-
Frei, H.P.; Meienberg, S.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The perils of interpreting recall and precision values (1991)
0.02
0.015501413 = product of:
0.046504237 = sum of:
0.046504237 = product of:
0.09300847 = sum of:
0.09300847 = weight(_text_:networks in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300847 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The traditional recall and precision measure is inappropriate when retrieval algorithms that retrieve information from Wide Area Networks are evaluated. The principle reason is that information available in WANs is dynamic and its size os orders of magnitude greater than the size of the usual test collections. To overcome these problems, a new efffectiveness measure has been developed, which we call the 'usefulness measure'
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.01
0.014869343 = product of:
0.044608027 = sum of:
0.044608027 = product of:
0.08921605 = sum of:
0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08921605 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.01
0.014869343 = product of:
0.044608027 = sum of:
0.044608027 = product of:
0.08921605 = sum of:
0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08921605 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.01
0.014869343 = product of:
0.044608027 = sum of:
0.044608027 = product of:
0.08921605 = sum of:
0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08921605 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.01
0.014869343 = product of:
0.044608027 = sum of:
0.044608027 = product of:
0.08921605 = sum of:
0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08921605 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
-
Salampasis, M.; Tait, J.; Bloor, C.: Evaluation of information-seeking performance in hypermedia digital libraries (1998)
0.01
0.013563735 = product of:
0.040691204 = sum of:
0.040691204 = product of:
0.08138241 = sum of:
0.08138241 = weight(_text_:networks in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08138241 = score(doc=3759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses current information retrieval methods based on recall (R) and precision (P) for evaluating information retrieval and examines their suitability for evaluating the performance of hypermedia digital libraries. Proposes a new quantitative evaluation methodology, based on the structural analysis of hypermedia networks and the navigational and search state patterns of information seekers. Although the proposed methodology retains some of the characteristics of R and P evaluation, it could be more suitable than them for measuring the performance of information-seeking environments where information seekers can utilize arbitrary mixtures of browsing and query-based searching strategies
-
MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989)
0.01
0.011626059 = product of:
0.034878176 = sum of:
0.034878176 = product of:
0.06975635 = sum of:
0.06975635 = weight(_text_:networks in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06975635 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.01
0.010620959 = product of:
0.031862877 = sum of:
0.031862877 = product of:
0.063725755 = sum of:
0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063725755 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.01
0.010620959 = product of:
0.031862877 = sum of:
0.031862877 = product of:
0.063725755 = sum of:
0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063725755 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.01
0.010620959 = product of:
0.031862877 = sum of:
0.031862877 = product of:
0.063725755 = sum of:
0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063725755 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 19. 3.1996 11:22:12
-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
-
Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
-
Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
-
Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 20:22:46
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.01
0.008496767 = product of:
0.0254903 = sum of:
0.0254903 = product of:
0.0509806 = sum of:
0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0509806 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
-
Naderi, H.; Rumpler, B.: PERCIRS: a system to combine personalized and collaborative information retrieval (2010)
0.01
0.0077507063 = product of:
0.023252118 = sum of:
0.023252118 = product of:
0.046504237 = sum of:
0.046504237 = weight(_text_:networks in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046504237 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.2090349 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss and test the claim that utilization of the personalization techniques can be valuable to improve the efficiency of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) systems. Design/methodology/approach - A new personalized CIR system, called PERCIRS, is presented based on the user profile similarity calculation (UPSC) formulas. To this aim, the paper proposes several UPSC formulas as well as two techniques to evaluate them. As the proposed CIR system is personalized, it could not be evaluated by Cranfield, like evaluation techniques (e.g. TREC). Hence, this paper proposes a new user-centric mechanism, which enables PERCIRS to be evaluated. This mechanism is generic and can be used to evaluate any other personalized IR system. Findings - The results show that among the proposed UPSC formulas in this paper, the (query-document)-graph based formula is the most effective. After integrating this formula into PERCIRS and comparing it with nine other IR systems, it is concluded that the results of the system are better than the other IR systems. In addition, the paper shows that the complexity of the system is less that the complexity of the other CIR systems. Research limitations/implications - This system asks the users to explicitly rank the returned documents, while explicit ranking is still not widespread enough. However it believes that the users should actively participate in the IR process in order to aptly satisfy their needs to information. Originality/value - The value of this paper lies in combining collaborative and personalized IR, as well as introducing a mechanism which enables the personalized IR system to be evaluated. The proposed evaluation mechanism is very valuable for developers of personalized IR systems. The paper also introduces some significant user profile similarity calculation formulas, and two techniques to evaluate them. These formulas can also be used to find the user's community in the social networks.
-
Leiva-Mederos, A.; Senso, J.A.; Hidalgo-Delgado, Y.; Hipola, P.: Working framework of semantic interoperability for CRIS with heterogeneous data sources (2017)
0.01
0.0077507063 = product of:
0.023252118 = sum of:
0.023252118 = product of:
0.046504237 = sum of:
0.046504237 = weight(_text_:networks in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046504237 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.047034867 = queryNorm
0.2090349 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose Information from Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) is stored in different formats, in platforms that are not compatible, or even in independent networks. It would be helpful to have a well-defined methodology to allow for management data processing from a single site, so as to take advantage of the capacity to link disperse data found in different systems, platforms, sources and/or formats. Based on functionalities and materials of the VLIR project, the purpose of this paper is to present a model that provides for interoperability by means of semantic alignment techniques and metadata crosswalks, and facilitates the fusion of information stored in diverse sources. Design/methodology/approach After reviewing the state of the art regarding the diverse mechanisms for achieving semantic interoperability, the paper analyzes the following: the specific coverage of the data sets (type of data, thematic coverage and geographic coverage); the technical specifications needed to retrieve and analyze a distribution of the data set (format, protocol, etc.); the conditions of re-utilization (copyright and licenses); and the "dimensions" included in the data set as well as the semantics of these dimensions (the syntax and the taxonomies of reference). The semantic interoperability framework here presented implements semantic alignment and metadata crosswalk to convert information from three different systems (ABCD, Moodle and DSpace) to integrate all the databases in a single RDF file. Findings The paper also includes an evaluation based on the comparison - by means of calculations of recall and precision - of the proposed model and identical consultations made on Open Archives Initiative and SQL, in order to estimate its efficiency. The results have been satisfactory enough, due to the fact that the semantic interoperability facilitates the exact retrieval of information. Originality/value The proposed model enhances management of the syntactic and semantic interoperability of the CRIS system designed. In a real setting of use it achieves very positive results.
