Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Linguistik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Bies, W.: Linguistische Pragmatik : eine vernachlässigte Referenzdisziplin der Inhaltserschließung (1992) 0.02 
    0.018233158 = product of:
  0.054699473 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=22,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
    0.043879416 = weight(_text_:und in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043879416 = score(doc=22,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die Pragmalinguistik, eine bislang vernachlässigte Referenzdisziplin der bibliothekarischen Inhaltserschließung, stellt ein reiches Reservoir an Erkenntnissen, Konzepten und Methoden bereit, um die 'pragmatische Wende', vor allem die benutzerorientierung, in der Inhaltserschließung zu fördern, um den Prozeß der Inhaltsanalyse aufzuwerten, um eine Neubewertung von Konzepten wie Aspekt und Facette zu ermöglichen und um die semantischen und lexikalischen Gesetzmäßigkeiten des Schlagwortkatalogs neu zu bestimmen und, neu definiert, in eine (noch zu erbringende) Theorie des Schlagwortkatalogs einzubringen. Überdies kann die Pragmalinguistik wertvolle Hilfestellung bei der Evaluierung und Optimierung der Inhaltserschließung für den OPAC leisten
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.2
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  2. Glasersfeld, E. von: ¬Die semantische Analyse von Verben auf der Grundlage begrifflicher Situationen (1987) 0.02 
    0.015375748 = product of:
  0.046127245 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=37,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=37,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Original: 'Semantic analysis of verbs in terms of conceptual situations' in: Linguistics 94(1972) S.90-107
    Series
    Wissenschaftstheorie - Wissenschaft und Philosophie; 24
    Source
    Glasersfeld, E. von: Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit: Arbeiten zum radikalen Konstruktivismus. Autorisierte deutsche Fassung von W.K. Köck
  3. Krömmelbein, U.: Linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte der Schlagwortsyntax : Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, der RSWK und der Indexierungsverfahren Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS (1984) 0.02 
    0.015187439 = product of:
  0.045562316 = sum of:
    0.005354538 = weight(_text_:in in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005354538 = score(doc=984,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
    0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040207777 = score(doc=984,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt bietet seit einigen Jahren zentrale Dienste im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung an, Um deren Akzeptanz zu verbessern, will die Deutsche Bibliothek ab 1986 von der augenblicklichen gleichordnenden Indexierung zu einem syntaktischen Verfahren übergehen. Als Alternativen standen die RSWK und eine verkürzte Version des britischen Indexierungsverfahrens PRECIS zur Diskussion. Die Anforderungen einer Fachwissenschaft an die Schlagwort-Syntax einer adäquaten Dokumentationssprache werden exemplarisch entwickelt, die vier Alternativen - augenblickliche verbale Sacherschließunf der DB, RSWK, PRECIS (britische Version) und Kurz-PRECIS (DB-Version) - an ihnen gemessen. Die Kriterien basiern auf Grammatiktheorien der modernen Linguistik und gehen von einer Analogie zwischen Dokumentationssprachen und natürlicher Sprache aus.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 8(1984), S.159-202
  4. Fillmore, C.J.: ¬The case for case (1968) 0.01 
    0.012104477 = product of:
  0.03631343 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
    0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02369266 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Deutsche Übersetzung ('Plädoyer für Kasus') in: Kasustheorie. Hrsg. von W. Abraham. Frankfurt: Athenäum 1971 (Schwerpunkte Linguistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft; Bd.2) S.1-118.
    Source
    Universals in language. Ed.: E. Bach u. R.T. Harms
  5. O'Donnell, R.; Smeaton, A.F.: ¬A linguistic approach to information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.008438686 = product of:
  0.025316058 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=2575,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    An important aspect of information retrieval systems is domain independence, where the subject of the information is not restricted to certain domains of knowledge. This should be able to represent any topic and although the text representation does not involve any semantic knowledge, lexical and syntactic analysis of the text allows the representation to remain domain independent. Reports research at Dublin City University, Ireland, which concentrates on the lexical and syntactic levels of natural language analysis and describes a domain independent automatic information retrieval system which accesses a very large database of newspaper text from the Wall Street Journal. The system represents the text in the form of syntax trees, and these trees are used in the matching process. Reports early results from the stuyd
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Warner, A.J.: Quantitative and qualitative assessments of the impact of linguistic theory on information science (1991) 0.01 
    0.006900288 = product of:
  0.04140173 = sum of:
    0.04140173 = product of:
      0.08280346 = sum of:
        0.08280346 = weight(_text_:22 in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08280346 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:45
  7. Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980) 0.01 
    0.005528287 = product of:
  0.03316972 = sum of:
    0.03316972 = weight(_text_:und in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03316972 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: eine Einführung. 2. Aufl
  8. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00 
    0.003450144 = product of:
  0.020700864 = sum of:
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  9. Rasmussen, L.: Selected linguistic problems in indexing within the Canadian context (1992) 0.00 
    0.0025762038 = product of:
  0.015457222 = sum of:
    0.015457222 = weight(_text_:in in 1609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015457222 = score(doc=1609,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.260307 = fieldWeight in 1609, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1609)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Takes into account the linguistic characteristics of Canadian English and of Canadian French as well as the problem involved in bilingual indexing because of the trend in the English language towards nominalization
  10. Hutchins, W.J.: Linguistic processes in the indexing and retrieval of documents (1970) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Dahl, V.: What the study of language can contribute to AI (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 5098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=5098,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5098, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5098)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Examines areas in which linguistics in particular and the study of language in general have provided useful insight into specific artificial intelligence areas besides the computational linguistics one. Discusses studies in these areas and argues that these links should be further and more deliberately explored since they have changes of leading the way towards a fruitful integration between the formal and humanistic sciences
  12. Chomsky, N.: Logical structure in language (1957) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  13. Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993) 0.00 
    0.0021034614 = product of:
  0.012620768 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=2290,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.538-552.
  14. Harras, G.: Concepts in linguistics : concepts in natural language (2000) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=5068,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper deals with different views of lexical semantics. The focus is on the relationship between lexical expressions and conceptual components. First the assumptions about lexicalization and decompositionality of concepts shared by the most semanticists are presented, followed by a discussion of the differences between two-level-semants and one-level-semantics. The final part is concentrated on the interpretation of conceptual components in situations of communication
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
  15. Suominen, V.: Linguistic / semiotic conditions of information retrieval / documentation in the light of a sausurean conception of language : 'organising knowledge' or 'communication concerning documents'? (1998) 0.00 
    0.0019955188 = product of:
  0.011973113 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=81,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Argumentation consists of representation of the basic structuralist concepts of language/semiotic as a two-level form, as a form of expression and here especially form of content, and of application of these concepts to the phenomena of the representation of the contents of documents. On the basis of argumentation the paper questions the notion of "organizing knowledge", is it, or in what sense it is possible to organize knowledge. The paper bings out some reservations to viewing content representation as organizing knowledge in a strong sense and suggests that instead could be used a notion of (meta)documentation, characterized as communication concerning documents
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  16. Molina, M.P.: Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written documentary content analysis (WTDCA) (1994) 0.00 
    0.0018033426 = product of:
  0.010820055 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 6147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=6147,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6147, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6147)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Content analysis, restricted within the limits of written textual documents (WTDCA), is a field which is greatly in need of extensive interdisciplinary research. This would clarify certain concepts, especially those concerned with 'text', as a new central nucleus of semiotic research, and 'content', or the informative power of text. The objective reality (syntax) of the written document should be, in the cognitve process that all content analysis entails, interpreted (semantically and pragmatically) in an intersubjective manner with regard to the context, the analyst's knowledge base and the documentary objectives. The contributions of sociolinguistics (textual), logic (formal) and psychology (cognitive) are fundamental to the conduct of these activities. The criteria used to validate the results obtained complete the necessary conceptual reference panorama
  17. Pandey, R.C.: Information retrieval systems : a linguistic approach (1997) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=133,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Describes correspondence between linguistics and information retrieval. Notes relevant ideas of linguistics which are useful for information retrieval, particularly at the levels of semantics and syntax. Demonstrates that the conceptual model of Ranganathan based on canons, postulates and pronciples contains the principles expressed by other scholars in the field of information retrieval. Implements Ranganathan's conceptual models in information retrieval tools, using PRECIS as an example. Concludes the Ranganathan models contain all the germinal ideas to meet the challenges of modern technology
  18. Crystal, D.: Linguistics and indexing (1984) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In recent years, linguistics has developed a way of looking at language which may offer some insights to the indexer. Three main stages of inquiry are identified: observational, intuitional and evaluative. It is suggested that evaluative discussion of indexes is dependent on prior research at the observational and intuitional stages
  19. Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997) 0.00 
    0.0012620769 = product of:
  0.0075724614 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=2576,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Argues that the integration of computational psycholinguistics can improve corporate communication, and thus become a new strategic tool. An electronic dictionary was created of basic, neutral and negative connotations for nouns, verbs and adjectives appearing in press releases and other communication media, which can be updated with client specific words. The focus on negative messages has the objective of detecting who, why and how publics are criticized, to learn from the vocabulary of opinion leaders and to improve issues management proactively. Suggests a new form of analysis called 'computational linguistic context analysis' (CLCA) by analyzing nominal groups of negative words, rather than monitoring content analysis in the traditional way. Concludes that CLCA can be used to analyze large quantities of press cuttings about a company and could, theoretically, be used to analyze the structure, language and style of a particular journalist to whom it is planned to send a press release or article

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 15
  • d 4

Themes