Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.04
    0.036582813 = product of:
      0.073165625 = sum of:
        0.073165625 = sum of:
          0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030711137 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042454492 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, Computer Science (CS) classifications are inconsistent in taxonomy strategies. t is necessary to develop CS taxonomy research to combine its historical perspective, its current knowledge and its predicted future trends - including all breakthroughs in information and communication technology. In this paper we have analyzed the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) by means of visualization maps. The important achievement of current work is an effective visualization of classified documents from the ACM Digital Library. From the technical point of view, the innovation lies in the parallel use of analysis units: (sub)classes and keywords as well as a spherical 3D information surface. We have compared both the thematic and semantic maps of classified documents and results presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the proposed new method is used for content-related evaluation of the original scheme. Summing up: we improved an original ACM classification in the Computer Science domain by means of visualization.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  2. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.359-377
  3. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.03
    0.030485678 = product of:
      0.060971357 = sum of:
        0.060971357 = sum of:
          0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025592614 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1428-1445
  4. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.02
    0.018291406 = product of:
      0.036582813 = sum of:
        0.036582813 = sum of:
          0.015355568 = weight(_text_:technology in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015355568 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.09872051 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.021227246 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021227246 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21700620-surprisingly-simple-test-check-research-papers-errors-come-again.
  5. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02
    0.017689371 = product of:
      0.035378743 = sum of:
        0.035378743 = product of:
          0.070757486 = sum of:
            0.070757486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070757486 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  6. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.02
    0.017689371 = product of:
      0.035378743 = sum of:
        0.035378743 = product of:
          0.070757486 = sum of:
            0.070757486 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070757486 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  7. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.02
    0.01500993 = product of:
      0.03001986 = sum of:
        0.03001986 = product of:
          0.06003972 = sum of:
            0.06003972 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06003972 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  8. Yan, B.; Luo, J.: Filtering patent maps for visualization of diversification paths of inventors and organizations (2017) 0.01
    0.012796307 = product of:
      0.025592614 = sum of:
        0.025592614 = product of:
          0.051185228 = sum of:
            0.051185228 = weight(_text_:technology in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051185228 = score(doc=3651,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the information science literature, recent studies have used patent databases and patent classification information to construct network maps of patent technology classes. In such a patent technology map, almost all pairs of technology classes are connected, whereas most of the connections between them are extremely weak. This observation suggests the possibility of filtering the patent network map by removing weak links. However, removing links may reduce the explanatory power of the network on inventor or organization diversification. The network links may explain the patent portfolio diversification paths of inventors and inventing organizations. We measure the diversification explanatory power of the patent network map, and present a method to objectively choose an optimal tradeoff between explanatory power and removing weak links. We show that this method can remove a degree of arbitrariness compared with previous filtering methods based on arbitrary thresholds, and also identify previous filtering methods that created filters outside the optimal tradeoff. The filtered map aims to aid in network visualization analyses of the technological diversification of inventors, organizations, and other innovation agents, and potential foresight analysis. Such applications to a prolific inventor (Leonard Forbes) and company (Google) are demonstrated.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.6, S.1551-1563
  9. Ross, A.: Screen-based information design : Eforms (2000) 0.01
    0.012667698 = product of:
      0.025335396 = sum of:
        0.025335396 = product of:
          0.05067079 = sum of:
            0.05067079 = weight(_text_:technology in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05067079 = score(doc=712,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study surveys and delineates the processes involved in screen-based information design. This is specifically in relation to the creation of electronic forms and from this offers a guide to their production. The study also examines the design and technological issues associated with the transfer, or translation, of the printed form to the computer screen. How an Eform might be made more visually engaging without detracting from the information relevant to the form's navigation and completion. Also, the interaction between technology and (document) structure where technology can eliminate or reduce traditional structural problems through the application of non-linear strategies. It reviews the potential solutions of incorporating improved functionality through interactivity.
  10. Trunk, D.: Semantische Netze in Informationssystemen : Verbesserung der Suche durch Interaktion und Visualisierung (2005) 0.01
    0.01238256 = product of:
      0.02476512 = sum of:
        0.02476512 = product of:
          0.04953024 = sum of:
            0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04953024 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.2007 18:22:41
  11. Rafols, I.; Porter, A.L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Science overlay maps : a new tool for research policy and library management (2010) 0.01
    0.010858027 = product of:
      0.021716055 = sum of:
        0.021716055 = product of:
          0.04343211 = sum of:
            0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 3987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04343211 = score(doc=3987,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 3987, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a novel approach to visually locate bodies of research within the sciences, both at each moment of time and dynamically. This article describes how this approach fits with other efforts to locally and globally map scientific outputs. We then show how these science overlay maps help benchmarking, explore collaborations, and track temporal changes, using examples of universities, corporations, funding agencies, and research topics. We address their conditions of application and discuss advantages, downsides, and limitations. Overlay maps especially help investigate the increasing number of scientific developments and organizations that do not fit within traditional disciplinary categories. We make these tools available online to enable researchers to explore the ongoing sociocognitive transformations of science and technology systems.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.9, S.1871-1887
  12. Su, H.-N.: Visualization of global science and technology policy research structure (2012) 0.01
    0.010858027 = product of:
      0.021716055 = sum of:
        0.021716055 = product of:
          0.04343211 = sum of:
            0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 4969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04343211 = score(doc=4969,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 4969, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.242-255
  13. Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007) 0.01
    0.010613623 = product of:
      0.021227246 = sum of:
        0.021227246 = product of:
          0.042454492 = sum of:
            0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042454492 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  14. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Handbuch : Effektiv informieren und kommunizieren mit Multimedia (2001) 0.01
    0.010613623 = product of:
      0.021227246 = sum of:
        0.021227246 = product of:
          0.042454492 = sum of:
            0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042454492 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:35:21
  15. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.01
    0.010613623 = product of:
      0.021227246 = sum of:
        0.021227246 = product of:
          0.042454492 = sum of:
            0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042454492 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  16. Miller, C.: Virtual reality and online databases : will "look and feel" literally mean "look" and "feel"? (1992) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 2413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=2413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The first of two articles discusses virtual reality (VR) and online databases; the second one reports on an interview with Thomas A. Furness III, who defines VR and explains work at the Human Interface Technology Laboratory (HIT). Sidebars contain a glossary of VR terms and a conversation with Toni Emerson, the HIT lab's librarian.
  17. Pfeffer, M.; Eckert, K.; Stuckenschmidt, H.: Visual analysis of classification systems and library collections (2008) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : proceedings of the 12th European conference, ECDL '08, Aarhus, Denmark
  18. Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools : review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=4486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1382-1402
  19. Representation in scientific practice revisited (2014) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=3543,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Representation in Scientific Practice, published by the MIT Press in 1990, helped coalesce a long-standing interest in scientific visualization among historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science and remains a touchstone for current investigations in science and technology studies. This volume revisits the topic, taking into account both the changing conceptual landscape of STS and the emergence of new imaging technologies in scientific practice. It offers cutting-edge research on a broad array of fields that study information as well as short reflections on the evolution of the field by leading scholars, including some of the contributors to the 1990 volume. The essays consider the ways in which viewing experiences are crafted in the digital era; the embodied nature of work with digital technologies; the constitutive role of materials and technologies -- from chalkboards to brain scans -- in the production of new scientific knowledge; the metaphors and images mobilized by communities of practice; and the status and significance of scientific imagery in professional and popular culture. ContributorsMorana Alac, Michael Barany, Anne Beaulieu, Annamaria Carusi, Catelijne Coopmans, Lorraine Daston, Sarah de Rijcke, Joseph Dumit, Emma Frow, Yann Giraud, Aud Sissel Hoel, Martin Kemp, Bruno Latour, John Law, Michael Lynch, Donald MacKenzie, Cyrus Mody, Natasha Myers, Rachel Prentice, Arie Rip, Martin Ruivenkamp, Lucy Suchman, Janet Vertesi, Steve Woolgar
    LCSH
    Technology / Methodology
    Series
    Inside technology
    Subject
    Technology / Methodology
  20. Parsons, P.; Sedig, K.: Adjustable properties of visual representations : improving the quality of human-information interaction (2014) 0.01
    0.009048356 = product of:
      0.018096711 = sum of:
        0.018096711 = product of:
          0.036193423 = sum of:
            0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 1214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036193423 = score(doc=1214,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 1214, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Complex cognitive activities, such as analytical reasoning, problem solving, and sense making, are often performed through the mediation of interactive computational tools. Examples include visual analytics, decision support, and educational tools. Through interaction with visual representations of information at the visual interface of these tools, a joint, coordinated cognitive system is formed. This partnership results in a number of relational properties-those depending on both humans and tools-that researchers and designers must be aware of if such tools are to effectively support the performance of complex cognitive activities. This article presents 10 properties of interactive visual representations that are essential and relational and whose values can be adjusted through interaction. By adjusting the values of these properties, better coordination between humans and tools can be effected, leading to higher quality performance of complex cognitive activities. This article examines how the values of these properties affect cognitive processing and visual reasoning and demonstrates the necessity of making their values adjustable-all of which is situated within a broader theoretical framework concerned with human-information interaction in complex cognitive activities. This framework can facilitate systematic research, design, and evaluation in numerous fields including information visualization, health informatics, visual analytics, and educational technology.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.455-482

Years

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 4
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 58
  • m 7
  • el 6
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…