Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Chen, H."
  1. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.04
    0.036582813 = product of:
      0.073165625 = sum of:
        0.073165625 = sum of:
          0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030711137 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042454492 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.595-607
  2. Leroy, G.; Chen, H.: Genescene: an ontology-enhanced integration of linguistic and co-occurrence based relations in biomedical texts (2005) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:26:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.5, S.457-468
  3. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.378-393
  4. Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:50:30
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.655-665
  5. Hu, P.J.-H.; Lin, C.; Chen, H.: User acceptance of intelligence and security informatics technology : a study of COPLINK (2005) 0.02
    0.02031351 = product of:
      0.04062702 = sum of:
        0.04062702 = product of:
          0.08125404 = sum of:
            0.08125404 = weight(_text_:technology in 3233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08125404 = score(doc=3233,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.52237993 = fieldWeight in 3233, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The importance of Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) has significantly increased with the rapid and largescale migration of local/national security information from physical media to electronic platforms, including the Internet and information systems. Motivated by the significance of ISI in law enforcement (particularly in the digital government context) and the limited investigations of officers' technology-acceptance decisionmaking, we developed and empirically tested a factor model for explaining law-enforcement officers' technology acceptance. Specifically, our empirical examination targeted the COPLINK technology and involved more than 280 police officers. Overall, our model shows a good fit to the data collected and exhibits satisfactory Power for explaining law-enforcement officers' technology acceptance decisions. Our findings have several implications for research and technology management practices in law enforcement, which are also discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.3, S.235-244
  6. Vishwanath, A.; Chen, H.: Technology clusters : using multidimensional scaling to evaluate and structure technology clusters (2006) 0.02
    0.019194461 = product of:
      0.038388923 = sum of:
        0.038388923 = product of:
          0.076777846 = sum of:
            0.076777846 = weight(_text_:technology in 6006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076777846 = score(doc=6006,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.49360257 = fieldWeight in 6006, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Empirical evidence suggests that the ownership of related products that form a technology cluster is signifIcantly better than the attributes of an innovation at predicting adoption. The treatment of technology clusters, however, has been ad hoc and study specific: Researchers often make a priori assumptions about the relationships between technologies and measure ownership using lists of functionally related technology, without any systematic reasoning. Hence, the authors set out to examine empirically the composition of technology clusters and the differences, if any, in clusters of technologies formed by adopters and nonadopters. Using the Galileo system of multidimensional scaling and the associational diffusion framework, the dissimilarities between 30 technology concepts were scored by adopters and nonadopters. Results indicate clear differences in conceptualization of clusters: Adopters tend to relate technologies based an their functional similarity; here, innovations are perceived to be complementary, and hence, adoption of one technology spurs the adoption of related technologies. On the other hand, nonadopters tend to relate technologies using a stricter ascendancy of association where the adoption of an innovation makes subsequent innovations redundant. The results question the measurement approaches and present an alternative methodology.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.11, S.1451-1460
  7. Vishwanath, A.; Chen, H.: Personal communication technologies as an extension of the self : a cross-cultural comparison of people's associations with technology and their symbolic proximity with others (2008) 0.02
    0.015355568 = product of:
      0.030711137 = sum of:
        0.030711137 = product of:
          0.061422274 = sum of:
            0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 2355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061422274 = score(doc=2355,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 2355, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Increasingly, individuals use communication technologies such as e-mail, IMs, blogs, and cell phones to locate, learn about, and communicate with one another. Not much, however, is known about how individuals relate to various personal technologies, their preferences for each, or their extensional associations with them. Even less is known about the cultural differences in these preferences. The current study used the Galileo system of multidimensional scaling to systematically map the extensional associations with nine personal communication technologies across three cultures: U.S., Germany, and Singapore. Across the three cultures, the technologies closest to the self were similar, suggesting a universality of associations with certain technologies. In contrast, the technologies farther from the self were significantly different across cultures. Moreover, the magnitude of associations with each technology differed based on the extensional association or distance from the self. Also, and more importantly, the antecedents to these associations differed significantly across cultures, suggesting a stronger influence of cultural norms on personal-technology choice.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1761-1775
  8. Liu, X.; Kaza, S.; Zhang, P.; Chen, H.: Determining inventor status and its effect on knowledge diffusion : a study on nanotechnology literature from China, Russia, and India (2011) 0.01
    0.011081928 = product of:
      0.022163857 = sum of:
        0.022163857 = product of:
          0.044327714 = sum of:
            0.044327714 = weight(_text_:technology in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044327714 = score(doc=4468,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In an increasingly global research landscape, it is important to identify the most prolific researchers in various institutions and their influence on the diffusion of knowledge. Knowledge diffusion within institutions is influenced by not just the status of individual researchers but also the collaborative culture that determines status. There are various methods to measure individual status, but few studies have compared them or explored the possible effects of different cultures on the status measures. In this article, we examine knowledge diffusion within science and technology-oriented research organizations. Using social network analysis metrics to measure individual status in large-scale coauthorship networks, we studied an individual's impact on the recombination of knowledge to produce innovation in nanotechnology. Data from the most productive and high-impact institutions in China (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Russia (Russian Academy of Sciences), and India (Indian Institutes of Technology) were used. We found that boundary-spanning individuals influenced knowledge diffusion in all countries. However, our results also indicate that cultural and institutional differences may influence knowledge diffusion.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.6, S.1166-1176
  9. Chen, H.: Intelligence and security informatics : Introduction to the special topic issue (2005) 0.01
    0.010970548 = product of:
      0.021941096 = sum of:
        0.021941096 = product of:
          0.04388219 = sum of:
            0.04388219 = weight(_text_:technology in 3232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04388219 = score(doc=3232,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.28211737 = fieldWeight in 3232, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism The commitment of the scientific, engineering, and health communities to helping the United States and the world respond to security challenges became evident after September 11, 2001. The U.S. National Research Council's report an "Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism," (National Research Council, 2002, p. 1) explains the context of such a new commitment: Terrorism is a serious threat to the Security of the United States and indeed the world. The vulnerability of societies to terrorist attacks results in part from the proliferation of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons of mass destruction, but it also is a consequence of the highly efficient and interconnected systems that we rely an for key services such as transportation, information, energy, and health care. The efficient functioning of these systems reflects great technological achievements of the past century, but interconnectedness within and across systems also means that infrastructures are vulnerable to local disruptions, which could lead to widespread or catastrophic failures. As terrorists seek to exploit these vulnerabilities, it is fitting that we harness the nation's exceptional scientific and technological capabilities to Counter terrorist threats. A committee of 24 of the leading scientific, engineering, medical, and policy experts in the United States conducted the study described in the report. Eight panels were separately appointed and asked to provide input to the committee. The panels included: (a) biological sciences, (b) chemical issues, (c) nuclear and radiological issues, (d) information technology, (e) transportation, (f) energy facilities, Cities, and fixed infrastructure, (g) behavioral, social, and institutional issues, and (h) systems analysis and systems engineering. The focus of the committee's work was to make the nation safer from emerging terrorist threats that sought to inflict catastrophic damage an the nation's people, its infrastructure, or its economy. The committee considered nine areas, each of which is discussed in a separate chapter in the report: nuclear and radiological materials, human and agricultural health systems, toxic chemicals and explosive materials, information technology, energy systems, transportation systems, Cities and fixed infrastructure, the response of people to terrorism, and complex and interdependent systems. The chapter an information technology (IT) is particularly relevant to this special issue. The report recommends that "a strategic long-term research and development agenda should be established to address three primary counterterrorismrelated areas in IT: information and network security, the IT needs of emergency responders, and information fusion and management" (National Research Council, 2002, pp. 11 -12). The MD in information and network security should include approaches and architectures for prevention, identification, and containment of cyber-intrusions and recovery from them. The R&D to address IT needs of emergency responders should include ensuring interoperability, maintaining and expanding communications capability during an emergency, communicating with the public during an emergency, and providing support for decision makers. The R&D in information fusion and management for the intelligence, law enforcement, and emergency response communities should include data mining, data integration, language technologies, and processing of image and audio data. Much of the research reported in this special issue is related to information fusion and management for homeland security.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.3, S.217-220
  10. Jiang, S.; Gao, Q.; Chen, H.; Roco, M.C.: ¬The roles of sharing, transfer, and public funding in nanotechnology knowledge-diffusion networks (2015) 0.01
    0.010858027 = product of:
      0.021716055 = sum of:
        0.021716055 = product of:
          0.04343211 = sum of:
            0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04343211 = score(doc=1823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding the knowledge-diffusion networks of patent inventors can help governments and businesses effectively use their investment to stimulate commercial science and technology development. Such inventor networks are usually large and complex. This study proposes a multidimensional network analysis framework that utilizes Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) to simultaneously model knowledge-sharing and knowledge-transfer processes, examine their interactions, and evaluate the impacts of network structures and public funding on knowledge-diffusion networks. Experiments are conducted on a longitudinal data set that covers 2 decades (1991-2010) of nanotechnology-related US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents. The results show that knowledge sharing and knowledge transfer are closely interrelated. High degree centrality or boundary inventors play significant roles in the network, and National Science Foundation (NSF) public funding positively affects knowledge sharing despite its small fraction in overall funding and upstream research topics.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.1017-1029
  11. Chung, W.; Chen, H.; Reid, E.: Business stakeholder analyzer : an experiment of classifying stakeholders on the Web (2009) 0.01
    0.009048356 = product of:
      0.018096711 = sum of:
        0.018096711 = product of:
          0.036193423 = sum of:
            0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036193423 = score(doc=2699,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As the Web is used increasingly to share and disseminate information, business analysts and managers are challenged to understand stakeholder relationships. Traditional stakeholder theories and frameworks employ a manual approach to analysis and do not scale up to accommodate the rapid growth of the Web. Unfortunately, existing business intelligence (BI) tools lack analysis capability, and research on BI systems is sparse. This research proposes a framework for designing BI systems to identify and to classify stakeholders on the Web, incorporating human knowledge and machine-learned information from Web pages. Based on the framework, we have developed a prototype called Business Stakeholder Analyzer (BSA) that helps managers and analysts to identify and to classify their stakeholders on the Web. Results from our experiment involving algorithm comparison, feature comparison, and a user study showed that the system achieved better within-class accuracies in widespread stakeholder types such as partner/sponsor/supplier and media/reviewer, and was more efficient than human classification. The student and practitioner subjects in our user study strongly agreed that such a system would save analysts' time and help to identify and classify stakeholders. This research contributes to a better understanding of how to integrate information technology with stakeholder theory, and enriches the knowledge base of BI system design.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.59-74
  12. Chau, M.; Wong, C.H.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, J.; Chen, H.: Evaluating the use of search engine development tools in IT education (2010) 0.01
    0.009048356 = product of:
      0.018096711 = sum of:
        0.018096711 = product of:
          0.036193423 = sum of:
            0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036193423 = score(doc=3325,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is important for education in computer science and information systems to keep up to date with the latest development in technology. With the rapid development of the Internet and the Web, many schools have included Internet-related technologies, such as Web search engines and e-commerce, as part of their curricula. Previous research has shown that it is effective to use search engine development tools to facilitate students' learning. However, the effectiveness of these tools in the classroom has not been evaluated. In this article, we review the design of three search engine development tools, SpidersRUs, Greenstone, and Alkaline, followed by an evaluation study that compared the three tools in the classroom. In the study, 33 students were divided into 13 groups and each group used the three tools to develop three independent search engines in a class project. Our evaluation results showed that SpidersRUs performed better than the two other tools in overall satisfaction and the level of knowledge gained in their learning experience when using the tools for a class project on Internet applications development.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.288-299
