Search (251 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Advances in classification research. Vol.10 : Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, held at the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting Nov 1-5, 1999, Washington (2001) 0.07
    0.066841446 = product of:
      0.08355181 = sum of:
        0.0029257927 = product of:
          0.026332134 = sum of:
            0.026332134 = weight(_text_:p in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026332134 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.002708061 = weight(_text_:a in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002708061 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
        0.048834264 = weight(_text_:u in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048834264 = score(doc=1586,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.48537666 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
        0.029083695 = weight(_text_:j in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029083695 = score(doc=1586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DAVENPORT, E.: Implicit orders: documentary genres and organizational practice; ANDERSEN, J. u. F.S. CHRISTENSEN: Wittgenstein and indexing theory; OLSON, H.A.: Cultural discourses of classification: indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Dürkheim, and Foucault; FRÂNCU, V.: A universal classification system going through changes; JACOB, E.K. u. U. PRISS: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources; BROOKS, T.A.: Relevance auras: macro patterns and micro scatter; RUIZ, M.E. u. SRINIVASAN, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization; WEEDMAN, J.: Local practice and the growth of knowledge: decisions in subject access to digitized images
    Editor
    Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
  2. Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994) 0.05
    0.054807544 = product of:
      0.06850943 = sum of:
        0.0029257927 = product of:
          0.026332134 = sum of:
            0.026332134 = weight(_text_:p in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026332134 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.008124183 = weight(_text_:a in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008124183 = score(doc=8863,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
        0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021839347 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
        0.035620105 = weight(_text_:j in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035620105 = score(doc=8863,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.3648396 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
    Footnote
    Reprint von: Rev. Int. Doc. 32(1965) no.4, S.136-144; dto. als FID/CR report no.4 u. im Buch des Verf.: Towards a theory for UDC. London: Bingley 1969, S.119-148
    Type
    a
  3. Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.05
    0.045112688 = product of:
      0.07518781 = sum of:
        0.0045134346 = weight(_text_:a in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045134346 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
        0.036398914 = weight(_text_:u in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036398914 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
        0.03427546 = weight(_text_:j in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03427546 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
    Type
    a
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.04
    0.042914692 = product of:
      0.071524486 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
        0.041130554 = weight(_text_:j in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041130554 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
        0.024977813 = product of:
          0.049955625 = sum of:
            0.049955625 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049955625 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Type
    a
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.04
    0.042914692 = product of:
      0.071524486 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
        0.041130554 = weight(_text_:j in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041130554 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
        0.024977813 = product of:
          0.049955625 = sum of:
            0.049955625 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049955625 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Type
    a
  6. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.04
    0.036865976 = product of:
      0.06144329 = sum of:
        0.0036107479 = weight(_text_:a in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036107479 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
        0.041180667 = weight(_text_:u in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041180667 = score(doc=4339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
        0.016651876 = product of:
          0.033303753 = sum of:
            0.033303753 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033303753 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
    Source
    Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
    Type
    a
  7. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.03
    0.026625061 = product of:
      0.0443751 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=2072,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
        0.024417132 = weight(_text_:u in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024417132 = score(doc=2072,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.24268833 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
        0.014541848 = weight(_text_:j in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014541848 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14894515 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.03
    0.025925422 = product of:
      0.043209035 = sum of:
        0.0031594043 = weight(_text_:a in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031594043 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025479238 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.014570392 = product of:
          0.029140783 = sum of:
            0.029140783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029140783 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
    Type
    a
  9. Maltby, A.; Marcella, R.: Organizing knowledge : the need for system and unity (2000) 0.02
    0.02476119 = product of:
      0.061902978 = sum of:
        0.010944499 = weight(_text_:a in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010944499 = score(doc=181,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
        0.050958477 = weight(_text_:u in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050958477 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
    Type
    a
  10. Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000) 0.02
    0.023957849 = product of:
      0.05989462 = sum of:
        0.008936145 = weight(_text_:a in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008936145 = score(doc=3162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
        0.050958477 = weight(_text_:u in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050958477 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
    Type
    a
  11. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.02
    0.023373466 = product of:
      0.029216832 = sum of:
        0.0027584638 = product of:
          0.024826175 = sum of:
            0.024826175 = weight(_text_:p in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024826175 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.004422245 = weight(_text_:a in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004422245 = score(doc=2763,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.12482099 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
        0.013710184 = weight(_text_:j in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013710184 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
        0.008325938 = product of:
          0.016651876 = sum of:
            0.016651876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016651876 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
    Type
    a
  12. Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952) 0.02
    0.022768717 = product of:
      0.05692179 = sum of:
        0.008936145 = weight(_text_:a in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008936145 = score(doc=1655,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
        0.047985647 = weight(_text_:j in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047985647 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Fortsetzung von: J. Doc. 6(1950) S.83-99.
    Type
    a
  13. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.021747312 = product of:
      0.036245517 = sum of:
        0.0058515854 = product of:
          0.05266427 = sum of:
            0.05266427 = weight(_text_:p in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05266427 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
        0.024977813 = product of:
          0.049955625 = sum of:
            0.049955625 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049955625 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
    Source
    International classification. 7(1980) no.1, p.2-5
    Type
    a
  14. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.02
    0.020993905 = product of:
      0.03498984 = sum of:
        0.006382961 = weight(_text_:a in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006382961 = score(doc=2282,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
        0.018199457 = weight(_text_:u in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018199457 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
        0.010407423 = product of:
          0.020814845 = sum of:
            0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020814845 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  15. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬A brief introduction to facets in knowledge organization (2017) 0.02
    0.0205353 = product of:
      0.051338248 = sum of:
        0.0076595526 = weight(_text_:a in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076595526 = score(doc=1131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
        0.043678693 = weight(_text_:u in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043678693 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a
  16. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.02
    0.020109521 = product of:
      0.033515867 = sum of:
        0.005970713 = weight(_text_:a in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005970713 = score(doc=1778,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01713773 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.010407423 = product of:
          0.020814845 = sum of:
            0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020814845 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13
    Type
    a
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Facets for clustering and disambiguation : the domain discourse of facets in knowledge organization (2017) 0.02
    0.019637926 = product of:
      0.049094815 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
        0.043678693 = weight(_text_:u in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043678693 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a
  18. LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017) 0.02
    0.019637926 = product of:
      0.049094815 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
        0.043678693 = weight(_text_:u in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043678693 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a
  19. Satija, M.P.; Oh, D.-G.: ¬The DDC and the knowledge categories : Dewey did faceting without knowing it (2017) 0.02
    0.019637926 = product of:
      0.049094815 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
        0.043678693 = weight(_text_:u in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043678693 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a
  20. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 3: facets (2017) 0.02
    0.019637926 = product of:
      0.049094815 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
        0.043678693 = weight(_text_:u in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043678693 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 221
  • m 24
  • el 10
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • More… Less…