguing issues are not mentioned at all, and cataloguing itself is left without real guidelines. A certain number of omissions, mistakes and individual flawness in the text should be modified by RDA board with a deep analysis of real cataloguing activities.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu RDA.
  4. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01
    0.008708061 = product of:
      0.034832243 = sum of:
        0.010418912 = weight(_text_:in in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010418912 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.02441333 = product of:
          0.04882666 = sum of:
            0.04882666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04882666 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  5. Aghemo, A.: Anche l'arte ha sue regole : e possibile anche per il bibliotecario del servizio d'informazione fondare la sua attivita su un 'codice' certo? (1993) 0.01
    0.008563602 = product of:
      0.03425441 = sum of:
        0.012892745 = weight(_text_:in in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012892745 = score(doc=3809,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.021361664 = product of:
          0.042723328 = sum of:
            0.042723328 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042723328 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In some areas of librarianship, such as cataloguing and subject classification, there are established rulebooks to guide librarians in their work. Information librarians however have no such aid; their metier is more an art than a profession, since reader queries may concern any aspect of human knowledge. After analysing hundreds of information library reader requests; G. Jahoda and colleagues have sought to formulate self-operating rules for interpreting such queries, utilising the 2 basic elements - what is 'known' and what is 'required' - contained in each request. Lists the categories into which each element breaks down. When presented in matrix form these can indicate the type of reference work to consult to resolve any reader queries
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  6. Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.008131778 = product of:
      0.03252711 = sum of:
        0.011165447 = weight(_text_:in in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011165447 = score(doc=4413,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
        0.021361664 = product of:
          0.042723328 = sum of:
            0.042723328 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042723328 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Library information service assessment studies can help the reference librarian to form an accurate judgement on the library's structure and organization in terms of: efficiency; effectiveness; and cost/benefit ratio. These 3 assessment criteria can be applied to the following areas: staff; users; user requests; answers provided; library information service potential; and collection and documentation resources. Each of these areas yields further sub-categories for evaluation. Data collection methods depend on the end purpose of the assessment study, but may include the issue of questionnaires to librarians and users, and non invasive observation of user activities. The studies can be unpopular, as they may result in cuts in staff or services
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  7. Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.01
    0.008032933 = product of:
      0.03213173 = sum of:
        0.010296092 = weight(_text_:in in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010296092 = score(doc=2958,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
        0.021835638 = weight(_text_:zu in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021835638 = score(doc=2958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13343859 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.16363811 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The report aims to analyze the applicability of the Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the Italian public libraries, and also in the archives and museums in order to contribute to the discussion at international level. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian libraries (ICCU) manages the online catalogue of the Italian libraries and the network of bibliographic services. ICCU has the institutional task of coordinating the cataloging and the documentation activities for the Italian libraries. On March 31 st 2014, the Institute signed the Agreement with the American Library Association,Publishing ALA, for the Italian translation rights of RDA, now available and published inRDAToolkit. The Italian translation has been carried out and realized by the Technical Working Group, made up of the main national and academic libraries, cultural Institutions and bibliographic agencies. The Group started working from the need of studying the new code in its textual detail, to better understand the principles, purposes, and applicability and finally its sustainability within the national context in relation to the area of the bibliographic control. At international level, starting from the publication of the Italian version of RDA and through the research carried out by ICCU and by the national Working Groups, the purpose is a more direct comparison with the experiences of the other European countries, also within EURIG international context, for an exchange of experiences aimed at strengthening the informational content of the data cataloging, with respect to history, cultural traditions and national identities of the different countries.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu RDA.
  8. Galeffi, A.; Sardo, A.L.: Cataloguing, a necessary evil : critical aspects of RDA (2016) 0.01
    0.0074527394 = product of:
      0.029810958 = sum of:
        0.007975319 = weight(_text_:in in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007975319 = score(doc=2952,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
        0.021835638 = weight(_text_:zu in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021835638 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13343859 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.16363811 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9621663 = idf(docFreq=6214, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Toolkit designed by the RDA Steering Committee makes Resource Description and Access available on the web, together with other useful documents (workflows, mappings, etc.). Reading, learning and memorizing are interconnected, and a working tool should make these activities faster and easier to perform. Some issues arise while verifying the real easiness of use and learning of the tool. The practical and formal requirements for a cataloguing code include plain language, ease of memorisation, clarity of instructions, familiarity for users, predictability and reproducibility of solutions, and general usability. From a formal point of view, the RDA text does not appear to be conceived for an uninterrupted reading, but just for reading of few paragraphs for temporary catalographic needs. From a content point of view, having a syndetic view of the description of a resource is rather difficult: catalographic details are scattered and their re-organization is not easy. The visualisation and logical organisation in the Toolkit could be improved: the table of contents occupies a sizable portion of the screen and resizing or hiding it is not easy; the indentation leaves little space to the words; inhomogeneous font styles (italic and bold) and poor contrast between background and text colours make reading not easy; simultaneous visualization of two or more parts of the text is not allowed; and Toolkit's icons are less intuitive than expected. In the conclusion, some suggestions on how to improve the Toolkit's aspects and usability are provided.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu RDA.
  9. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.01
    0.006952009 = product of:
      0.027808037 = sum of:
        0.0064463727 = weight(_text_:in in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064463727 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.021361664 = product of:
          0.042723328 = sum of:
            0.042723328 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042723328 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06
  10. Atti del sminario di studi sulla CDU. Roma, 22. settembre 1975. A cura di Maria Pia Carosella (1977) 0.01
    0.005340416 = product of:
      0.042723328 = sum of:
        0.042723328 = product of:
          0.085446656 = sum of:
            0.085446656 = weight(_text_:22 in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085446656 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  11. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00
    0.002670208 = product of:
      0.021361664 = sum of:
        0.021361664 = product of:
          0.042723328 = sum of:
            0.042723328 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042723328 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15774915 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045047637 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  12. Cheti, A.: L'indicizzazione per soggetto negli anni Novanta (1996) 0.00
    0.0020592185 = product of:
      0.016473748 = sum of:
        0.016473748 = weight(_text_:in in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016473748 = score(doc=7239,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the development in subject heading systems in Europe and America in recent years. Presents these developments in terms of the indexing languages used, the methods of subject analysis used, and the instruments comprised by the different systems (e.g. the rules governing the control of vocabulary and the construction of strings). Discusses the principles underlying the systems
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Subject headings in the 90s
  13. Cappelini, V.: ¬La telematica e i beni culturali (1995) 0.00
    0.0018418209 = product of:
      0.014734567 = sum of:
        0.014734567 = weight(_text_:in in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014734567 = score(doc=4393,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The head of electronic engineering at Florence's Universita degli Studi describes how the department has used digitized imaging and computer reconstructions to aid the restoration and preservation of works of art in museums such as the Uffizi. The dapertmant shares in the MAN (Metropolitan Area Network) Toscana Telecoms project, whose applications include remote access to libraries and museums; and it also takes part in the EU MUSA project, which developed the Vasari (Visual Arts Systems Archiving Retrieval Images) scanner, and in the RAMA (Remote Access to Museum Archives) scheme
  14. Diella, L.: Formare al reference in una biblioteca di facolta (1998) 0.00
    0.0018418209 = product of:
      0.014734567 = sum of:
        0.014734567 = weight(_text_:in in 3878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014734567 = score(doc=3878,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3878, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3878)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how the small-scale public information service at Milan's Universita degli Studi Political Sciences library coped with the emergency caused by the sudden resignation of its reference librarian by drafting in on a part-time replacement basis existing library staff without previous reference desk experience. Outlines their intensive training in the information technology needed to enable them to provide the differing materials and services required by 3 classes of reader: undergraduates, graduates and postgraduates
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Reference desk training in an academic library
  15. Lunati, G.: On line union catalogue (OLUC) compie 25 anni (1996) 0.00
    0.0018018163 = product of:
      0.01441453 = sum of:
        0.01441453 = weight(_text_:in in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01441453 = score(doc=105,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins and development to date of OLUC, the worldwide bibliographic database of OCLC launched by Ohio College in 1971. OLUC now has over 34m records, with publications in 400 languages. Aftere arly criticism of database accuracy, OCLC began quality improvement programmes in the 1990s, introducing the TechPro 'turnkey cataloguing' and Prompt-Cat acquisitions services. Explains how OLUC solved the 3 problems of duplicated records, sparse bibliographic data, and too many author and subject headings. OCLC has invested heavily in improving data quality, launching an authority control service in early 1996. Provides details of several cooperation programmes started by OCLC, e.g. Conser, USNP, NACO, Enhance and others
  16. Traniello, P.: ¬La Biblioteca nell'Encyclopedie tra sinstesi riepilogativa e spunti critici (1997) 0.00
    0.0018018163 = product of:
      0.01441453 = sum of:
        0.01441453 = weight(_text_:in in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01441453 = score(doc=5435,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses 5 articles on subjects of bibliographic interest in the 1st ed. (1751-80) of Encyclopedie, now re-issued in facsimile form. The article headings (translated) are Bibliomane, Bibliomania, Librarian, Library, and Catalogue. The relevant authors include Diderot, d'Alembert and David, among others. By identifying likely sources, the analysis throws light on library science developments in the early 18th century. D'Alembert's contribution, in particular, contains the seeds of the modern view of what libraries ought not to be
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A brief review of articles relating to library topics in Diderot's Encyclopedie, with critical comments
  17. Badalamenti, G.: ¬L'¬introduzione del GRIS in un sistema multibiblioteche : realta e problemi aperti (1997) 0.00
    0.0016918206 = product of:
      0.0135345645 = sum of:
        0.0135345645 = weight(_text_:in in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0135345645 = score(doc=1167,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The GRIS subject heading scheme is the outcome of a collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Describes the efforts to introduce the scheme to a number of libraries in the Siena Library Service in Italy in the last 3 years. Notes the phases of this project, pricipally a series of trainign seminars and a year of experimentation, before agreement by most of the libraries to implement the scheme. Describes the main features of the electronic subject heading files as they now exist, as they cope with pre existing schemes and the new scheme. Provides statistical sata on these files and outlines the problems which remain to be solved in thre implementation of the scheme
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The introduction of the GRIS subject heading scheme in a multi library system: reality and continuing problems
  18. Cheti, A.; Crocetti, A.; Danesi, D.: Espansione o elencazione? : Ovvero l'equivoco ingombro (1995) 0.00
    0.0016115932 = product of:
      0.012892745 = sum of:
        0.012892745 = weight(_text_:in in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012892745 = score(doc=4463,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a rebuttal of criticisms of the Italian version of Dewey's 20th ed., which in the section relating to the geography of Italy was alleged to have expanded and updated Auxiliary Table 2 by using classification methods that resulted in errors in the location of some of the country's 8.000 communes (Bibliotecario 38(1993), 147-148). The debate focuses on aspects such as the numbering system of classification, the use of subdivisions, whether or not to list all communes,and the absence in Italy of an intermediate entity between province and commune
  19. Bolzoni, D.; Santoro, M.: Percorsi bibliografici (1996) 0.00
    0.0016115932 = product of:
      0.012892745 = sum of:
        0.012892745 = weight(_text_:in in 5737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012892745 = score(doc=5737,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5737, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5737)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a proposed system for helping public library users, in praticular students, in their document searches. The system would directly involve users in compiling cards that indictae the various library sources (encyclopedias, books, newspapers, magazines, etc.) from which they retrieved bibliographic data. These cards would then be used to create a search path catalogue having 2 sections: general research topics; and keywords. Subsequently the librarian would form a database from this information. Such a system would not only benefit other researchers but also help the library to plan acquisition and rationalise its document arrangements. The scheme won 3rd prize in an open competition designated 'La biblioteca desiderata' (The kind of library we want), promoted jointly by the Milan Province Cultural Office and Biblioteche Oggi
  20. Cook, M.: ¬The International Description Standards : new departures (1996) 0.00
    0.0016115932 = product of:
      0.012892745 = sum of:
        0.012892745 = weight(_text_:in in 7872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012892745 = score(doc=7872,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061276253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045047637 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7872, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7872)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Authority controls can be used somewhat differently in archive management from the way they are used in bibliographic management. This difference is formalised in the 1994 draft International Standard Archival Authority Rules for Coporate Bodies, Persons and Families, or ISAAR(CPF), now available to the archival profession for examining andtesting. Identifies 2 distict purposes for authority control in archives work: to establish a standard form for the heading of an authority record; and to provide a structure for separating contextual (provenance) descriptions from content descriptions. Illustrates how ISAAR(CPF) seeks to fulfil both these purposes, providing an example of family authority entry

Years

Types

  • a 63
  • el 7
  • s 2
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…