Search (606 results, page 1 of 31)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Bradley, P.: Going online, CD-ROM and the Internet (1997) 0.28
    0.27580154 = product of:
      0.44128248 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=1726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
        0.06844692 = weight(_text_:use in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06844692 = score(doc=1726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=1726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
        0.18729854 = sum of:
          0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024969954 = score(doc=1726,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
          0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16232859 = score(doc=1726,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
        0.10089115 = product of:
          0.2017823 = sum of:
            0.2017823 = weight(_text_:computers in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2017823 = score(doc=1726,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.92941 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    Subject
    Information retrieval / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  2. Chylkowska, E.: Implementation of information exchange : online dictionaries (2005) 0.09
    0.08734034 = product of:
      0.17468068 = sum of:
        0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021389665 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
        0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015778005 = score(doc=3011,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
        0.12352589 = sum of:
          0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022070529 = score(doc=3011,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
          0.10145536 = weight(_text_:line in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10145536 = score(doc=3011,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.43811268 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
        0.013987125 = product of:
          0.02797425 = sum of:
            0.02797425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02797425 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    We are living in a society in which using Internet is a part of everyday life. People use Internet at schools, universities, at work in small and big companies. The Web gives huge number of information from every possible field of knowledge, and one of the problems that one can face by searching through the web is the fact that this information may be written in many different languages that one does not understand. That is why web site designers came up with an idea to create on-line dictionaries to make surfing on the Web easier. The most popular are bilingual dictionaries (in Poland the most known are: LING.pl, LEKSYKA.pl, and Dict.pl), but one can find also multilingual ones (Logos.com, Lexicool.com). Nowadays, when using Internet in education becomes more and more popular, on-line dictionaries are the best supplement for a good quality work. The purpose of this paper is to present, compare and recommend the best (from the author's point of view) multilingual dictionaries that can be found on the Internet and that can serve educational purposes well.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:05:56
    Source
    Librarianship in the information age: Proceedings of the 13th BOBCATSSS Symposium, 31 January - 2 February 2005 in Budapest, Hungary. Eds.: Marte Langeland u.a
  3. Harter, S.: On-line encyclopedias (1985) 0.07
    0.07068273 = product of:
      0.2827309 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 6193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=6193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6193)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 6193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=6193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 6193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6193)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 6193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=6193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 6193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6193)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.38, [=Suppl.3]
  4. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.07
    0.06505494 = product of:
      0.17347983 = sum of:
        0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022089208 = score(doc=5170,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14366594 = sum of:
          0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.088279754 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.05538619 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05538619 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey of all academic members of the Association of Research Libraries in the 4th quarter of 1997 which examined how academic libraries incorporate electronic information sources into their reference activities and the effects on libraries services. There was a response rate of 68 per cent, Compares results surveys carried out in 1991 and 1994. The survey covered: numbers of computers access options (intermediary, end user online, CD-ROM locally loaded databases or those accessible through the library catalogue and the Internet. There is a trend away from print resources, particularly indexing and abstracting materials, and away from CD-ROM LANs and local loading of databases towards remote online resources
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  5. CD-ROM reviews 1987-1990 : optical product reviews from CD-ROM librarian (1991) 0.06
    0.062044926 = product of:
      0.16545314 = sum of:
        0.06049911 = weight(_text_:use in 800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06049911 = score(doc=800,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47845137 = fieldWeight in 800, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=800)
        0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015778005 = score(doc=800,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 800, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=800)
        0.08917602 = product of:
          0.17835204 = sum of:
            0.17835204 = weight(_text_:computers in 800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17835204 = score(doc=800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.82149017 = fieldWeight in 800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    COMPASS
    Libraries / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Subject
    Libraries / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
  6. Zimmer, D.E.: Neues Leben für die Dicke : die Encyclopaedia Britannica geht on line - für sie eine Frage des Überlebens (1995) 0.06
    0.058057297 = product of:
      0.23222919 = sum of:
        0.19866009 = sum of:
          0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026484637 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
          0.17217545 = weight(_text_:line in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17217545 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.74350184 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
        0.033569098 = product of:
          0.067138195 = sum of:
            0.067138195 = weight(_text_:22 in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067138195 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1996 20:27:22
  7. Ensor, P.: CD-ROM research collection : an evaluative guide to bibliographic and full-text CD-ROM databases (1991) 0.06
    0.056712303 = product of:
      0.15123281 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=830,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
        0.08737431 = product of:
          0.17474861 = sum of:
            0.17474861 = weight(_text_:computers in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17474861 = score(doc=830,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.8048927 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    COMPASS
    Libraries / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.2, S.104 (E.F. SantaVicca); IfB 1(1993) H.3/4, S.153-155
    Series
    Computers in libraries: suppl.38
    Subject
    Libraries / Use of / Compact discs (Computers)
  8. Esposito, J.J.: Very like a whale : the world of reference publishing (1996) 0.05
    0.05283616 = product of:
      0.10567232 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=6661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=6661,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=6661,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.044139877 = product of:
          0.088279754 = sum of:
            0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088279754 = score(doc=6661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    There is no generally agreed definition of reference publishing in the industry today. Identifies attributes which are more likely to be associated with reference publishing than with publishing of the non-reference sort, including comprehensiveness, objectivity, authoritativeness, strong reliance on brand names, a disinclination to pay royalties and the common strategy of internal product development. Reference publishers conceive their publications as existing in a larger information context, providing 'background'. discusses the use of computers in reference publishing, both in production, and in publishing itself, on CD-ROM or online. Argues that current CD-ROM reference works are not true reference works as they are used generally as a goreground activity, not as a source of background information. Sees the future of CD-ROM publishing as entertainment publishing and predicts that reference publishing will go online
  9. Crellin, J.: Implications of CD-ROMs for reference services in university libraries (1992) 0.05
    0.049980234 = product of:
      0.19992094 = sum of:
        0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012622404 = score(doc=3115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
        0.18729854 = sum of:
          0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024969954 = score(doc=3115,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
          0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16232859 = score(doc=3115,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the advantages of CD-ROMs over printed and on-line sources: large storage capacity, relative cheapness and minimum instruction required to undertake searches. Identifies 5 main criteria from the literature which should be considered when introducing this technology into reference libraries. Cost, currency and contents should be considered when comparing their usefulness with other media. At present, CD-ROMs offer the most efficient service when used in conjunction with both printed and on-line media
  10. MacCall, S.L.; Cleveland, A.D.; Gibson, I.E.: Outline and preliminary evaluation of the classical digital library model (1999) 0.05
    0.049416315 = product of:
      0.09883263 = sum of:
        0.036153924 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036153924 = score(doc=6541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
        0.037047986 = weight(_text_:use in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037047986 = score(doc=6541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29299045 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
        0.02011309 = weight(_text_:of in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02011309 = score(doc=6541,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
        0.0055176322 = product of:
          0.0110352645 = sum of:
            0.0110352645 = weight(_text_:on in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0110352645 = score(doc=6541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The growing number of networked information resources and services offers unprecedented opportunities for delivering high quality information to the computer desktop of a wide range of individuals. However, currently there is a reliance on a database retrieval model, in which endusers use keywords to search large collections of automatically indexed resources in order to find needed information. As an alternative to the database retrieval model, this paper outlines the classical digital library model, which is derived from traditional practices of library and information science professionals. These practices include the selection and organization of information resources for local populations of users and the integration of advanced information retrieval tools, such as databases and the Internet into these collections. To evaluate this model, library and information professionals and endusers involved with primary care medicine were asked to respond to a series of questions comparing their experiences with a digital library developed for the primary care population to their experiences with general Internet use. Preliminary results are reported
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  11. Rickard, S.: Information retrieval strategies in McGraw-Hill's Multimedia Encyclopedia of Mammalian Biology (1993) 0.05
    0.046456493 = product of:
      0.09291299 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
        0.036299463 = weight(_text_:use in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036299463 = score(doc=3704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
        0.022201622 = weight(_text_:of in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022201622 = score(doc=3704,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
        0.009363732 = product of:
          0.018727465 = sum of:
            0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018727465 = score(doc=3704,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Multimedia Encyclopedia of Mammalian Biologie CD-ROM was published by McGraw-Hill in Sept 92. It has been designed for use primarily at undergraduate level. Text, images, sound and movie clips and numerical information (data) can be accessed on the disc. In this article the concept of Resource Policy, allowing priority to be given to any one of these media types, is described. The principal methods of using the Encyclopedia (Browse and Search) are described. The working of the 4 hierarchical Browsers is outlined, together with the operation of 'Linked Mode'. The methods use to index the data to the Browsers is also discussed and examples of how the disc may be used are given. The text search features available on the disc are also described. These include simple text search, using Boolean operators, and the ability to search the disc not according to the text itself, but using the indexing structures which underpin the Browsers. Attention is drawn to the implications of this approach for structuring information and upon the costs of developing commercial titles
    Object
    McGraw-Hill Multimedia Encyclopedia of Mammalian Biology
  12. Jascó, P.: CD-ROM: hypes and hopes for the rest of the century (1995) 0.04
    0.04278703 = product of:
      0.08557406 = sum of:
        0.044457585 = weight(_text_:use in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044457585 = score(doc=3356,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.35158852 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.017710768 = weight(_text_:of in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017710768 = score(doc=3356,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016784549 = product of:
          0.033569098 = sum of:
            0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033569098 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the current market for CD-ROM databases with particular reference to the online versus CD-ROM versus print debate. Concludes that the most likely scenario is a steady convergence of technologies, at least until the end of the century. Review the current and the most likely future developments in the area of CD-ROM database contents, software, hardware, and marketing. Concludes that users will choose databases on the basis of such factors as: ease of use; power of use; storage and delivery capacity; quality; functionaliy; timeliness; overall appeal; and real cost, not just price. Lists the most likely candidates for successful CD-ROM database development; not yet available. Concludes that Windows user faces will steadily replace DOS based systems, but not unless the Windows replacements are truly better and not just different. Recommends that both Windows and DOS interfaces be loaded onto the same CD-ROM with each database allowing the user to choose which to use. Reviews likely developments in CD-ROM hardware and marketing strategies
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:35:26
  13. Rieh, S.Y.: On the Web at home : information seeking and Web searching in the home environment (2004) 0.04
    0.039781604 = product of:
      0.07956321 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.036299463 = weight(_text_:use in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036299463 = score(doc=2246,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.011594418 = weight(_text_:of in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011594418 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    As more people gain at-home access to the Internet, information seeking an the Web has become embedded in everyday life. The objective of this study was to characterize the home as an information use environment and to identify a range of information seeking and Websearch behaviors at home. Twelve Northern California residents were recruited, and the data were collected through semi-structured at-home interviews based an a self-reported Search Activities Diary that subjects kept over a 3-5 day period. The data were analyzed an four levels: home environment, information seeking goals, information retrieval interaction, and search query. Eindings indicated that the home, indeed, provided a distinct information use environment beyond physical setting alone in which the subjects used the Web for diverse purposes and interests. Based an the findings, the relationships among home environment, Web context, and interaction situation were identified with respect to user goals and information-seeking behaviors.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.8, S.743-753
  14. Roberts, J.R.; Drost, C.A.: Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (2006) 0.04
    0.038951233 = product of:
      0.077902466 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.0078097144 = weight(_text_:of in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078097144 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=4862,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The article focuses on the EBSCO databases that provide services to libraries. The Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) include resources focusing on librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, and information science. LISTA has more than 21,000 articles from more than 600 periodicals and includes more than 5,000 conference papers and reports. In the database, there are also cited references and the number of times the source was used can also be found within the database. These are helpful tips in bibliography researching. The database has also several search options including "Basic Search," "Advanced Search," and Indexes." The EBSCOhost interface is simple to use and easy to grasp while LISTA is a free abstract database.
  15. Shoemaker, J.: ¬The bottom line : are CD-ROM encyclopedias worth the cost? (1995) 0.04
    0.03885443 = product of:
      0.10361182 = sum of:
        0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042349376 = score(doc=2347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.011044604 = weight(_text_:of in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011044604 = score(doc=2347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.05021784 = product of:
          0.10043568 = sum of:
            0.10043568 = weight(_text_:line in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10043568 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    CD-ROM multimedia encyclopedias have rapidly grown in popularity, purport to be cheaper than their print counterparts, and offer 3 big advantages: speed, keyword searching; and multimedia features. However, CD-ROM multimedia encyclopedias do have their limitations. Explains the hidden costs in their use and sets out their drawbacks which include: they can only be used by one person at a time; they are more difficult to network; provisions of more than one station requires a network software licence; and they require specific skills for which training programmes are necessary. Advocates the use of both print and CD-ROM formats in the school library to enable students to choose that which best meets their needs for a particular assignment
  16. Gillham, M.; Buckner, K.: User evaluation of hypermedia encyclopedias (1997) 0.04
    0.038157985 = product of:
      0.10175462 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=458,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=458,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Details the use of multimedia CD-ROMs by people in their homes. Investigates how users interact with the systems and gather data which they consider to be relevant evaluation criteria. Defines what is considered to be interactive multimedia in relation to home products and considers the characteristics of home users. Reviews systems evaluation methods in the fields of computer assisted learning, human computer interaction, and information retrieval. Gives factors considered to be specifically relevant to the home use situation, and details the methods employed in the study
    Source
    Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 6(1997) no.1, S.77-90
  17. Tumlin, M.D.: Point-of-use instruction on CD-ROM : how much is too much? (1993) 0.04
    0.036700897 = product of:
      0.09786905 = sum of:
        0.059891056 = weight(_text_:use in 7792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059891056 = score(doc=7792,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 7792, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7792)
        0.027053645 = weight(_text_:of in 7792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027053645 = score(doc=7792,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 7792, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7792)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 7792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=7792,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 7792, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the issue of point of use user training for users of CD-ROM databases including consideration of whether any such instruction should be provided; whether only minimal instruction should be provided; how library or user type may influence levels of service; and how to balance the reference desk demands in the age of proliferating CD-ROM databases. Concludes that it is unrealistic to expect to place a definite time limit on point of use user training for CD-ROMs, apart from eliminating it altogether. Recognition of the need to balance CD-ROM point of use training with other reference services should help libraries to come closer to the ideal of a prioritized library service
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  18. Van Epps, A.S.: ¬The evolution of electronic reference sources (2005) 0.04
    0.03569982 = product of:
      0.07139964 = sum of:
        0.020873476 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020873476 = score(doc=2581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
        0.030249555 = weight(_text_:use in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030249555 = score(doc=2581,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23922569 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
        0.014758972 = weight(_text_:of in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014758972 = score(doc=2581,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
        0.0055176322 = product of:
          0.0110352645 = sum of:
            0.0110352645 = weight(_text_:on in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0110352645 = score(doc=2581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide a historical look at the development of web versions of reference materials and discuss what makes an easy-to-use and useful electronic handbook. Design/methodology/approach - Electronic reference materials were limited to handbooks available on the web. Observations and assumptions about usability are tested with an information retrieval test for specific tasks in print and online editions of the same texts. Findings - Recommended adoption of those elements which create a well-designed book in combination with robust search capabilities and online presentation result in an easy-to-use and useful electronic reference source. Research limitations/implications - The small sample size that was used for testing limits the ability to draw conclusions, and is used only as an indication of the differences between models. A more thorough look at difference between electronic book aggregates, such as ENGnetBASE, Knovel® and Referex would highlight the best features for electronic reference materials. Practical implications - Advantages to particular models for electronic reference publishing are discussed, raising awareness for product evaluation. Areas of development for electronic reference book publishers or providers are identified. Work in these areas would help ensure maximum efficiency through cross title searching via meta-searching and data manipulation. Originality/value - The paper presents results from some human computer interaction studies about electronic books which have been implemented in a web interface, and the positive effects achieved.
  19. Voigt, K.; Brüggemann, R.: Evaluation criteria for environmental and chemical databases (1998) 0.04
    0.03512086 = product of:
      0.07024172 = sum of:
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
        0.021168415 = weight(_text_:of in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021168415 = score(doc=3296,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016784549 = product of:
          0.033569098 = sum of:
            0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033569098 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The large number and variety of online databases in the field of environment sciences and chemistry underlies the need for a cooperative evaluation approach. Presents 2 evaluation criteria, divided into 4 headings; general criteria (size of data source, cost of 1 hour searching, updating of database, availability on other media); chemical relevant criteria (number of chemicals, identification parameters of chemicals, test set chemicals, development of chemicals), environmental relevant criteria (information parameters for chemicals, parameter development); and criteria describing environmental chemicals (use of chemicals, quality of database). A 6 number scoring system is applied to these criteria and the Hasse diagram technique is presented for 19 bibliographic online databases using these criteria. Using this technique, 'good' and 'bad' databases are identified and changes in the database content from 1995 to 1998 can be visualized
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.247-262
  20. Zielinski, K.; Nielek, R.; Wierzbicki, A.; Jatowt, A.: Computing controversy : formal model and algorithms for detecting controversy on Wikipedia and in search queries (2018) 0.04
    0.03508967 = product of:
      0.07017934 = sum of:
        0.020873476 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020873476 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021389665 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.02011309 = weight(_text_:of in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02011309 = score(doc=5093,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.007803111 = product of:
          0.015606222 = sum of:
            0.015606222 = weight(_text_:on in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015606222 = score(doc=5093,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by the means of automatic methods is especially important. Web searchers could be alerted when the contents they consume are controversial or when they attempt to acquire information on disputed topics. Presenting users with the indications and explanations of the controversy should offer them chance to see the "wider picture" rather than letting them obtain one-sided views. In this work we first introduce a formal model of controversy as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts. Then we propose a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia. Next, we demonstrate how to use the obtained results for the estimation of the controversy level of search queries. The proposed method can be incorporated into search engines as a component responsible for detection of queries related to controversial topics. The method is independent of the search engine's retrieval and search results recommendation algorithms, and is therefore unaffected by a possible filter bubble. Our approach can be also applied in Wikipedia or other knowledge bases for supporting the detection of controversy and content maintenance. Finally, we believe that our results could be useful for social science researchers for understanding the complex nature of controversy and in fostering their studies.

Languages

Types

  • a 487
  • m 77
  • i 64
  • el 25
  • s 15
  • b 12
  • x 3
  • h 1
  • r 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications