Search (722 results, page 1 of 37)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Vogt, T.: ¬Die Transformation des renommierten Informationsservices zbMATH zu einer Open Access-Plattform für die Mathematik steht vor dem Abschluss. (2020) 0.12
    0.11912736 = product of:
      0.7147642 = sum of:
        0.6931975 = sum of:
          0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049318835 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.29517606 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29517606 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34248218 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.34870264 = weight(_text_:bcr in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.34870264 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3722417 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.936764 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.021566676 = weight(_text_:und in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021566676 = score(doc=31,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Content
    "Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."
  2. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.10
    0.098741725 = product of:
      0.19748345 = sum of:
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017280413 = score(doc=3035,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016974952 = score(doc=3035,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017280413 = score(doc=3035,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.12543696 = sum of:
          0.08736767 = weight(_text_:communities in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08736767 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.46889755 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.038069297 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038069297 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.6, S.507-516
  3. Keates, S.: New developments in intellectual property rights : protection and access for electronic documents (1995) 0.10
    0.09556624 = product of:
      0.19113249 = sum of:
        0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008371122 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
        0.021412011 = weight(_text_:for in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021412011 = score(doc=4000,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
        0.011712181 = weight(_text_:the in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011712181 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21135174 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
        0.1312825 = weight(_text_:commission in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1312825 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.53766286 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
        0.006642501 = weight(_text_:of in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006642501 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
        0.011712181 = weight(_text_:the in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011712181 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21135174 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Examines 2 European Commission projects starting in Dec 95 aimed at managing access and protection for intellectual property. The Intellectual Multimedia Property Rights Model and Terminology for Universal References (IMPRIMATUR) project involves 16 partners with a network server in Italy. The Coordinating Project for Electronic Authors' Right Management Systems (COPEARMS) aims to develop the copyright in Transmitted Electronic Documents (CITED) work. Two other projects are also described: Copyright Ownership Protection in Computer Assisted Training (COPICAT) and MultiMedia Education System for Librarians Introducing Remote Interactive Processing of Electronic Documents (MURIEL)
    Source
    Information management report. 1995, Dec., S.14-16
  4. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.06
    0.064626426 = product of:
      0.15510343 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=3954,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=3954,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
        0.093773216 = weight(_text_:commission in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093773216 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38404492 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
        0.014233928 = weight(_text_:of in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014233928 = score(doc=3954,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=3954,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to bring together information on whether any evidence exists of a commercial conflict between the creation of digital archives at research institutions and by key subject centres of excellence, and the business of journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Relevant publications, including articles published in refereed books and journals, as well as informal commentaries on listservs, blogs and wikis, were analysed to determine whether there is any evidence of a commercial relationship. Findings - Most of the published comments are highly subjective and anecdotal - there is a significant emotional overtone to many of the views expressed. There is precious little hard evidence currently available to support or debunk the idea that a commercial conflict exists between repositories and journal subscriptions. The situation is made more difficult by the many technological, sociological and administrative changes that are taking place in parallel to the establishment of repositories. Practical implications - Separating the key drivers and their impact is a major strategic challenge facing all stakeholders in the scholarly communication industry in future. Research limitations/implications - This is an important area which requires close monitoring - the possible threat that the established journal publishing system could be eroded away by a new "free" scholarly information system needs attention. One significant study in this area is being undertaken by the PEER group, funded by the European Commission with hard evidence being collected by UCL's CIBER research group. The results from this impartial investigation will be very welcome. Originality/value - The paper shows that relationship between repositories and journal subscriptions is vague.
  5. Nobarany, S.; Booth, K.S.: Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2017) 0.06
    0.060752302 = product of:
      0.121504605 = sum of:
        0.012427893 = weight(_text_:information in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012427893 = score(doc=3533,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.018353151 = weight(_text_:for in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018353151 = score(doc=3533,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27831143 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018328644 = score(doc=3533,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.021303395 = weight(_text_:of in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021303395 = score(doc=3533,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018328644 = score(doc=3533,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.032762878 = product of:
          0.065525755 = sum of:
            0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065525755 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Design of peer-review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the concealment and transparency of information related to identities of the various stakeholders (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) involved in the peer-review process. Anonymity policies have been a subject of debate for several decades within scholarly communities. Because of widespread criticism of traditional peer-review processes, a variety of new peer-review processes have emerged that manage the trade-offs between disclosure and concealment of identities in different ways. Based on an analysis of policies and guidelines for authors and reviewers provided by publication venues, we developed a framework for understanding how disclosure and concealment of identities is managed. We discuss the appropriate role of information technology and computer support for the peer-review process within that framework.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.957-971
  6. Shen, W.; Stempfhuber, M.: Embedding discussion in online publications (2013) 0.05
    0.053614423 = product of:
      0.107228845 = sum of:
        0.008285262 = weight(_text_:information in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008285262 = score(doc=940,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.012235435 = weight(_text_:for in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012235435 = score(doc=940,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.18554096 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.020808373 = weight(_text_:the in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020808373 = score(doc=940,freq=58.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37549672 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
                58.0 = termFreq=58.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.014202263 = weight(_text_:of in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014202263 = score(doc=940,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25858206 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.020808373 = weight(_text_:the in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020808373 = score(doc=940,freq=58.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37549672 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
                58.0 = termFreq=58.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.030889137 = product of:
          0.061778273 = sum of:
            0.061778273 = weight(_text_:communities in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061778273 = score(doc=940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.33156064 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Grey Literature and Open Access publications have the potential to become the basis of new types of scientific publications, in which scientific discourse and collaboration can play a central role in the dissemination of knowledge, due to their machine-readable format and electronic availability. With advances in cyber science and e-(Social) Science, an increasing number of scientific publications are required to be shared with different group members or even within communities in virtual reading environments. However, the most often used format for publishing articles on the web is still the Adobe PDF format, which limits the extent to which readers of an article can interact with online content and within their browser environment. This not only separates the formal communication - the article itself - from the informal communication about a publication - the discussion about the article - but also fails to link the different threads of communications which might appear in parallel at different locations in the scientific community as a whole. Analysis of around 30 web sites where different ways for presenting formal and informal communications were conducted shows in the identification of several prototypes of media combinations which were then evaluated against human factor aspects (distance between related information, arrangement of related information etc). Based on this evaluation we concluded that at the time of analysis, no model exist for directly integrating formal and informal communication to a single media, allowing readers of publications to directly discuss within the publication, e.g. to extend the publication with their input directly at the paragraph they wanted to comment. Therefore, a new publishing medium is necessary to fulfil the gap between the formal and informal communication, facilitating and engaging academic readers' active participating in the online scientific discourse. We have developed an online discussion service, which allows interactive features for annotation directly available at the point in the publication to which the comment refers to. Besides the exchange of ideas and the stimulation of discourse across portals and communities we approach at the same time to create a new basis for research in scientific discourse, networking and collaboration. This is supported by linking from the individual article to other publications or information items in digital libraries.
  7. Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019) 0.05
    0.0522481 = product of:
      0.12539545 = sum of:
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=4627,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.021053577 = weight(_text_:the in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021053577 = score(doc=4627,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37992156 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.015003879 = weight(_text_:of in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015003879 = score(doc=4627,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.021053577 = weight(_text_:the in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021053577 = score(doc=4627,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37992156 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.05460479 = product of:
          0.10920958 = sum of:
            0.10920958 = weight(_text_:communities in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10920958 = score(doc=4627,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.5861219 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical/scientific soundness of the article. Design/methodology/approach Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution. Findings A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers' perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks. Originality/value This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.1, S.120-139
  8. Open initiatives : Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft (2012) 0.05
    0.05098339 = product of:
      0.10196678 = sum of:
        0.0067648874 = weight(_text_:information in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067648874 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.03409991 = weight(_text_:und in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03409991 = score(doc=567,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.047902092 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047902092 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29195932 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.0054718526 = weight(_text_:for in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054718526 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.08297644 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.0038640175 = weight(_text_:the in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038640175 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.06972799 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
        0.0038640175 = weight(_text_:the in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038640175 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.06972799 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Initiativen, die Transparenz, offenen und möglichst einfachen Zugang zu Informationen, etwa in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung fordern und herstellen, gewinnen rasant an Bedeutung und beginnen sich immer weiter zu differenzieren. Die Forderungen reichen von freiem (im Sinne von kostenlosem) Zugang zu Informationen bis hin zu offenem Zugang analog den Prinzipien der Open Source Community. Manche Initiativen und Phänomene fokussieren stärker auf Transparenz als auf Offenheit, wie z.B. die Whistleblower-Plattform Wikileaks, während wiederum andere (z.B. Open Government oder Open Access zu Forschungsdaten) die Forderungen nach Transparenz und Offenheit kombinieren oder sich an der Bereitstellung nicht-proprietärer Informationen versuchen (wie das Geodaten-Projekt OpenStreetMap oder die Open Metrics Konzepte im Wissenschaftskontext). Zwölf Autorinnen und Autoren aus Open Data Projekten und aus den Bereichen Open Access, Open Science, Journalismus und Recht beschreiben und analysieren die besagten und andere Open Initiatives, diskutieren deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Grenzen sowie radikale Offenheitskonzepte wie WikiLeaks und Anonymous.
    BK
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Classification
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Content
    Inhalt: Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke: Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge - Ulrich Herb Offener Zugang zu Forschungsdaten - Jens Klump Wissenschaft zum Mitmachen, Wissenschaft als Prozess: Offene Wissenschaft - Daniel Mietchen Open Access hinter verschlossenen Türen oder wie sich Open Access im und mit dem Entwicklungsdiskurs arrangiert - Jutta Haider The European sciences: How "open" are they for women? - Terje Tüür-Fröhlich Wie erwirbt der Mensch Wissen, wie wendet er es an und wie behandelt das Recht diesen Vorgang? - Eckhard Höjfner Collateral Copyright: Modularisierte Urheberrechtsfreigaben für die Wissenschaft - John Hendrik Weitzmann Open Data - Am Beispiel von Informationen des öffentlichen Sektors - Nils Barnickel, Jens Kiessmann Offene Geodäten durch OpenStreetMap - Roland Ramthun Wikileaks und das Ideal der Öffentlichkeit - Christiane Schulzki-Haddouti Open Collectivity - Carolin Wiedemann
  9. Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998) 0.05
    0.050118335 = product of:
      0.10023667 = sum of:
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021858184 = score(doc=3686,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016974952 = score(doc=3686,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021858184 = score(doc=3686,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.019034648 = product of:
          0.038069297 = sum of:
            0.038069297 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038069297 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library's Initiatives for Access programme (1993-) aims to identify the impact and value of digital and networking technologies on the Library's collections and services. Describes the projects: the Electronic Beowulf, digitisation of ageing microfilm, digital photographic images, and use of the Excalibur retrieval software. Examines the ways in which the issues of preparation, scanning, and storage have been tackled, and problems raised by use of recognition technologies and compression
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:00:52
    Source
    Information management and technology. 31(1998) no.2, S.77-81
  10. Rees, F.: Electronic journals on SuperJANET (1994) 0.05
    0.049657516 = product of:
      0.09931503 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.020446459 = weight(_text_:the in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020446459 = score(doc=794,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36896583 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.021471804 = weight(_text_:of in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021471804 = score(doc=794,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
        0.020446459 = weight(_text_:the in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020446459 = score(doc=794,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36896583 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a pilot project at the UK Institute of Physics to investigate the potential use of Super JANET as a vehicle for the 'true' electronic journal. Aspects being studied are: identification of the articles required, by browsing existing collections of material; manipulation of the sub-article elements such as figures, texts and citations, both within a given article and between articles and other services; and exploration of the transfer and display of colour images and half-tones. The types of software under investigation include: relational databases with text-handling capabilities; free-text databases; presentation software; hypertext and browsing software; multimedia approaches; and conversion tools
    Source
    Information management report. 1994, April, S.9-10
  11. Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003) 0.05
    0.048287906 = product of:
      0.09657581 = sum of:
        0.016044341 = weight(_text_:information in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016044341 = score(doc=1871,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016415559 = score(doc=1871,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=1871,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.015063776 = weight(_text_:of in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015063776 = score(doc=1871,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=1871,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.014275986 = product of:
          0.028551972 = sum of:
            0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028551972 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Chemical information sciences-ranging from subjectspecific bibliometrics to sophisticated theoretical systems for modeling structures and reactions-have historically led in developing new technologies. Hundreds of papers are published or presented at conferences annually in this discipline. One of the more significant conferences at which important research has historically been presented is the Tri-Society Symposium an Chemical Information, an event jointly sponsored by the American Chemical Society, the American Society for Information Science and Technology, and the Special Libraries Association and held every four years. Eight years ago, the theme of this conference was the chemist's workstation; papers were presented an developments enabling chemists to access and process a variety of different types of chemical information from their desktop or laboratory bench. Several of these papers were subsequently published as a Perspectives issue.
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:17:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.12, S.1136-1137
  12. Catenazzi, N.; Gibb, F.: ¬The publishing process : the hyper-book approach (1995) 0.05
    0.048122987 = product of:
      0.096245974 = sum of:
        0.012329709 = product of:
          0.036989126 = sum of:
            0.036989126 = weight(_text_:f in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036989126 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=3218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
        0.025264293 = weight(_text_:the in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025264293 = score(doc=3218,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.45590588 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
        0.018004656 = weight(_text_:of in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018004656 = score(doc=3218,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
        0.025264293 = weight(_text_:the in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025264293 = score(doc=3218,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.45590588 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the publishing process, including both paper and electronic publishing, authors, publishers and libraries, and the associated publications channels. Focuses on 1 particular publication channel, which incorporated all the steps involved from the acquisition of a manuscript in a generic markup language, such as SGML, to the presentation of the final electronic publication to the user in the library. The use of a markup language is seen as being an essential component for facilitating the exchange of electronic documents between different systems and applications. In addition, the use of a generic markup language allows several of the steps of the publishing process to be automated. Proposess a system which provides the acquisition and authoring tools required to generate electronic books, together with an appropriate interface and readers' services. The system incorporates 2 notable features: a model of an electronic book (hyper-book) based on the book metaphor; and an environment which supports the semiautomatic generation of electronic books (hyper-book builder) starting from a manuscript which is already available in SGML format
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.3, S.161-172
  13. Schwab, U.: ¬Der Information-Highway und seine Bedeutung für das elektronische Publizieren in Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlagen (1995) 0.05
    0.047113165 = product of:
      0.18845266 = sum of:
        0.023677107 = weight(_text_:information in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023677107 = score(doc=2772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
        0.04622393 = weight(_text_:und in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04622393 = score(doc=2772,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
        0.118551634 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118551634 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.72256243 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Information und Dokumentation
  14. Wessel, K.: SGML-gestütztes Publizieren im Verlagswesen (1995) 0.05
    0.046280365 = product of:
      0.18512146 = sum of:
        0.019133992 = weight(_text_:information in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019133992 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
        0.030499885 = weight(_text_:und in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030499885 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
        0.13548759 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13548759 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.82578564 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Information und Dokumentation
  15. Watters, C.: Information retrieval and the virtual document (1999) 0.05
    0.045897417 = product of:
      0.1101538 = sum of:
        0.020713156 = weight(_text_:information in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020713156 = score(doc=4319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.01934592 = weight(_text_:for in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01934592 = score(doc=4319,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.025558075 = weight(_text_:the in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558075 = score(doc=4319,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4612073 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.018978573 = weight(_text_:of in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018978573 = score(doc=4319,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
        0.025558075 = weight(_text_:the in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558075 = score(doc=4319,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4612073 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.1: The Journal, its society, and the future of print
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.1028-1029
  16. Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015) 0.05
    0.04506746 = product of:
      0.09013492 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.016570523 = weight(_text_:information in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016570523 = score(doc=2986,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
        0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015476737 = score(doc=2986,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=2986,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
        0.010735902 = weight(_text_:of in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010735902 = score(doc=2986,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=2986,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  17. Larsen, P.S.: Books and bytes : preserving documents for posterity (1999) 0.04
    0.044545405 = product of:
      0.10690897 = sum of:
        0.016912218 = weight(_text_:information in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016912218 = score(doc=4318,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
        0.02369382 = weight(_text_:for in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02369382 = score(doc=4318,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35929856 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4318,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
        0.018978573 = weight(_text_:of in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018978573 = score(doc=4318,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4318,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.1: The Journal, its society, and the future of print
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.1020-1027
  18. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.04
    0.044445496 = product of:
      0.08889099 = sum of:
        0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010147331 = score(doc=2757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020078024 = score(doc=2757,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016103853 = score(doc=2757,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020078024 = score(doc=2757,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.014275986 = product of:
          0.028551972 = sum of:
            0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028551972 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.728-739
  19. Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018) 0.04
    0.0440683 = product of:
      0.0881366 = sum of:
        0.010274758 = product of:
          0.030824272 = sum of:
            0.030824272 = weight(_text_:f in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030824272 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=4185,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=4185,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
        0.019562665 = weight(_text_:of in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019562665 = score(doc=4185,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=4185,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.4, S.619-622
  20. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.04
    0.042521685 = product of:
      0.08504337 = sum of:
        0.0050736656 = weight(_text_:information in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050736656 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.08228803 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.0057187285 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057187285 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.01692077 = weight(_text_:for in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01692077 = score(doc=1195,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25659046 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.019440461 = weight(_text_:the in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019440461 = score(doc=1195,freq=90.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35081214 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              9.486833 = tf(freq=90.0), with freq of:
                90.0 = termFreq=90.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.01844928 = weight(_text_:of in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01844928 = score(doc=1195,freq=84.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33590794 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              9.165152 = tf(freq=84.0), with freq of:
                84.0 = termFreq=84.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.019440461 = weight(_text_:the in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019440461 = score(doc=1195,freq=90.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35081214 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              9.486833 = tf(freq=90.0), with freq of:
                90.0 = termFreq=90.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.

Years

Languages

  • e 397
  • d 315
  • f 2
  • m 2
  • es 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 607
  • el 67
  • m 58
  • s 23
  • r 11
  • x 5
  • p 3
  • b 2
  • i 2
  • n 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications