Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"08.38 Ethik"
  • × classification_ss:"54.72 Künstliche Intelligenz"
  1. Misselhorn, C.: Grundfragen der Maschinenethik (2019) 0.02
    0.015061131 = product of:
      0.04518339 = sum of:
        0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075724614 = score(doc=5237,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
        0.03761093 = weight(_text_:und in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03761093 = score(doc=5237,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Maschinen werden immer selbständiger, autonomer, intelligenter. Ihr Vormarsch ist kaum mehr zu stoppen. Dabei geraten sie in Situationen, die moralische Entscheidungen verlangen. Doch können Maschinen überhaupt moralisch handeln, sind sie moralische Akteure - und dürfen sie das? Mit diesen und ähnlichen Fragen beschäftigt sich der völlig neue Ansatz der Maschinenethik. Catrin Misselhorn erläutert die Grundlagen dieser neuen Disziplin an der Schnittstelle von Philosophie, Informatik und Robotik sachkundig und verständlich, etwa am Beispiel von autonomen Waffensystemen, Pflegerobotern und autonomem Fahren: das grundlegende Buch für die neue Disziplin. Intelligente Maschinen, die nicht nur ungeliebte und kräftezehrende Arbeiten verrichten, sondern als Pflegeroboter, Autos und Cyberwaffen in enger Verbindung zum Menschen stehen bis hin zur Kriegsführung benötigen ein Handlungskorsett, eine moralische Richtschnur ihres Handelns.
  2. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.00
    0.0016629322 = product of:
      0.009977593 = sum of:
        0.009977593 = weight(_text_:in in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009977593 = score(doc=671,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 73(2022) no.10, S.1506-1509 (Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo).