Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.09 
    0.08711748 = product of:
  0.17423496 = sum of:
    0.16167651 = product of:
      0.32335302 = sum of:
        0.32335302 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32335302 = score(doc=1484,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            1.3559462 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012558444 = product of:
      0.037675332 = sum of:
        0.037675332 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037675332 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Dieses Whitepaper beschäftigt sich mit der Definition und Bewertung von Faktoren, die eine hohe Rangkorrelation-Koeffizienz mit organischen Suchergebnissen aufweisen und dient dem Zweck der tieferen Analyse von Suchmaschinen-Algorithmen. Die Datenerhebung samt Auswertung bezieht sich auf Ranking-Faktoren für Google-Deutschland im Jahr 2014. Zusätzlich wurden die Korrelationen und Faktoren unter anderem anhand von Durchschnitts- und Medianwerten sowie Entwicklungstendenzen zu den Vorjahren hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz für vordere Suchergebnis-Positionen interpretiert.
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
    Source
    http://www.searchmetrics.com/media/documents/knowledge-base/searchmetrics-ranking-faktoren-studie-2014.pdf
  2. Walz, J.: Analyse der Übertragbarkeit allgemeiner Rankingfaktoren von Web-Suchmaschinen auf Discovery-Systeme (2018) 0.02 
    0.023481393 = product of:
  0.09392557 = sum of:
    0.09392557 = product of:
      0.18785115 = sum of:
        0.18785115 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18785115 = score(doc=5744,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.78773355 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ziel: Ziel dieser Bachelorarbeit war es, die Übertragbarkeit der allgemeinen Rankingfaktoren, wie sie von Web-Suchmaschinen verwendet werden, auf Discovery-Systeme zu analysieren. Dadurch könnte das bisher hauptsächlich auf dem textuellen Abgleich zwischen Suchanfrage und Dokumenten basierende bibliothekarische Ranking verbessert werden. Methode: Hierfür wurden Faktoren aus den Gruppen Popularität, Aktualität, Lokalität, Technische Faktoren, sowie dem personalisierten Ranking diskutiert. Die entsprechenden Rankingfaktoren wurden nach ihrer Vorkommenshäufigkeit in der analysierten Literatur und der daraus abgeleiteten Wichtigkeit, ausgewählt. Ergebnis: Von den 23 untersuchten Rankingfaktoren sind 14 (61 %) direkt vom Ranking der Web-Suchmaschinen auf das Ranking der Discovery-Systeme übertragbar. Zu diesen zählen unter anderem das Klickverhalten, das Erstellungsdatum, der Nutzerstandort, sowie die Sprache. Sechs (26%) der untersuchten Faktoren sind dagegen nicht übertragbar (z.B. Aktualisierungsfrequenz und Ladegeschwindigkeit). Die Linktopologie, die Nutzungshäufigkeit, sowie die Aktualisierungsfrequenz sind mit entsprechenden Modifikationen übertragbar.
  3. Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015) 0.02 
    0.018075984 = product of:
  0.072303936 = sum of:
    0.072303936 = product of:
      0.14460787 = sum of:
        0.14460787 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14460787 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.60639757 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Das von der DFG geförderte Projekt LibRank erforscht neue Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme, die aufbauend auf Erkenntnissen aus dem Bereich Websuche qualitätsinduzierende Faktoren wie z. B. Aktualität, Popularität und Verfügbarkeit von einzelnen Medien berücksichtigen. Die konzipierten Verfahren werden im Kontext eines in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften häufig genutzten Rechercheportals (EconBiz) entwickelt und in einem Testsystem systematisch evaluiert. Es werden Rankingfaktoren, die für den Bibliotheksbereich von besonderem Interesse sind, vorgestellt und exemplarisch Probleme und Herausforderungen aufgezeigt.
  4. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.02 
    0.015816486 = product of:
  0.06326594 = sum of:
    0.06326594 = product of:
      0.12653188 = sum of:
        0.12653188 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12653188 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2384704 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.53059787 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme. Dazu wurden mögliche Faktoren für das Relevanzranking ausgehend von den Verfahren in Websuchmaschinen identifiziert, auf den Bibliothekskontext übertragen und systematisch evaluiert. Mithilfe eines Testsystems, das auf dem ZBW-Informationsportal EconBiz und einer web-basierten Software zur Evaluierung von Suchsystemen aufsetzt, wurden verschiedene Relevanzfaktoren (z. B. Popularität in Verbindung mit Aktualität) getestet. Obwohl die getesteten Rankingverfahren auf einer theoretischen Ebene divers sind, konnten keine einheitlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber den Baseline-Rankings gemessen werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Adaptierung des Rankings auf individuelle Nutzer bzw. Nutzungskontexte notwendig sein könnte, um eine höhere Performance zu erzielen.
  5. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.01 
    0.008400721 = product of:
  0.033602882 = sum of:
    0.033602882 = product of:
      0.067205764 = sum of:
        0.067205764 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067205764 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  6. Crestani, F.: Combination of similarity measures for effective spoken document retrieval (2003) 0.01 
    0.008316289 = product of:
  0.033265155 = sum of:
    0.033265155 = product of:
      0.06653031 = sum of:
        0.06653031 = weight(_text_:29 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06653031 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.87-96
  7. Okada, M.; Ando, K.; Lee, S.S.; Hayashi, Y.; Aoe, J.I.: ¬An efficient substring search method by using delayed keyword extraction (2001) 0.01 
    0.007128248 = product of:
  0.028512992 = sum of:
    0.028512992 = product of:
      0.057025984 = sum of:
        0.057025984 = weight(_text_:29 in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057025984 = score(doc=6415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2002 17:24:03
  8. Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part II: uncertainty expansion in a prototype of a diagnostic IR tool (1998) 0.01 
    0.007128248 = product of:
  0.028512992 = sum of:
    0.028512992 = product of:
      0.057025984 = sum of:
        0.057025984 = weight(_text_:29 in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057025984 = score(doc=6432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 14:48:29
  9. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.01 
    0.006279222 = product of:
  0.025116889 = sum of:
    0.025116889 = product of:
      0.075350665 = sum of:
        0.075350665 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075350665 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  10. Zhang, W.; Korf, R.E.: Performance of linear-space search algorithms (1995) 0.01 
    0.005940207 = product of:
  0.023760827 = sum of:
    0.023760827 = product of:
      0.047521655 = sum of:
        0.047521655 = weight(_text_:29 in 4744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047521655 = score(doc=4744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 8.1996 10:29:15
  11. Hüther, H.: Selix im DFG-Projekt Kascade (1998) 0.01 
    0.005940207 = product of:
  0.023760827 = sum of:
    0.023760827 = product of:
      0.047521655 = sum of:
        0.047521655 = weight(_text_:29 in 5151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047521655 = score(doc=5151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    25. 8.2000 19:55:29
  12. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01 
    0.00549432 = product of:
  0.02197728 = sum of:
    0.02197728 = product of:
      0.065931834 = sum of:
        0.065931834 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065931834 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  13. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01 
    0.00549432 = product of:
  0.02197728 = sum of:
    0.02197728 = product of:
      0.065931834 = sum of:
        0.065931834 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065931834 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  14. Uratani, N.; Takeda, M.: ¬A fast string-searching algorithm for multiple patterns (1993) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 6275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=6275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.775-791
  15. Chakrabarti, S.; Dom, B.; Kumar, S.R.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Tomkins, A.; Kleinberg, J.M.; Gibson, D.: Neue Pfade durch den Internet-Dschungel : Die zweite Generation von Web-Suchmaschinen (1999) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  16. Thompson, P.: Looking back: on relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 19:58:29
  17. Vechtomova, O.; Karamuftuoglu, M.: Lexical cohesion and term proximity in document ranking (2008) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:29:05
  18. Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013) 0.00 
    0.004752165 = product of:
  0.01900866 = sum of:
    0.01900866 = product of:
      0.03801732 = sum of:
        0.03801732 = weight(_text_:29 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801732 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12227264 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 6.2013 18:06:23
  19. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.00 
    0.0047094165 = product of:
  0.018837666 = sum of:
    0.018837666 = product of:
      0.056512997 = sum of:
        0.056512997 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056512997 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  20. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.00 
    0.0047094165 = product of:
  0.018837666 = sum of:
    0.018837666 = product of:
      0.056512997 = sum of:
        0.056512997 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056512997 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12172144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034759384 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 14
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 60
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications