Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.06
    0.055601697 = product of:
      0.092669494 = sum of:
        0.04183183 = weight(_text_:j in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04183183 = score(doc=5089,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.32509267 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.01679047 = weight(_text_:u in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01679047 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.034047194 = weight(_text_:b in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034047194 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23730135 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  2. Hetzler, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships (2002) 0.03
    0.03472197 = product of:
      0.08680493 = sum of:
        0.047490623 = weight(_text_:u in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047490623 = score(doc=1189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
        0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039314307 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Rahmstorf, G.: Wege zur Ontologie (2006) 0.03
    0.026419431 = product of:
      0.06604858 = sum of:
        0.0271375 = weight(_text_:u in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0271375 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.038911078 = weight(_text_:b in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911078 = score(doc=5868,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.27120155 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologie ist in der Philosophie die Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage, welche Arten von Gegenständen existieren und in welcher Weise sie existieren. Ein zentrales Thema ist z. B., ob es geistige Gegenstände, z. B. Gedanken, Ideen, Begriffe, Vorstellungen u. a. gibt und wie ihre Existenz begründet wird. Neuerdings wird mit dem Wort "Ontologie" eine andere, etwas konkretere Bedeutung verbunden. Unter einer Ontologie werden die allgemeinsten Begriffe eines Fachgebiets verstanden. So gehören zur Ontologie des Organischen u. a. "Pflanze", "Tier" und "Mensch". Wenn der Begriff "Tier" schon gegeben ist, lassen sich daraus andere Begriffe, z. B. "Wirbeltier", "Reptil", "Säugetier" usw. spezifizierend durch Angabe weiterer Merkmale bilden. Außerdem können Begriffsbeziehungen und andere formale Mittel zu Ontologien gehören. Ontologie ist danach die Methode, durch die die Begriffswelt eines Sachgebiets bestimmt wird, und insbesondere das Ergebnis dieser Methode: die Struktur aus Begriffen höchster Allgemeinheit, die mit dieser Methode erstellt wird. Das Wort "Ontologie" kann jedoch unterschiedlich verstanden wird. Es bezeichnet auch die Gesamtheit aller Begriffe, die zum Untersuchungsgegenstand gehören. Die Ontologie umfasst dann alles, was an Begriffen aus einer bestimmten Aufgabenstellung betrachtet bzw. erarbeitet wird. Zu einer Ontologie der Elektronik würden alle Begriffe dieses Gebietes gehören. Mit einem so weit gefassten Verständnis des Wortes "Ontologie" wird die Fokussierung auf die Kategorien größter Allgemeinheit der hierarchisch gegliederten Begriffswelt aufgegeben. Außerdem würde eine so verstandene Ontologie mit der Tatsache der Unabgrenzbarkeit des Wortschatzes belastet werden. Komposita können im Deutschen quasi unbegrenzt erweitert werden. Es gibt nicht nur den Kamin und den Kaminfeger, sondern auch die Kaminfegerarbeitskleidungsreinigungsfirma und dergleichen mehr. Komposita sind unverzichtbar. Ihre maximale Länge ist nicht festgelegt. Die Benennungen für Stoffe in der Chemie zeigen, dass man in dieser Fachsprache durchaus problemlos mit sehr langen Zusammensetzungen kommuniziert. Aber die Ontologen werden nicht daran interessiert sein, ihre Untersuchungen bis in die Tiefen aller Fachgebiete auszudehnen. Kurzum "Ontologie" sollte sich auf Begriffe höchster Allgemeinheit beziehen. Das entspricht der engeren Bedeutung des Wortes "Ontologie". Die Unterbegriffe dieser Top-Level-Begriffe können natürlich ebenfalls für Ontologen von Interesse sein, weil sie zeigen, welches Begriffsbildungspotenzial die verschiedenen Top-Level-Begriffe haben. Der Schwerpunkt des Interesses der Ontologen sollte aber auf den Begriffen liegen, die nicht weiter zurückführbar sind.
  4. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.02
    0.020827217 = product of:
      0.05206804 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
    Editor
    Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  5. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.02
    0.015081236 = product of:
      0.03770309 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
        0.0137167005 = product of:
          0.027433401 = sum of:
            0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027433401 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  6. Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002) 0.01
    0.008141249 = product of:
      0.040706247 = sum of:
        0.040706247 = weight(_text_:u in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040706247 = score(doc=1201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Hovy, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies (2002) 0.01
    0.008141249 = product of:
      0.040706247 = sum of:
        0.040706247 = weight(_text_:u in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040706247 = score(doc=2178,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.01
    0.0079426905 = product of:
      0.03971345 = sum of:
        0.03971345 = weight(_text_:b in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03971345 = score(doc=3461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
  9. Harras, G.: Concepts in linguistics : concepts in natural language (2000) 0.01
    0.007862861 = product of:
      0.039314307 = sum of:
        0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039314307 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  10. Cruse, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties (2002) 0.01
    0.007675644 = product of:
      0.03837822 = sum of:
        0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 1186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03837822 = score(doc=1186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1186)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  11. Green, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics (2002) 0.01
    0.007675644 = product of:
      0.03837822 = sum of:
        0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03837822 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  12. Thellefsen, M.: ¬The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation (2006) 0.01
    0.007675644 = product of:
      0.03837822 = sum of:
        0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03837822 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  13. Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000) 0.01
    0.0067395954 = product of:
      0.033697978 = sum of:
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  14. Rahmstorf, G.: Wortmodell und Begriffssprache als Basis des semantischen Retrievals (2000) 0.01
    0.006716188 = product of:
      0.03358094 = sum of:
        0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03358094 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  15. Fellbaum, C.: On the semantics of troponymy (2002) 0.01
    0.006716188 = product of:
      0.03358094 = sum of:
        0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03358094 = score(doc=1191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  16. Guarino, N.; Welty, C.: Identity and subsumption (2002) 0.01
    0.006716188 = product of:
      0.03358094 = sum of:
        0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03358094 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  17. Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002) 0.01
    0.0057567325 = product of:
      0.028783662 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  18. Khoo, C.; Myaeng, S.H.: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction (2002) 0.01
    0.0057567325 = product of:
      0.028783662 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  19. Pribbenow, S.: Meronymic relationships : from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations (2002) 0.01
    0.0057567325 = product of:
      0.028783662 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
  20. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.01
    0.0057567325 = product of:
      0.028783662 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng