Search (92 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.06
    0.056906953 = product of:
      0.11381391 = sum of:
        0.11381391 = sum of:
          0.07933304 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07933304 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.29343233 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03448087 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence ; 4604
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
  2. Bringsjord, S.; Clark, M.; Taylor, J.: Sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning requires philosophy (2014) 0.06
    0.056906953 = product of:
      0.11381391 = sum of:
        0.11381391 = sum of:
          0.07933304 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07933304 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.29343233 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03448087 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What is knowledge representation and reasoning (KR&R)? Alas, a thorough account would require a book, or at least a dedicated, full-length paper, but here we shall have to make do with something simpler. Since most readers are likely to have an intuitive grasp of the essence of KR&R, our simple account should suffice. The interesting thing is that this simple account itself makes reference to some of the foundational distinctions in the field of philosophy. These distinctions also play a central role in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science. To begin with, the first distinction in KR&R is that we identify knowledge with knowledge that such-and-such holds (possibly to a degree), rather than knowing how. If you ask an expert tennis player how he manages to serve a ball at 130 miles per hour on his first serve, and then serve a safer, topspin serve on his second should the first be out, you may well receive a confession that, if truth be told, this athlete can't really tell you. He just does it; he does something he has been doing since his youth. Yet, there is no denying that he knows how to serve. In contrast, the knowledge in KR&R must be expressible in declarative statements. For example, our tennis player knows that if his first serve lands outside the service box, it's not in play. He thus knows a proposition, conditional in form.
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:14
  3. Hodgson, J.P.E.: Knowledge representation and language in AI (1991) 0.05
    0.04858137 = product of:
      0.09716274 = sum of:
        0.09716274 = product of:
          0.19432548 = sum of:
            0.19432548 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 1529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19432548 = score(doc=1529,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.71875954 = fieldWeight in 1529, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this book is to highlight the relationship between knowledge representation and language in artificial intelligence, and in particular on the way in which the choice of representation influences the language used to discuss a problem - and vice versa. Opening with a discussion of knowledge representation methods, and following this with a look at reasoning methods, the author begins to make his case for the intimate relationship between language and representation. He shows how each representation method fits particularly well with some reasoning methods and less so with others, using specific languages as examples. The question of representation change, an important and complex issue about which very little is known, is addressed. Dr Hodgson gathers together recent work on problem solving, showing how, in some cases, it has been possible to use representation changes to recast problems into a language that makes them easier to solve. The author maintains throughout that the relationships that this book explores lie at the heart of the construction of large systems, examining a number of the current large AI systems from the viewpoint of representation and language to prove his point.
    COMPASS
    Artificial intelligence
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence
    Series
    Ellis Horwood series in artificial intelligence
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence
    Artificial intelligence
  4. Developments in applied artificial intelligence : proceedings / 16th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE 2003, Loughborough, UK, June 23 - 26, 2003 (2003) 0.05
    0.04858137 = product of:
      0.09716274 = sum of:
        0.09716274 = product of:
          0.19432548 = sum of:
            0.19432548 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19432548 = score(doc=441,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.71875954 = fieldWeight in 441, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE 2003, held in Loughborough, UK in June 2003. The 81 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from more than 140 submissions. Among the topics addressed are soft computing, fuzzy logic, diagnosis, knowledge representation, knowledge management, automated reasoning, machine learning, planning and scheduling, evolutionary computation, computer vision, agent systems, algorithmic learning, tutoring systems, financial analysis, etc.
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence / Industrial applications / Congresses
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science ; Vol. 2718 : Lecture notes in artificial intelligence
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence / Industrial applications / Congresses
  5. Nagao, M.: Knowledge and inference (1990) 0.04
    0.04434851 = product of:
      0.08869702 = sum of:
        0.08869702 = product of:
          0.17739405 = sum of:
            0.17739405 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17739405 = score(doc=3304,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.6561346 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge and Inference discusses an important problem for software systems: How do we treat knowledge and ideas on a computer and how do we use inference to solve problems on a computer? The book talks about the problems of knowledge and inference for the purpose of merging artificial intelligence and library science. The book begins by clarifying the concept of ""knowledge"" from many points of view, followed by a chapter on the current state of library science and the place of artificial intelligence in library science. Subsequent chapters cover central topics in the artificial intelligence: search and problem solving, methods of making proofs, and the use of knowledge in looking for a proof. There is also a discussion of how to use the knowledge system. The final chapter describes a popular expert system. It describes tools for building expert systems using an example based on Expert Systems-A Practical Introduction by P. Sell (Macmillian, 1985). This type of software is called an ""expert system shell."" This book was written as a textbook for undergraduate students covering only the basics but explaining as much detail as possible.
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.040420916 = product of:
      0.08084183 = sum of:
        0.08084183 = product of:
          0.24252549 = sum of:
            0.24252549 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24252549 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43152615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Semantic applications (2018) 0.04
    0.03966652 = product of:
      0.07933304 = sum of:
        0.07933304 = product of:
          0.15866607 = sum of:
            0.15866607 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15866607 = score(doc=5204,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.58686465 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence
    Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics)
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence
    Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics)
  8. Blobel, B.: Ontologies, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence : hype or prerequisite for international pHealth interoperability? (2011) 0.04
    0.039267853 = product of:
      0.078535706 = sum of:
        0.078535706 = product of:
          0.15707141 = sum of:
            0.15707141 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15707141 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.5809664 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Nowadays, eHealth and pHealth solutions have to meet advanced interoperability challenges. Enabling pervasive computing and even autonomic computing, pHealth system architectures cover many domains, scientifically managed by specialized disciplines using their specific ontologies. Therefore, semantic interoperability has to advance from a communication protocol to an ontology coordination challenge including semantic integration, bringing knowledge representation and artificial intelligence on the table. The resulting solutions comprehensively support multi-lingual and multi-jurisdictional environments.
  9. Miller, R.: Three problems in logic-based knowledge representation (2006) 0.03
    0.033658158 = product of:
      0.067316316 = sum of:
        0.067316316 = product of:
          0.13463263 = sum of:
            0.13463263 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13463263 = score(doc=660,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.49797118 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to give a non-technical overview of some of the technical progress made recently on tackling three fundamental problems in the area of formal knowledge representation/artificial intelligence. These are the Frame Problem, the Ramification Problem, and the Qualification Problem. The article aims to describe the development of two logic-based languages, the Event Calculus and Modular-E, to address various aspects of these issues. The article also aims to set this work in the wider context of contemporary developments in applied logic, non-monotonic reasoning and formal theories of common sense. Design/methodology/approach - The study applies symbolic logic to model aspects of human knowledge and reasoning. Findings - The article finds that there are fundamental interdependencies between the three problems mentioned above. The conceptual framework shared by the Event Calculus and Modular-E is appropriate for providing principled solutions to them. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important approach to dealing with three fundamental issues in artificial intelligence.
  10. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.03
    0.033658158 = product of:
      0.067316316 = sum of:
        0.067316316 = product of:
          0.13463263 = sum of:
            0.13463263 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13463263 = score(doc=439,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.49797118 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence
  11. Matuszek, C.; Cabral, J.; Witbrock, M.; DeOliveira, J.: ¬An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc (2006) 0.03
    0.033658158 = product of:
      0.067316316 = sum of:
        0.067316316 = product of:
          0.13463263 = sum of:
            0.13463263 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13463263 = score(doc=4605,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.49797118 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Technical report // American Association for Artificial Intelligence[Technical report / SS] / American Association for Artificial Intelligence: AAAI-SS-06-05
  12. Gayathri, R.; Uma, V.: Ontology based knowledge representation technique, domain modeling languages and planners for robotic path planning : a survey (2018) 0.03
    0.033658158 = product of:
      0.067316316 = sum of:
        0.067316316 = product of:
          0.13463263 = sum of:
            0.13463263 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13463263 = score(doc=5605,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.49797118 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR & R) has become one of the promising fields of Artificial Intelligence. KR is dedicated towards representing information about the domain that can be utilized in path planning. Ontology based knowledge representation and reasoning techniques provide sophisticated knowledge about the environment for processing tasks or methods. Ontology helps in representing the knowledge about environment, events and actions that help in path planning and making robots more autonomous. Knowledge reasoning techniques can infer new conclusion and thus aids planning dynamically in a non-deterministic environment. In the initial sections, the representation of knowledge using ontology and the techniques for reasoning that could contribute in path planning are discussed in detail. In the following section, we also provide comparison of various planning domain modeling languages, ontology editors, planners and robot simulation tools.
    Content
    Part of special issue: SI on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2018.04.008.
  13. Vickery, B.C.: Ontologies (1997) 0.03
    0.031733215 = product of:
      0.06346643 = sum of:
        0.06346643 = product of:
          0.12693286 = sum of:
            0.12693286 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12693286 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.46949172 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the emergence of the term 'ontology' in knowledge engineering (and now in information science) with a definition of the term as currently used. Ontology is the study of what exists and what must be assumed to exist in order to achieve a cogent description or reality. The term has seen extensive application to artificial intelligence. Describes the process of building an ontology and the uses of such tools in knowledge engineering. Concludes by comparing ontologies with similar tools used in information science
  14. Aitken, S.; Reid, S.: Evaluation of an ontology-based information retrieval tool (2000) 0.03
    0.031733215 = product of:
      0.06346643 = sum of:
        0.06346643 = product of:
          0.12693286 = sum of:
            0.12693286 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12693286 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.46949172 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag für: Workshop on the Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, (eds) Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R., Guarino, N., and Uschold, M. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2000, Berlin.
  15. Cumyn, M.; Reiner, G.; Mas, S.; Lesieur, D.: Legal knowledge representation using a faceted scheme (2019) 0.03
    0.031733215 = product of:
      0.06346643 = sum of:
        0.06346643 = product of:
          0.12693286 = sum of:
            0.12693286 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 5788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12693286 = score(doc=5788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.46949172 = fieldWeight in 5788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 17-21, 2019 [https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326735]
  16. Bouramoul, A.: ¬The semantic dimension in information retrieval, from document indexing to query reformulation (2011) 0.03
    0.028048465 = product of:
      0.05609693 = sum of:
        0.05609693 = product of:
          0.11219386 = sum of:
            0.11219386 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 4740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11219386 = score(doc=4740,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.414976 = fieldWeight in 4740, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag innerhalb einer Special Section: Knowledge Organization, Competitive Intelligence, and Information Systems - Papers from 4th International Conference on "Information Systems & Economic Intelligence," February 17-19th, 2011. Marrakech - Morocco. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_38_2011_5f.pdf.
  17. Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017) 0.03
    0.028048465 = product of:
      0.05609693 = sum of:
        0.05609693 = product of:
          0.11219386 = sum of:
            0.11219386 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11219386 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.414976 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Artificial intelligence
    Subject
    Artificial intelligence
  18. Branch, F.; Arias, T.; Kennah, J.; Phillips, R.; Windleharth, T.; Lee, J.H.: Representing transmedia fictional worlds through ontology (2017) 0.03
    0.028048465 = product of:
      0.05609693 = sum of:
        0.05609693 = product of:
          0.11219386 = sum of:
            0.11219386 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11219386 = score(doc=3958,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.414976 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, there is no structured data standard for representing elements commonly found in transmedia fictional worlds. Although there are websites dedicated to individual universes, the information found on these sites separate out the various formats, concentrate on only the bibliographic aspects of the material, and are only searchable with full text. We have created an ontological model that will allow various user groups interested in transmedia to search for and retrieve the information contained in these worlds based upon their structure. We conducted a domain analysis and user studies based on the contents of Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, the Marvel Universe, and Star Wars in order to build a new model using Ontology Web Language (OWL) and an artificial intelligence-reasoning engine. This model can infer connections between transmedia properties such as characters, elements of power, items, places, events, and so on. This model will facilitate better search and retrieval of the information contained within these vast story universes for all users interested in them. The result of this project is an OWL ontology reflecting real user needs based upon user research, which is intuitive for users and can be used by artificial intelligence systems.
  19. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03
    0.026947279 = product of:
      0.053894557 = sum of:
        0.053894557 = product of:
          0.16168366 = sum of:
            0.16168366 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16168366 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43152615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  20. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.026947279 = product of:
      0.053894557 = sum of:
        0.053894557 = product of:
          0.16168366 = sum of:
            0.16168366 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16168366 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43152615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

Years

Languages

  • e 76
  • d 12
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 61
  • el 21
  • m 15
  • s 7
  • x 6
  • r 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects