-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.05
0.04655378 = product of:
0.07758963 = sum of:
0.019449355 = weight(_text_:information in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019449355 = score(doc=3494,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035798695 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.022341577 = product of:
0.044683155 = sum of:
0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044683155 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.03
0.027593777 = product of:
0.06898444 = sum of:
0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030684596 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.038299847 = product of:
0.076599695 = sum of:
0.076599695 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076599695 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.03
0.027593777 = product of:
0.06898444 = sum of:
0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030684596 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.038299847 = product of:
0.076599695 = sum of:
0.076599695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076599695 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.03
0.026578411 = product of:
0.06644603 = sum of:
0.040912796 = weight(_text_:und in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040912796 = score(doc=4339,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Series
- Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 53
-
Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023)
0.03
0.02529502 = product of:
0.06323755 = sum of:
0.015880331 = weight(_text_:information in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880331 = score(doc=783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
0.04735722 = weight(_text_:und in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04735722 = score(doc=783,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag nimmt eine informationswissenschaftliche Perspektive ein und betrachtet das Phänomen der Klassifikation als Methode und System der Wissensorganisation. Ein Klassifikationssystem wird dabei als Wissensorganisationssystem (engl. knowledge organization system) verstanden, das vor allem im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation zum Einsatz kommt, um dokumentarische Bezugseinheiten (DBE) mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular zu beschreiben (s. Kapitel B 1 Einführung Wissensorganisation). Als eine solche Dokumentationssprache zeichnet sich ein Klassifikationssystem typischerweise durch seine systematische Ordnung aus und dient der inhaltlichen Groberschließung, eignet sich aber auch als Aufstellungssystematik und Hilfsmittel bei der Recherche wie etwa als systematischer Sucheinstieg oder thematischer Filter für Treffermengen. Beim Information Retrieval liegt die Stärke der klassifikatorischen Erschließung durch das hohe Abstraktionsniveau in Überblicks- und Vollständigkeitsrecherchen.
- Source
- Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.02
0.019973785 = product of:
0.04993446 = sum of:
0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019249868 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030684596 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979)
0.02
0.016074141 = product of:
0.04018535 = sum of:
0.0136117125 = weight(_text_:information in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0136117125 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.02657364 = weight(_text_:und in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02657364 = score(doc=1427,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.02
0.015346591 = product of:
0.038366478 = sum of:
0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012833246 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.025533231 = product of:
0.051066462 = sum of:
0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051066462 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.01
0.014328319 = product of:
0.035820797 = sum of:
0.016670875 = weight(_text_:information in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016670875 = score(doc=2945,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.019149924 = product of:
0.038299847 = sum of:
0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038299847 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.012799931 = product of:
0.031999826 = sum of:
0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016041556 = score(doc=3483,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.01595827 = product of:
0.03191654 = sum of:
0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03191654 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014)
0.01
0.012799931 = product of:
0.031999826 = sum of:
0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016041556 = score(doc=1778,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.01595827 = product of:
0.03191654 = sum of:
0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03191654 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
- Date
- 8. 4.2015 16:22:13
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.011897362 = product of:
0.029743403 = sum of:
0.016976789 = weight(_text_:information in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016976789 = score(doc=2346,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.0127666155 = product of:
0.025533231 = sum of:
0.025533231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025533231 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Bowker, G.C.; Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999)
0.01
0.011812349 = product of:
0.029530872 = sum of:
0.009074475 = weight(_text_:information in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009074475 = score(doc=733,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.020456398 = weight(_text_:und in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020456398 = score(doc=733,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Is this book sociology, anthropology, or taxonomy? Sorting Things Out, by communications theorists Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, covers a lot of conceptual ground in its effort to sort out exactly how and why we classify and categorize the things and concepts we encounter day to day. But the analysis doesn't stop there; the authors go on to explore what happens to our thinking as a result of our classifications. With great insight and precise academic language, they pick apart our information systems and language structures that lie deeper than the everyday categories we use. The authors focus first on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), a widely used scheme used by health professionals worldwide, but also look at other health information systems, racial classifications used by South Africa during apartheid, and more. Though it comes off as a bit too academic at times (by the end of the 20th century, most writers should be able to get the spelling of McDonald's restaurant right), the book has a clever charm that thoughtful readers will surely appreciate. A sly sense of humor sneaks into the writing, giving rise to the chapter title "The Kindness of Strangers," for example. After arguing that categorization is both strongly influenced by and a powerful reinforcer of ideology, it follows that revolutions (political or scientific) must change the way things are sorted in order to throw over the old system. Who knew that such simple, basic elements of thought could have such far-reaching consequences? Whether you ultimately place it with social science, linguistics, or (as the authors fear) fantasy, make sure you put Sorting Things Out in your reading pile.
- BK
- 02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
- Classification
- AN 93400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Klassifikation
02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
- RVK
- AN 93400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Klassifikation
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.011509943 = product of:
0.028774858 = sum of:
0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009624934 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.019149924 = product of:
0.038299847 = sum of:
0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038299847 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.01
0.011509943 = product of:
0.028774858 = sum of:
0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009624934 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.019149924 = product of:
0.038299847 = sum of:
0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038299847 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.01
0.010920546 = product of:
0.027301364 = sum of:
0.011343094 = weight(_text_:information in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011343094 = score(doc=5562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.01595827 = product of:
0.03191654 = sum of:
0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03191654 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969)
0.01
0.010824508 = product of:
0.054122537 = sum of:
0.054122537 = weight(_text_:und in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054122537 = score(doc=2020,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979)
0.01
0.010629456 = product of:
0.05314728 = sum of:
0.05314728 = weight(_text_:und in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05314728 = score(doc=1423,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
DIN 32705: Klassifikationssysteme: Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen (1987)
0.01
0.010629456 = product of:
0.05314728 = sum of:
0.05314728 = weight(_text_:und in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05314728 = score(doc=1653,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Vgl. zur Einführung in die Norm auch die Beiträge von W. Gödert: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme ... in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 11(1987) und I. Dahlberg: DIN 32705: ... in: International classification 19(1992)
-
DIN 2331: Begriffssysteme und ihre Darstellung (1980)
0.01
0.010228199 = product of:
0.051140994 = sum of:
0.051140994 = weight(_text_:und in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051140994 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.047114085 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
