-
Benson, E.; Dunn, L.R.: ¬The 'Routledge Encyclopedia' project : indexing tools and management techniques for large documents (1993)
0.09
0.08912055 = product of:
0.1782411 = sum of:
0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 6346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01841403 = score(doc=6346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 6346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6346)
0.15982707 = weight(_text_:computing in 6346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15982707 = score(doc=6346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.6111468 = fieldWeight in 6346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6346)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Literary and linguistic computing. 8(1993) no.2, S.91-94
-
Menk, B.: Indexing a local newspaper on the Web (1999)
0.06
0.06393083 = product of:
0.25572333 = sum of:
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=511,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 511, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=511)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library computing. 18(1999) no.2, S.151-159
-
Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000)
0.06
0.055760533 = product of:
0.111521065 = sum of:
0.015624823 = weight(_text_:for in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624823 = score(doc=214,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.095896244 = weight(_text_:computing in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095896244 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.36668807 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The explosion in personal computing and in computer technology has brought a wealth of opportunities for indexers. Annually, traditional publishers produce numerous books on computer topics, while software and hardware companies constantly issue new products with manuals that require indexes. Indexers can find work with these high-technology publishers or can subcontract with technical documentation firms or with freelance technical writers. The range of audiences for computer-related documents is wide and varied, as is the range of topics. These documents are not limited to end-user software manuals, but include programming, Internet, and networking topics among others. Hardware companies, in addition to computer manufacturers, are also a good potential source of clients. Many hardware products have a sizeable software component that requires its own set of indexed manuals. There are advantages and disadvantages to working with high-technology companies (and their contractors) vs. working with traditional publishers. It is simply a matter of personal taste which type of client you prefer. I have truly enjoyed working with both.
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.04
0.035309397 = product of:
0.07061879 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.04
0.035309397 = product of:
0.07061879 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.04
0.035309397 = product of:
0.07061879 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.03
0.025483366 = product of:
0.050966732 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.036235508 = product of:
0.072471015 = sum of:
0.072471015 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072471015 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.02
0.024099609 = product of:
0.048199218 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=749,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.02
0.017654698 = product of:
0.035309397 = sum of:
0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012889821 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Automated support to indexing forms a continuum from computer support to clerical activities, quality control, intellectual activities and to full automatic indexing. Describes the current indexing environment and examines the need for automated support. Reports on case studies of various indexing services which are at different stages along the continuum. Describes academic and corporate research projects and commercial indexing software. Examines the future of related technologies and offers advice on how to get started on the continuum
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.01
0.014517335 = product of:
0.02903467 = sum of:
0.013020686 = weight(_text_:for in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013020686 = score(doc=5775,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.016013984 = product of:
0.032027967 = sum of:
0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032027967 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.011209788 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = product of:
0.0896783 = sum of:
0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0896783 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
