Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Park, J.-r."
  1. Park, J.-r.: Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer-mediated communication : part 2: an application of the theoretical framework (2008) 0.03
    0.031401347 = product of:
      0.12560539 = sum of:
        0.12560539 = weight(_text_:communication in 2684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12560539 = score(doc=2684,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.6310947 = fieldWeight in 2684, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2684)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of sociointerpersonal communication patterns among discourse participants is essential to understand the manifestation of and the interpersonal-communication features realized in online social interaction. The linguistic politeness theory provides an effective framework for such an analysis of sociointerpersonal communication features employed by online language users to maintain and enhance their public self-image, or face. The qualitative data analysis of this study, drawn from the real-time, online discussions of K-12 students, makes evident that interpersonal-communication features appear in the form of politeness tactics. The results of the study show that there is decreased use of deferential linguistic forms; on the contrary, a variety of verbal and nonverbal devices that denote positive politeness and bald-on-record (i.e., direct speech acts) frequently occur. The commonality of positive politeness and bald-on-record lies in the fact that both tactics are grounded in the nature of the close interpersonal relationships between participants. Such a communication pattern in the real-time, online discourse of K-12 students signifies that cognitive assessment of sociointerpersonal and contextual variables undertaken by speech participants underlies the realization of linguistic politeness. Employment of such politeness tactics indicates that effective and fully realized interpersonal communication plays a vital role in the development of online social interaction.
  2. Park, J.-r.: Linguistic politeness and face-work in computer-mediated communication : part 1: a theoretical framework (2008) 0.03
    0.028484624 = product of:
      0.113938496 = sum of:
        0.113938496 = weight(_text_:communication in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113938496 = score(doc=2382,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Our daily social interaction is anchored in interpersonal discourse; accordingly, the phenomenon of linguistic politeness is prevalent in daily social interaction. Such linguistic behavior underscores the fact that linguistic politeness is a critical component of human communication. Speech participants utilize linguistic politeness to avoid and reduce social friction and enhance each other's face, or public self-image, during social interaction. It is face-work that underlies the interpersonal function of language use and encompasses all verbal and nonverbal realizations that bring forth one's positive social value, namely, face. Face-work is founded in and built into dynamic social relations; these social and cultural relations and context directly affect the enactment of face-work. Analysis and a subsequent understanding of sociointerpersonal communication are critical to the fostering of successful interaction and collaboration. Linguistic politeness theory is well positioned to provide a framework for an analysis of social interaction and interpersonal variables among discourse participants inasmuch as it is applicable not only to face-to-face social interactions but also to those interactions undertaken through online communication.
  3. Park, J.-r.: Evolution of concept networks and implications for knowledge representation (2007) 0.02
    0.021362748 = product of:
      0.08545099 = sum of:
        0.08545099 = product of:
          0.17090198 = sum of:
            0.17090198 = weight(_text_:networks in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17090198 = score(doc=847,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.7838809 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present descriptive characteristics of the historical development of concept networks. The linguistic principles, mechanisms and motivations behind the evolution of concept networks are discussed. Implications emanating from the idea of the historical development of concept networks are discussed in relation to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Design/methodology/approach - Natural language data including both speech and text are analyzed by examining discourse contexts in which a linguistic element such as a polysemy or homonym occurs. Linguistic literature on the historical development of concept networks is reviewed and analyzed. Findings - Semantic sense relations in concept networks can be captured in a systematic and regular manner. The mechanism and impetus behind the process of concept network development suggest that semantic senses in concept networks are closely intertwined with pragmatic contexts and discourse structure. The interrelation and permeability of the semantic senses of concept networks are captured on a continuum scale based on three linguistic parameters: concrete shared semantic sense; discourse and text structure; and contextualized pragmatic information. Research limitations/implications - Research findings signify the critical need for linking discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Originality/value - The idea of linguistic characteristics, principles, motivation and mechanisms underlying the evolution of concept networks provides theoretical ground for developing a model for integrating knowledge representation and organization schemes with discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information.
  4. Park, J.-r.: Semantic interoperability and metadata quality : an analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections (2006) 0.01
    0.0071209157 = product of:
      0.028483663 = sum of:
        0.028483663 = product of:
          0.056967326 = sum of:
            0.056967326 = weight(_text_:networks in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056967326 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is a current assessment of the status of metadata creation and mapping between catalogerdefined field names and Dublin Core (DC) metadata elements across three digital image collections. The metadata elements that evince the most frequently inaccurate, inconsistent and incomplete DC metadata application are identified. As well, the most frequently occurring locally added metadata elements and associated pattern development are examined. For this, a randomly collected sample of 659 metadata item records from three digital image collections is analyzed. Implications and issues drawn from the evaluation of the current status of metadata creation and mapping are also discussed in relation to the issue of semantic interoperability of concept representation across digital image collections. The findings of the study suggest that conceptual ambiguities and semantic overlaps inherent among some DC metadata elements hinder semantic interoperability. The DC metadata scheme needs to be refined in order to disambiguate semantic relations of certain DC metadata elements that present semantic overlaps and conceptual ambiguities between element names and their corresponding definitions. The findings of the study also suggest that the development of mediation mechanisms such as concept networks that facilitate the metadata creation and mapping process are critically needed for enhancing metadata quality.
  5. Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007) 0.01
    0.006245084 = product of:
      0.024980336 = sum of:
        0.024980336 = product of:
          0.049960673 = sum of:
            0.049960673 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049960673 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.00
    0.004683813 = product of:
      0.018735252 = sum of:
        0.018735252 = product of:
          0.037470505 = sum of:
            0.037470505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037470505 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24