  13. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.3, S.260-273
  14. Schumaker, R.P.; Chen, H.: Evaluating a news-aware quantitative trader : the effect of momentum and contrarian stock selection strategies (2008) 0.01
    0.008957415 = product of:
      0.01791483 = sum of:
        0.01791483 = product of:
          0.03582966 = sum of:
            0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03582966 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.2, S.247-255
  15. Carmel, E.; Crawford, S.; Chen, H.: Browsing in hypertext : a cognitive study (1992) 0.01
    0.008844686 = product of:
      0.017689371 = sum of:
        0.017689371 = product of:
          0.035378743 = sum of:
            0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 7469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035378743 = score(doc=7469,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7469, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7469)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. 22(1992) no.5, S.865-884
  16. Zhu, B.; Chen, H.: Information visualization (2004) 0.01
    0.00775735 = product of:
      0.0155147 = sum of:
        0.0155147 = product of:
          0.0310294 = sum of:
            0.0310294 = weight(_text_:technology in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0310294 = score(doc=4276,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19948712 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Advanced technology has resulted in the generation of about one million terabytes of information every year. Ninety-reine percent of this is available in digital format (Keim, 2001). More information will be generated in the next three years than was created during all of previous human history (Keim, 2001). Collecting information is no longer a problem, but extracting value from information collections has become progressively more difficult. Various search engines have been developed to make it easier to locate information of interest, but these work well only for a person who has a specific goal and who understands what and how information is stored. This usually is not the Gase. Visualization was commonly thought of in terms of representing human mental processes (MacEachren, 1991; Miller, 1984). The concept is now associated with the amplification of these mental processes (Card, Mackinlay, & Shneiderman, 1999). Human eyes can process visual cues rapidly, whereas advanced information analysis techniques transform the computer into a powerful means of managing digitized information. Visualization offers a link between these two potent systems, the human eye and the computer (Gershon, Eick, & Card, 1998), helping to identify patterns and to extract insights from large amounts of information. The identification of patterns is important because it may lead to a scientific discovery, an interpretation of clues to solve a crime, the prediction of catastrophic weather, a successful financial investment, or a better understanding of human behavior in a computermediated environment. Visualization technology shows considerable promise for increasing the value of large-scale collections of information, as evidenced by several commercial applications of TreeMap (e.g., http://www.smartmoney.com) and Hyperbolic tree (e.g., http://www.inxight.com) to visualize large-scale hierarchical structures. Although the proliferation of visualization technologies dates from the 1990s where sophisticated hardware and software made increasingly faster generation of graphical objects possible, the role of visual aids in facilitating the construction of mental images has a long history. Visualization has been used to communicate ideas, to monitor trends implicit in data, and to explore large volumes of data for hypothesis generation. Imagine traveling to a strange place without a map, having to memorize physical and chemical properties of an element without Mendeleyev's periodic table, trying to understand the stock market without statistical diagrams, or browsing a collection of documents without interactive visual aids. A collection of information can lose its value simply because of the effort required for exhaustive exploration. Such frustrations can be overcome by visualization.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.139-177
  17. Chen, H.: Introduction to the JASIST special topic section on Web retrieval and mining : A machine learning perspective (2003) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 1610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=1610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.621-624
  18. Chen, H.; Chau, M.: Web mining : machine learning for Web applications (2003) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.289-330
  19. Schroeder, J.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; Chau, M.: Automated criminal link analysis based on domain knowledge (2007) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.842-855
  20. Huang, Z.; Chung, Z.W.; Chen, H.: ¬A graph model for e-commerce recommender systems (2004) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.3, S.259-274