-
Mudge, S.; Hoek, D.J.: Describing jazz, blues, and popular 78 rpm sound recordings : suggestions and guidelines (2000)
0.07
0.067617394 = product of:
0.20285217 = sum of:
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=965,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.17506863 = weight(_text_:discs in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17506863 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28354502 = queryWeight, product of:
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.617428 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Since 78 rpm sound recordings of jazz, blues, and popular music are today a specialized medium, they receive limited attention in cataloging rules and guides. The cataloging of 78 rpm discs at Indiana University's Archives of Traditional Music is based on established standards; nevertheless, certain local decisions are necessary when general rules are not clear. The Archives' decisions related to the description of their 78 rpm collections are explained and presented with examples in MARC format, and issues of access related to the choice of main entry are also covered
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.21-47
-
Crawford, W.: Codies, bloatware, and bibliographic training (1998)
0.06
0.064584516 = product of:
0.2906303 = sum of:
0.007676664 = weight(_text_:of in 3584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007676664 = score(doc=3584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 3584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3584)
0.28295365 = weight(_text_:discs in 3584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28295365 = score(doc=3584,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28354502 = queryWeight, product of:
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.9979144 = fieldWeight in 3584, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3584)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Comments on CD-ROM discs reviewed for the categories of Best Upgrades and Best Overall Multimedia in the Software Publishers Association Codies awards. Suggests that CD-ROM products are being produced with hard disk space requirements that are too high for the home market. Reviews 3 CD-ROM discs for cataloguing training all from InfoTrain: CatSkill (a multimedia course on AACR2 and MARC); CatSkill: USMARC made Easy; and CatSkill: Format Integration Made Easy
-
Thorburn, C.; Ringler, R.: Cataloging serial computer files (1993)
0.04
0.043382194 = product of:
0.19521987 = sum of:
0.02015124 = weight(_text_:of in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02015124 = score(doc=60,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
0.17506863 = weight(_text_:discs in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17506863 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28354502 = queryWeight, product of:
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.617428 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reports from the North American Serials Interest Group (NASIG) 7th annual conference at the Univ. of Illinois, June'92. Paper presented during the workshop session reports. Examines problems relating to the cataloguing of serial computer files and discusses methods of providing catalogue access to the newer types of computer files. Provides an overview of the complexities of cataloguing 'new tech serials'. Compares the cataloguing of floppy discs using serials and computer files format. Describes the cataloguing of magnetic tapes and the problems associated with them. Covers the cataloguing of CD-ROMs, single electronic journals available directly from the producer and full-text journals available in commercial databases
-
Havens, C.: Cataloging a special art collection (1989)
0.04
0.038634136 = product of:
0.1738536 = sum of:
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=444,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.15740019 = weight(_text_:compact in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15740019 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Since 1986, a project has been underway to catalogue a private collection of the massive body of work of the artist Anne Ward Huey. The project has progressed from a handwritten card file to a computer file using AACR2 and OCLC tags and format. A compact disc or videotape file is also presently projected. In addition to taking traditional libray cataloguing out of the library setting, the project has addressed a number of problems involved in cataloguing silkscreen prints, and the records created by the project also contain information that AACR2 does not specifically address but that artists consider important. Recommends that the cataloguing rules be revised to encompass these specific aspects of cataloguing art work.
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.04
0.037962444 = product of:
0.0854155 = sum of:
0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030467471 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031220913 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.01410293 = weight(_text_:of in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01410293 = score(doc=941,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.009624182 = product of:
0.028872546 = sum of:
0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028872546 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
-
Hoban, M.S.: Sound recording cataloging : a practical approach (1990)
0.03
0.033114973 = product of:
0.14901738 = sum of:
0.01410293 = weight(_text_:of in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01410293 = score(doc=500,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
0.13491444 = weight(_text_:compact in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13491444 = score(doc=500,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26885647 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The cataloging of music sound recordings is both challenging and interesting. As the technologies used to produce sound recordings change, these changes must be reflected in both cataloging theory and practice. Three formats: analog disc, cassette tape, and compact disk, all of which are readily available on the market, present special challenges to catalogers who must consider what might be the most effective way of handling these materials following the AACR2 cataloging rules and interpretations from Library of Congress. This paper examines the actual cataloging of those formats as done by several institutions and raises questions such as how to handle these materials in ways which will eliminate redundancy and increase efficiency in the practice of cataloging. Finally, an alternative approach, drawing on AACR2 practice in other areas, is suggested.
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.03
0.028509554 = product of:
0.08552866 = sum of:
0.050983537 = weight(_text_:use in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050983537 = score(doc=43,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4687847 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.021712884 = weight(_text_:of in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021712884 = score(doc=43,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.012832243 = product of:
0.03849673 = sum of:
0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03849673 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.03
0.02683727 = product of:
0.08051181 = sum of:
0.051511873 = weight(_text_:use in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051511873 = score(doc=366,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=366,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.011228213 = product of:
0.033684637 = sum of:
0.033684637 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033684637 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Raghavan, K.S.; Neelameghan, A.: Composite multimedia works on CD : catalogue entry according to ISBD (ER) and AACR-2 Revision 1998 (2002)
0.03
0.02635768 = product of:
0.07907304 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=5622,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Gives operational definitions of work, associated work, composite work and other selected terms. Mentions the challenges posed by the abundant availability of digital resources in different media, forms and formats to catalogers in particular and information professionals in general. Discusses with examples the applicability and adequacy of the rules and prescriptions of ISBD(ER) and AACR2, 1998 rev. for cataloging multimedia resources on CD, in view of the fact that the record medium, the physical form and format affect the effectiveness of accessing, retrieval and use of a work.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Lau, S.-f.; Wang, V.: Chinese personal names and titles : problems in cataloging and retrieval (1991)
0.03
0.02635768 = product of:
0.07907304 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=513,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=513,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The increasing availability of Chinese language materials and other materials of Chinese authorship in North American libraries are posing major complications for cataloging which lead to retrieval problems, as exemplified by Chinese personal names and titles in this study. These complications include: the intricate nature of the Chinese script along with the extensive use of the traditional and simplified Chinese characters, and the application of variant romanizatlon schemes. includine Pinyin. Proposed solutions to improve access to Chinese language materials include: providing more access points in Pinyin form, establishing standards for international practice in romanizing Chinese personal names and in publishing the order of the family and given names of all authors, and linking cataloging authority files with OPACs.
-
Long, C.E.: ¬The Internet's value to catalogers : results of a survey (1997)
0.02
0.024950301 = product of:
0.0748509 = sum of:
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.01410293 = weight(_text_:of in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01410293 = score(doc=494,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.038671453 = product of:
0.058007177 = sum of:
0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029134631 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028872546 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a questionnaire survey of cataloguers, conducted over the AUTOCAT Internet discussion group, to determine those areas of cataloguing for which the Internet is a valuable tool and those areas for which it is not as useful. Respondents indicated 4 areas in which cataloguers use the Internet: searching the OPACs of other libraries, communicating with colleagues, accessing online cataloguing documentation and publications, and authority work. Cataloguers who found access to other libraries' OPACs did so for the following reasons: assigning call numbers and subject headings; finding full cataloguing copy from other libraries; enriching their local catalogue with notes present in records in other libraries; finding copy for foreign language items that cannot be read by library staff; and resolving difficult problems when important parts of the item are missing ar are in disarray. Some cataloguers also related processes for which they have found the Internet to not be efficient
- Date
- 29. 8.1997 19:46:22
-
Copeland, A.: Works and digital resources in the catalog : electronic versions of Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe (2002)
0.02
0.024389451 = product of:
0.07316835 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.022278037 = weight(_text_:of in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022278037 = score(doc=5620,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
- Content
- The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake's Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects.
-
Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging (2007)
0.02
0.023680521 = product of:
0.07104156 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.02015124 = weight(_text_:of in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02015124 = score(doc=1677,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- An explanation of where FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) comes from, given by a look at the work of librarians such as Panizzi, Cutter, Ranganathan, and Lubetzky, and an examination of four themes in the history of library cataloging: the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs, the importance of user needs, the idea of the "work," and standardization and internationalization.
- Source
- Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
-
RDA: Resource Description and Access Print (2014)
0.02
0.023039646 = product of:
0.051839203 = sum of:
0.014362504 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014362504 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.014717679 = weight(_text_:use in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014717679 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.13532647 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=2049,freq=36.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.006474362 = product of:
0.019423086 = sum of:
0.019423086 = weight(_text_:29 in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019423086 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Designed for the digital world and an expanding universe of metadata users, RDA: Resource Description and Access is the new, unified cataloguing standard. Benefits of RDA include: - A structure based on the conceptual models of FRBR (functional requirements for bibliographic data) and FRAD (functional requirements for authority data) to help catalog users find the information they need more easily - A flexible framework for content description of digital resources that also serves the needs of libraries organizing traditional resources - A better fit with emerging technologies, enabling institutions to introduce efficiencies in data capture and storage retrieval. The online RDA Toolkit provides a one-stop resource for evaluating and implementing RDA, and is the most effective way to interact with the new standard. It includes searchable and browseable RDA instructions; two views of RDA content, by table of contents and by element set; user-created and sharable Workflows and Mappings-tools to customize RDA to support your organization's training, internal processes, and local policies; Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PS) and links to other relevant cataloguing resources; and the full text of AACR2 with links to RDA. This full-text print version of RDA offers a snapshot that serves as an offline access point to help solo and part-time cataloguers evaluate RDA, as well as to support training and classroom use in any size institution. An index is included. The online RDA Toolkit includes PDFs, but purchasing the print version offers a convenient, time-saving option.
- Content
- The 2014 RDA Print Revision contains: - A full accumulation of RDA-the revision contains a full set of all current RDA instructions. It replaces the previous version of RDA Print rather than being an update packet to that version. Numerous changes to the text of RDA have been made since the publication of the 2013 Revision. Cataloging practice described by RDA has not altered dramatically due to these changes, but over 70 percent of the pages in RDA Print were affected by the changes, making an RDA Print update packet impracticable. - The most current RDA-the revision contains all changes to RDA up to and including the 2014 RDA Update approved by the JSC. There are two types of changes to RDA that routinely take place-"Fast Track" changes and RDA Updates. The JSC periodically issues Fast Track changes to RDA to fix errors and to clarify meaning. These changes do not typically change cataloging practice as described by RDA. An RDA Update is issued annually. In an Update process the JSC considers proposals to enhance and improve RDA as a cataloging standard. An Update can and often does change the cataloging process described in RDA. The 2014 Revision includes all Fast Track changes and RDA Updates since the 2013 publication of RDA and through August 2014. Vgl. auch: http://www.rda-jsc.org.
- Date
- 9. 6.2015 17:30:29
-
Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994)
0.02
0.022942884 = product of:
0.06882865 = sum of:
0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030467471 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=866,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
-
Leigh, A.: Lucy is enceinte : the power of an action in defining a work (2002)
0.02
0.022942884 = product of:
0.06882865 = sum of:
0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030467471 = score(doc=5629,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076517 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=5629,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Although performed works are defined based on their collaborative nature and rules for mixed responsibility in AACR2R, descriptive practices are vague when applied to the cataloging of a television series-a type of performed work. Is the umbrella title identical as the title expressed in a bibliographic series? Or is it the collective title of the work and each episode a part? A key factor in this decision is in understanding how performed works are distinct from textual works. By highlighting the seminal television situation comedy I Love Lucy as an example, it is argued that a textual approach provides an incomplete methodology for the retrieval of the component parts of a television series. Descriptive areas in AACR2R are explored, particularly issues related to seriality, whole-part relationships, and the use of work identifiers in the collocation of episodes.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Gatenby, J.; Thornburg, G.; Weitz, J.: Collected work clustering in WorldCat : three techniques for maintaining records (2015)
0.02
0.022665858 = product of:
0.067997575 = sum of:
0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021543756 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031220913 = score(doc=2276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.015232908 = weight(_text_:of in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015232908 = score(doc=2276,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- WorldCat records are clustered into works, and within works, into content and manifestation clusters. A recent project revisited the clustering of collected works that had been previously sidelined because of the challenges posed by their complexity. Attention was given to both the identification of collected works and to the determination of the component works within them. By extensively analysing cast-list information, performance notes, contents notes, titles, uniform titles and added entries, the contents of collected works could be identified and differentiated so that correct clustering was achieved. Further work is envisaged in the form of refining the tests and weights and also in the creation and use of name/title authority records and other knowledge cards in clustering. There is a requirement to link collected works with their component works for use in search and retrieval.
-
Lundy, M.W.: Use and perception of the DCRB Core standard (2003)
0.02
0.022152148 = product of:
0.066456445 = sum of:
0.041137166 = weight(_text_:use in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041137166 = score(doc=153,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.37824902 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
0.017299127 = weight(_text_:of in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017299127 = score(doc=153,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
0.008020152 = product of:
0.024060456 = sum of:
0.024060456 = weight(_text_:22 in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024060456 = score(doc=153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- In January 1999, the Program for Cooperative Cataloging approved the core bibliographic standard for rare books, called the DCRB Core standard. Like the other core standards, the DCRB Core provides the framework within which catalogers can create bibliographic records that are less than full, but are as reliable as full-level records in description and authorized headings. In the three years since its approval, there is little evidence that the standard has been widely used. This study reports the results of a survey sent to forty-three participants who indicated in a preliminary query that they do use the DCRB Core or that they have made the decision not to use it. In the thirty-seven surveys that were returned, only about 16% of the respondents said they have used the standard to create bibliographic records for their rare books. The libraries that do not use the core standard find it inferior or lacking in a number of ways. Several of those libraries, however, are planning to use the standard in the future or are seriously planning to investigate using it. Such intent may indicate that the time is approaching when more libraries will find reasons to implement the standard. One impetus may come from the findings of a recent survey of the special collections departments of member libraries of the Association of Research Libraries that emphasize the size of the backlogs in those departments. If faster accessibility to specific portions of the backlogs would benefit users more than having fulllevel cataloging, application of the DCRB Core standard could facilitate reducing those backlogs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Malbin, S.L.: Does AMC really means 'archives made confusing'? : Retesting patron understanding (1998)
0.02
0.021970056 = product of:
0.06591017 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=3377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=3377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.01501985 = weight(_text_:of in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01501985 = score(doc=3377,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Builds on an earlier study that found the MARC AMC format confusing to users. To decide whether this stemmed from a lack of knowledge among users, or from the records, a study surveyed 2 groups, only 1 of which was familiar with USMARC. The results showed the level of user knowledge to be an issue, but only on some questions. On others, the problem stemmed from the record. The impliation are that for distant retrieval to work, MARC AMC information must become more standardized and user education, including the use of help screens, must be tailored to the problems of distant retrievers
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.02
0.021368679 = product of:
0.06410603 = sum of:
0.0364244 = weight(_text_:use in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0364244 = score(doc=4121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.011228213 = product of:
0.033684637 = sum of:
0.033684637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033684637 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
