Search (6150 results, page 1 of 308)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.21
    0.20925754 = product of:
      1.2555453 = sum of:
        1.2231952 = sum of:
          0.07397825 = weight(_text_:f in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07397825 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
          0.626163 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.626163 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34248218 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
          0.52305394 = weight(_text_:bcr in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.52305394 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3722417 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              1.405146 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.032350015 = weight(_text_:und in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032350015 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  2. Pietruch-Reizes, D.: Smart cities and knowledge organization (2014) 0.14
    0.1399325 = product of:
      0.23988429 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=1461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006839816 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018706596 = score(doc=1461,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.093773216 = weight(_text_:commission in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093773216 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38404492 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.015003879 = weight(_text_:of in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015003879 = score(doc=1461,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018706596 = score(doc=1461,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
        0.0783981 = sum of:
          0.05460479 = weight(_text_:communities in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05460479 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.29306096 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
          0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023793312 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Developing the EU's cities into smart and sustainable environments - in social, economic and environmental terms - is one of the Union's biggest challenges. The European Commission is taking the initiative, in its communication on Smart Cities and Communities (SCC) - European Innovation Partnership, of launching a European innovation partnership to pool resources with a view to developing and disseminating, in urban areas, innovative technical solutions based on information and communications technologies. At the moment, there are already many definitions of "smart city". Some definitions emphasize the technological issues, the other - social. For example in a publication Smart Cities Study: International study on the situation of ICT, innovation and Knowledge in cities a Smart City has been defined as a "city that uses information and communications technology to make both its critical infrastructure, its components and utilities more interactive, efficient, making citizens more aware of them." In a broader sense, "a city can be considered as "smart" when its investment in human and social capital and in communications infrastructure actively promote sustainable economic development and a high quality of life". Referring to the definition Komninos (2008) in the paper discusses the significance of the Technology, Industrial and Science Parks (TISPs) - pr oducing, exploiting, transferring and applying knowledge - in the support of inteligent cities development. We compared different types of TISPs. Used both descriptive methods (case studies, comparative analysis), as well as statistical analysis..
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013) 0.13
    0.12501244 = product of:
      0.21430705 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006839816 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018706596 = score(doc=660,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.13261536 = weight(_text_:commission in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13261536 = score(doc=660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.5431215 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.019562665 = weight(_text_:of in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019562665 = score(doc=660,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018706596 = score(doc=660,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.011896656 = product of:
          0.023793312 = sum of:
            0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023793312 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:21:46
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.448-454
  4. Heneberg, P.: Lifting the fog of scientometric research artifacts : on the scientometric analysis of environmental tobacco smoke research (2013) 0.10
    0.103274226 = product of:
      0.20654845 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006839816 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=613,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.13261536 = weight(_text_:commission in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13261536 = score(doc=613,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.5431215 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.020129817 = weight(_text_:of in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020129817 = score(doc=613,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=613,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Previous analyses identified research on environmental tobacco smoke to be subject to strong fluctuations as measured by both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The evolution of search algorithms (based on the Web of Science and Web of Knowledge database platforms) was used to show the impact of errors of omission and commission in the outcomes of scientometric research. Optimization of the search algorithm led to the complete reassessment of previously published findings on the performance of environmental tobacco smoke research. Instead of strong continuous growth, the field of environmental tobacco smoke research was shown to experience stagnation or slow growth since mid-1990s when evaluated quantitatively. Qualitative analysis revealed steady but slow increase in the citation rate and decrease in uncitedness. Country analysis revealed the North-European countries as leaders in environmental tobacco smoke research (when the normalized results were evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively), whereas the United States ranked first only when assessing the total number of papers produced. Scientometric research artifacts, including both errors of omission and commission, were shown to be capable of completely obscuring the real output of the chosen research field.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.334-344
  5. Mannocci, A.; Casarosa, V.; Manghi, P.; Zoppi, F.: ¬The Europeana network of ancient Greek and Latin epigraphy data infrastructure (2014) 0.10
    0.10115858 = product of:
      0.17341472 = sum of:
        0.010274758 = product of:
          0.030824272 = sum of:
            0.030824272 = weight(_text_:f in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030824272 = score(doc=1591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=1591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
        0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01184691 = score(doc=1591,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=1591,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
        0.093773216 = weight(_text_:commission in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093773216 = score(doc=1591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38404492 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
        0.014233928 = weight(_text_:of in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014233928 = score(doc=1591,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 1591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=1591,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 1591, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1591)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Epigraphic archives, containing collections of editions about ancient Greek and Latin inscriptions, have been created in several European countries during the last couple of centuries. Today, the project EAGLE (Europeana network of Ancient Greek and Latin Epigraphy, a Best Practice Network partially funded by the European Commission) aims at providing a single access point for the content of about 15 epigraphic archives, totaling about 1,5M digital objects. This paper illustrates some of the challenges encountered and their solution for the realization of the EAGLE data infrastructure. The challenges mainly concern the harmonization, interoperability and service integration issues caused by the aggregation of metadata from heterogeneous archives (different data models and metadata schemas, and exchange formats). EAGLE has defined a common data model for epigraphic information, into which data models from different archives can be optimally mapped. The data infrastructure is based on the D-NET software toolkit, capable of dealing with data collection, mapping, cleaning, indexing, and access provisioning through web portals or standard access protocols.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
  6. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (2010) 0.10
    0.10110896 = product of:
      0.20221792 = sum of:
        0.026847316 = weight(_text_:information in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026847316 = score(doc=3756,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.022874914 = weight(_text_:und in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022874914 = score(doc=3756,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.10161568 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10161568 = score(doc=3756,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=3756,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016103853 = score(doc=3756,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 3756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=3756,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 3756, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3756)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Often invisible to the broader society, the information disciplines determine much of what is available to these societies from their entire heritage of knowledge, culture, and entertainment. Containing the contributions of major researchers and practitioners, this third edition of the "Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences" reflects the growing convergence among the several disciplines that concern themselves with information and the cultural record. This work addresses these related disciplines in a way that demonstrates the unities across the fields and also recognizes their uniquely distinguishing characteristics. It covers a broad spectrum of related information disciplines, including: archival science; bibliography; document and genre theory; informatics; information systems; knowledge management; library and information science; museum studies; records management; and, social studies of information.
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    LCSH
    Information science / Encyclopedias
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Bibliothek / Wörterbuch
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Bibliothek / Wörterbuch
    Information science / Encyclopedias
  7. Madalli, D.P.; Prasad, A.R.D.: Analytico-synthetic approach for handling knowledge diversity in media content analysis (2011) 0.10
    0.09931034 = product of:
      0.19862068 = sum of:
        0.021715743 = weight(_text_:for in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021715743 = score(doc=4827,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32930255 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.01296031 = weight(_text_:the in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01296031 = score(doc=4827,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2338748 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.112527855 = weight(_text_:commission in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112527855 = score(doc=4827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46085387 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.005693572 = weight(_text_:of in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005693572 = score(doc=4827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.103663445 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.01296031 = weight(_text_:the in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01296031 = score(doc=4827,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2338748 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
        0.032762878 = product of:
          0.065525755 = sum of:
            0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 4827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065525755 = score(doc=4827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 4827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge space is diverse and thus extremely complex. With increased means for online publishing and communication world communities are actively contributing content. This augments the need to find and access resources in different contexts and for different purposes. Owing to different socio-cultural backgrounds, purposes and applications, knowledge generated by people is marked by diversity. Hence, knowledge representation for building diversity-aware tools presents interesting research challenges. In this paper, we provide an analytico-synthetic approach for dealing with topical diversity following a faceted subject indexing method. Illustrations are used to demonstrate facet analysis and synthesis for use in annotations for Media Content Analysis within the European Commission (EC) funded 'Living Knowledge' project.
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
  8. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.09
    0.092852406 = product of:
      0.15917556 = sum of:
        0.021558933 = weight(_text_:information in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021558933 = score(doc=2086,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.013479172 = weight(_text_:und in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013479172 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.059877615 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059877615 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36494914 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006839816 = score(doc=2086,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=2086,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.016435927 = weight(_text_:of in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016435927 = score(doc=2086,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=2086,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    An overview of the field of information organization that examines resource description as both a product and process of the contemporary digital environment. This timely book employs the unifying mechanism of the semantic web and the resource description framework to integrate the various traditions and practices of information and knowledge organization. Uniquely, it covers both the domain-specific traditions and practices and the practices of the 'metadata movement' through a single lens - that of resource description in the broadest, semantic web sense. This approach more readily accommodates coverage of the new Resource Description and Access (RDA) standard, which aims to move library cataloguing into the centre of the semantic web. The work surrounding RDA looks set to revolutionise the field of information organization, and this book will bring both the standard and its model and concepts into focus.
    BK
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Classification
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Content
    Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
    LCSH
    Libraries / information technology
    RSWK
    Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
    Subject
    Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
    Libraries / information technology
  9. Lougheed, B.; Moran, R.; Callison, C.: Reconciliation through description : using metadata to realize the vision of the National Research Centre for Truth and Reconciliation (2015) 0.09
    0.08798364 = product of:
      0.21116073 = sum of:
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=2181,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024380848 = score(doc=2181,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.1312825 = weight(_text_:commission in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1312825 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.53766286 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.017574405 = weight(_text_:of in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017574405 = score(doc=2181,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024380848 = score(doc=2181,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article will discuss the history and context surrounding the document collection and statement gathering mandates of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada and the challenges the newly established National Research Centre for Truth and Reconciliation will face in applying the Commission's metadata set in the realization of its vision. By working respectfully with Indigenous people through the implementation of Indigenous knowledge best practices and the application of contrasting traditional/non-traditional, archival/user-generated, and institutional/Indigenous descriptive elements, the Centre will attempt to create a "living archive" and facilitate Indigenous participation, collaboration, and ultimately, the process of reconciliation.
  10. Floridi, L.: ¬The philosophy of information (2011) 0.09
    0.08604767 = product of:
      0.1475103 = sum of:
        0.02091926 = weight(_text_:information in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02091926 = score(doc=3267,freq=68.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3392822 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              8.246211 = tf(freq=68.0), with freq of:
                68.0 = termFreq=68.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011437457 = score(doc=3267,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.035926573 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035926573 = score(doc=3267,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2189695 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.0058037764 = weight(_text_:for in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058037764 = score(doc=3267,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.088009804 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.02559456 = weight(_text_:the in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02559456 = score(doc=3267,freq=156.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46186572 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              12.489996 = tf(freq=156.0), with freq of:
                156.0 = termFreq=156.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.022234108 = weight(_text_:of in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022234108 = score(doc=3267,freq=122.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.40481865 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              11.045361 = tf(freq=122.0), with freq of:
                122.0 = termFreq=122.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.02559456 = weight(_text_:the in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02559456 = score(doc=3267,freq=156.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46186572 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              12.489996 = tf(freq=156.0), with freq of:
                156.0 = termFreq=156.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first volume in the tetralogy on the foundations of the philosophy of information. The reader interested in an introduction to its topics may find Information - A very Short Introduction helpful. The book fulfils three goals. The first is metatheoretical. The book describes what the philosophy of information is, its open problems, and its methods. The second goal is introductory. The book analyses the complex and diverse nature of informational concepts and phenomena, and defends the veridicality thesis and a theory of strongly semantic information. The third goal is constructive. The book tackles some classic philosophical questions in information-theoretical terms, such as how symbols acquire their semantics (the symbol-grounding problem), whether knowledge may be something different from justified true belief (the Gettier problem), or what kind of realism may be more plausible in philosophy of science (the debate on structural realism). The essential message is quite straightforward. Semantic information is well-formed, meaningful and truthful data; knowledge is relevant semantic information properly accounted for; humans are the only known semantic engines and conscious informational organisms who can develop a growing knowledge of reality; and reality is the totality of information (notice the crucial absence of "semantic").
    BK
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    Classification
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    Content
    What is the philosophy of information?. Introduction ; Philosophy of artificial intelligence as a premature paradigm of PI ; The historical emergence of PI ; The dialectic of reflection and the emergence of PI ; The definition of PI ; The analytic approach to PI ; The metaphysical approach to PI ; PI as philosophia prima -- Open problems in the philosophy of information. Introduction ; David Hilbert's view ; Analysis ; Semantics ; Intelligence ; Nature ; Values -- The method of levels of abstraction. Introduction Some definitions and preliminary examples ; A classic interpretation of the method of abstraction ; Some philosophical applications ; The philosophy of the method of abstraction --
    Semantic information and the veridicality thesis. Introduction ; The data-based approach to semantic information ; The general definition of information ; Understanding data ; Taxonomic neutrality ; Typological neutrality ; Ontological neutrality ; Genetic neutrality ; Alethic neutrality ; Why false information is not a kind of semantic information ; Why false information is pseudo-information : attributive vs predictive use ; Why false information is pseudo-information : a semantic argument ; The definition of semantic information -- Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information. Introduction ; The Bar-Hillel-Carnap paradox ; Three criteria of information equivalence ; Three desiderata for TSSI ; Degrees of vacuity and inaccuracy ; Degrees of informativeness ; Quantities of vacuity and of semantic information ; The solution of the Bar-Hillel-Carnap paradox ; TSSI and the scandal of deduction --
    The symbol grounding problem. Introduction ; The symbol of grounding problem ; The representationalist approach ; The semi-representationalist approach ; The non-representationalist approach -- Action-based semantics. Introduction ; Action-based semantics ; Two-machine artificial agents and their AbS ; From grounded symbols to grounded communication and abstractions -- Semantic information and the correctness theory of truth. Introduction ; First step : translation ; Second step : polarization ; Third step : normalization ; Fourth step : verification and validation ; Fifth step : correctness ; Some implications and advantages of the correctness theory of truth -- The logical unsolvability of the Gettier problem. Introduction ; Why the Gettier problem is unsolvable in principle ; Three objections and replies -- The logic of being informed. Introduction ; Three logics of information ; Modelling "being informed" ; Four epistemological implications of KTB-IL -- Understanding epistemic relevance. Introduction ; Epistemic vs casual relevance ; The basic case ; A probabilistic revision of the basic case ; A counterfactual revision of the probabilistic analysis ; A metatheoretical revision of the counterfactual analysis ; Advantages of the metatheoretical revision ; Some illustrative cases ; Misinformation cannot be relevant ; Two objections and replies --
    Semantic information and the network theory of account. Introduction ; The nature of the upgrading problem : mutual independence ; Solving the upgrading problem : the network theory of account ; Advantages of a network theory of account ; Testing the network theory of account -- Consciousness, agents, and the knowledge game. Introduction ; The knowledge game ; The first and classic version of the knowledge game : externally inferable states ; The second version of the knowledge game ; The third version of the knowledge game ; The fourth version of the knowledge game ; Dretske's question and the knowledge game -- Against digital ontology. Introduction ; What is digital ontology : It from bit ; The thought experiment ; Three objections and replies -- A defense of informational structural realism. Introduction ; First step : ESR and OSR are not compatible ; Second step : Relata are not logically prior to all relations ; Third step : the concept of a structural object is not empty ; Informational structural realism ; Ten objections and replies.
    LCSH
    Information science / Philosophy
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Philosophie / / Information / Informationstheorie / Philosophie
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Philosophie / / Information / Informationstheorie / Philosophie
    Information science / Philosophy
    Theme
    Information
  11. Arbelaitz, O.; Martínez-Otzeta. J.M.; Muguerza, J.: User modeling in a social network for cognitively disabled people (2016) 0.09
    0.08598074 = product of:
      0.17196149 = sum of:
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.02010487 = weight(_text_:for in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02010487 = score(doc=2639,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3048749 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018328644 = score(doc=2639,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.013946345 = weight(_text_:of in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013946345 = score(doc=2639,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018328644 = score(doc=2639,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.09407773 = sum of:
          0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065525755 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028551972 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Online communities are becoming an important tool in the communication and participation processes in our society. However, the most widespread applications are difficult to use for people with disabilities, or may involve some risks if no previous training has been undertaken. This work describes a novel social network for cognitively disabled people along with a clustering-based method for modeling activity and socialization processes of its users in a noninvasive way. This closed social network is specifically designed for people with cognitive disabilities, called Guremintza, that provides the network administrators (e.g., social workers) with two types of reports: summary statistics of the network usage and behavior patterns discovered by a data mining process. Experiments made in an initial stage of the network show that the discovered patterns are meaningful to the social workers and they find them useful in monitoring the progress of the users.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:02:26
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.305-317
  12. Theory development in the information sciences (2016) 0.09
    0.08594094 = product of:
      0.14732733 = sum of:
        0.01789821 = weight(_text_:information in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01789821 = score(doc=3701,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29028487 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.015249942 = weight(_text_:und in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015249942 = score(doc=3701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.047902092 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047902092 = score(doc=3701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29195932 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.009477528 = weight(_text_:for in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009477528 = score(doc=3701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14371942 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.0197027 = weight(_text_:the in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0197027 = score(doc=3701,freq=52.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35554436 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                52.0 = termFreq=52.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.017394148 = weight(_text_:of in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017394148 = score(doc=3701,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31669703 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
        0.0197027 = weight(_text_:the in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0197027 = score(doc=3701,freq=52.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35554436 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
              7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                52.0 = termFreq=52.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Emerging as a discipline in the first half of the twentieth century, the information sciences study how people, groups, organizations, and governments create, share, disseminate, manage, search, access, evaluate, and protect information, as well as how different technologies and policies can facilitate and constrain these activities. Given the broad span of the information sciences, it is perhaps not surprising that there is no consensus regarding its underlying theory the purposes of it, the types of it, or how one goes about developing new theories to talk about new research questions. Diane H. Sonnenwald and the contributors to this volume seek to shed light on these issues by sharing reflections on the theory-development process. These reflections are not meant to revolve around data collection and analysis; rather, they focus on the struggles, challenges, successes, and excitement of developing theories. The particular theories that the contributors explore in their essays range widely, from theories of literacy and reading to theories of design and digital search. Several chapters engage with theories of the behavior of individuals and groups; some deal with processes of evaluation; others reflect on questions of design; and the rest treat cultural and scientific heritage. The ultimate goal, Sonnenwald writes in her introduction, is to "encourage, inspire, and assist individuals striving to develop and/or teach theory development.""
    BK
    6.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    6.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Content
    Inhalt: Exploring Theory Development: Learning from Diverse Masters Behavior of Individuals and Groups Many Paths to Theory: The Creative Process in the Information Sciences Reflections on Theory Construction in Human Information Behavior: A Theory of Browsing Reflections on the Development of a Theoretical Perspective Converging on Theory from Four Sides Evaluation Drawing Graphs for Theory Development in Bibliometrics and Retrieval Two Views on Theory Development for Interactive Information Retrieval Relevance: In Search of a Theoretical Foundation The Story of a Colony: Theory Development in Webometric Research Design Theorizing the Unprecedented Appropriating Theory Theory for Design: The Case of Reading Cultural and Scientific Heritage The Poverty of Theory; or, The Education of Jerome McGann Illuminating Daughter-Mother Narratives in Young Adult Fiction The Noblest Pleasure: Theories of Understanding in the Information Sciences Apologia pro Theoria Sua Supporting Future Theory Development
    Imprint
    Austin, TX : University of Texas Press
    LCSH
    Information science
    Information theory
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Theoriebildung / Informationstheorie
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Theoriebildung / Informationstheorie
    Information science
    Information theory
  13. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.08
    0.083390296 = product of:
      0.16678059 = sum of:
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
        0.021686744 = weight(_text_:the in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021686744 = score(doc=2946,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39134735 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
        0.013946345 = weight(_text_:of in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013946345 = score(doc=2946,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
        0.021686744 = weight(_text_:the in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021686744 = score(doc=2946,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.39134735 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
        0.09407773 = sum of:
          0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065525755 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
          0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028551972 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  14. Woiniak-Kasperek, J.: Terminology as a picture of knowledge organization in a scientific discipline (2014) 0.08
    0.0831854 = product of:
      0.1663708 = sum of:
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
        0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011607553 = score(doc=1439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
        0.019223245 = weight(_text_:the in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019223245 = score(doc=1439,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34689236 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
        0.015063776 = weight(_text_:of in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015063776 = score(doc=1439,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
        0.019223245 = weight(_text_:the in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019223245 = score(doc=1439,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34689236 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
        0.09407773 = sum of:
          0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065525755 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
          0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028551972 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of the study is to explore the basics of selected present-day terminology theories and approaches, and to show their potential for knowledge organization and representation. The approach is rooted in the descriptive and comparative framework. In particular, socioterminology, communicative theory of terminology and sociocognitive approach as well as the concept theories formulated by Ingetraut Dahlberg and Birger Hjørland are investigated. In the aspect of KOSs optimization, the sociocognitive approach appears particularly interesting. It also corresponds with Hjørland's knowledge domain analysis. We should forget about devising universalistic systems for everybody, and build consistent KOSs instead which would be a picture of communication in various discourse communities. This suggestion is not new, but the tools that would help to accomplish it are new. These tools originate both from present-day terminology and information technologies (e.g. engineering ontologies).
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  15. Rosenbaum, H.; Shachaf, P.: ¬A structuration approach to online communities of practice : the case of Q&A communities (2010) 0.08
    0.082389414 = product of:
      0.16477883 = sum of:
        0.014350494 = weight(_text_:information in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014350494 = score(doc=3916,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=3916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=3916,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
        0.018883443 = weight(_text_:of in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018883443 = score(doc=3916,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=3916,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
        0.092667416 = product of:
          0.18533483 = sum of:
            0.18533483 = weight(_text_:communities in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18533483 = score(doc=3916,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.99468195 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes an approach based on structuration theory (Giddens, 1979, 1984; Orlikowski, 1992, 2000) and communities of practice (Wenger, 1998) that can be used to guide investigation into the dynamics of online question and answer (Q&A) communities. This approach is useful because most research on Q&A sites has focused attention on information retrieval, information-seeking behavior, and information intermediation and has assumed uncritically that the online Q&A community plays an important role in these domains of study. Assuming instead that research on online communities should take into account social, technical, and contextual factors (Kling, Rosenbaum, & Sawyer, 2005), the utility of this approach is demonstrated with an analysis of three online Q&A communities seen as communities of practice. This article makes a theoretical contribution to the study of online Q&A communities and, more generally, to the domain of social reference.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.9, S.1933-1944
  16. Bao, Z.; Han, Z.: What drives users' participation in online social Q&A communities? : an empirical study based on social cognitive theory (2019) 0.08
    0.08186025 = product of:
      0.19646461 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
        0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019372 = score(doc=5497,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
        0.012553146 = weight(_text_:of in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012553146 = score(doc=5497,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
        0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019372 = score(doc=5497,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
        0.14589335 = sum of:
          0.12210003 = weight(_text_:communities in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12210003 = score(doc=5497,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.65530425 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
          0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023793312 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine some drivers of users' participation in online social question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social cognitive theory and then identify the underlying mechanism of this process. Design/methodology/approach This study developed a research model to test the proposed hypotheses, and an online survey was employed to collected data. Totally, 313 valid responses were collected, and partial least squares structural equation modeling was adopted to analyze these data. Findings This study empirically finds that the outcome expectations (personal outcome expectations and knowledge self-management outcome expectations) are positively related to participation in online social Q&A communities. At the same time, users' self-efficacy positively influences their participation behaviors. It can not only directly motivate users' participation, but also indirectly promote participation behaviors through the two dimensions of outcome expectations. Besides, perceived expertise and perceived similarity are two positive and significant environmental elements affecting users' participation. Originality/value This study extends the understanding about how participation behaviors will be motivated in the context of online social Q&A communities. Drawing on the social cognitive theory, constructs were established based on the features of these communities. Meanwhile, some mediating effects in the motivating process were also discussed.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.5, S.637-656
  17. Nathan, L.P.: Sustainable information practice : an ethnographic investigation (2012) 0.08
    0.080752194 = product of:
      0.16150439 = sum of:
        0.020713156 = weight(_text_:information in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020713156 = score(doc=496,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
        0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00967296 = score(doc=496,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
        0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019372 = score(doc=496,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
        0.02068142 = weight(_text_:of in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02068142 = score(doc=496,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37654874 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
        0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016019372 = score(doc=496,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
        0.0783981 = sum of:
          0.05460479 = weight(_text_:communities in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05460479 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.29306096 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
          0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023793312 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This project develops the concept of sustainable information practice within the field of information science. The inquiry is grounded by data from a study of 2 ecovillages, intentional communities striving to ground their daily activities in a set of core values related to sustainability. Ethnographic methods employed for over 2 years resulted in data from hundreds of hours of participant observation, semistructured interviews with 22 community members, and a diverse collection of community images and texts. Analysis of the data highlights the tensions that arose and remained as community members experienced breakdowns between community values related to sustainability and their daily information practices. Contributions to the field of information science include the development of the concept of sustainable information practice, an analysis of why community members felt unable to adapt their information practices to better match community concepts of sustainability, and an assessment of the methodological challenges of information practice inquiry within a communal, nonwork environment. Most broadly, this work contributes to our larger understanding of the challenges faced by those attempting to identify and develop more sustainable information practices. In addition, findings from this investigation call into question previous claims that groups of individuals with strong value commitments can adapt their use of information tools to better support their values. In contrast, this work suggests that information practices can be particularly resilient to local, value-based adaptation.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.11, S.2254-2268
  18. Accidental information discovery : cultivating serendipity in the digital age (2016) 0.08
    0.07911282 = product of:
      0.15822564 = sum of:
        0.022690123 = weight(_text_:information in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022690123 = score(doc=4230,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.016175007 = weight(_text_:und in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016175007 = score(doc=4230,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.071853146 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071853146 = score(doc=4230,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.437939 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=4230,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.012731214 = weight(_text_:of in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012731214 = score(doc=4230,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=4230,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Accidental Information Discovery: Cultivating Serendipity in the Digital Age provides readers with an interesting discussion on the ways serendipity-defined as the accidental discovery of valued information-plays an important role in creative problem-solving. This insightful resource brings together discussions on serendipity and information discovery, research in computer and information science, and interesting thoughts on the creative process. Five thorough chapters explore the significance of serendipity in creativity and innovation, the characteristics of serendipity-friendly tools and minds, and how future discovery environments may encourage serendipity. - Examines serendipity in a multidisciplinary context - Bridges theory and practice - Explores digital information landscapes of the future with essays from current researchers - Brings the concept of accidental discovery and its value front and center
    BK
    06.99 Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges
    Classification
    06.99 Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges
    LCSH
    Information behavior
    Subject
    Information behavior
  19. Hara, N.; Sanfilippo, M.R.: Analysis of roles in engaging contentious online discussions in science (2017) 0.08
    0.07789218 = product of:
      0.15578435 = sum of:
        0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010147331 = score(doc=3762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
        0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014216291 = score(doc=3762,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
        0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020078024 = score(doc=3762,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
        0.018004656 = weight(_text_:of in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018004656 = score(doc=3762,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
        0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020078024 = score(doc=3762,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
        0.073260024 = product of:
          0.14652005 = sum of:
            0.14652005 = weight(_text_:communities in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14652005 = score(doc=3762,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.78636515 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The prevalence of sites in which users can contribute content increases ordinary citizens' participation in emerging forms of knowledge sharing. This article investigates the practices associated with the roles of participants who actively contribute to the coproduction of knowledge in three online communities and how these roles differ in controversial and noncontroversial threads. The Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine was selected as a contentious scientific topic because of persistent belief about an alleged link between the vaccine and autism. Contributions to three online communities that engage mothers with young children were analyzed to identify participant roles. No consistent roles were evident in noncontroversial threads, but the role of mediator consistently appeared in controversial threads in all three communities. This study helps to articulate the roles played in online communities that engage in knowledge collaboration. The variety of roles in online communities has implications for both the study for practice and the design of information technologies.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.1953-1966
  20. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.08
    0.07786626 = product of:
      0.13348503 = sum of:
        0.013235906 = weight(_text_:information in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013235906 = score(doc=2274,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21466857 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.009435421 = weight(_text_:und in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009435421 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12120757 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.041914333 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041914333 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2554644 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=2274,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.019714538 = weight(_text_:the in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019714538 = score(doc=2274,freq=68.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35575798 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              8.246211 = tf(freq=68.0), with freq of:
                68.0 = termFreq=68.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.015928157 = weight(_text_:of in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015928157 = score(doc=2274,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29000556 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.019714538 = weight(_text_:the in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019714538 = score(doc=2274,freq=68.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35575798 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              8.246211 = tf(freq=68.0), with freq of:
                68.0 = termFreq=68.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    This is a practical guide to using web metrics to measure impact and demonstrate value. The web provides an opportunity to collect a host of different metrics, from those associated with social media accounts and websites to more traditional research outputs. This book is a clear guide for library and information professionals as to what web metrics are available and how to assess and use them to make informed decisions and demonstrate value. As individuals and organizations increasingly use the web in addition to traditional publishing avenues and formats, this book provides the tools to unlock web metrics and evaluate the impact of this content. The key topics covered include: bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics; data collection tools; evaluating impact on the web; evaluating social media impact; investigating relationships between actors; exploring traditional publications in a new environment; web metrics and the web of data; the future of web metrics and the library and information professional. The book will provide a practical introduction to web metrics for a wide range of library and information professionals, from the bibliometrician wanting to demonstrate the wider impact of a researcher's work than can be demonstrated through traditional citations databases, to the reference librarian wanting to measure how successfully they are engaging with their users on Twitter. It will be a valuable tool for anyone who wants to not only understand the impact of content, but demonstrate this impact to others within the organization and beyond.
    BK
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Content
    1. Introduction. MetricsIndicators -- Web metrics and Ranganathan's laws of library science -- Web metrics for the library and information professional -- The aim of this book -- The structure of the rest of this book -- 2. Bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics. Web metrics -- Information science metrics -- Web analytics -- Relational and evaluative metrics -- Evaluative web metrics -- Relational web metrics -- Validating the results -- 3. Data collection tools. The anatomy of a URL, web links and the structure of the web -- Search engines 1.0 -- Web crawlers -- Search engines 2.0 -- Post search engine 2.0: fragmentation -- 4. Evaluating impact on the web. Websites -- Blogs -- Wikis -- Internal metrics -- External metrics -- A systematic approach to content analysis -- 5. Evaluating social media impact. Aspects of social network sites -- Typology of social network sites -- Research and tools for specific sites and services -- Other social network sites -- URL shorteners: web analytic links on any site -- General social media impact -- Sentiment analysis -- 6. Investigating relationships between actors. Social network analysis methods -- Sources for relational network analysis -- 7. Exploring traditional publications in a new environment. More bibliographic items -- Full text analysis -- Greater context -- 8. Web metrics and the web of data. The web of data -- Building the semantic web -- Implications of the web of data for web metrics -- Investigating the web of data today -- SPARQL -- Sindice -- LDSpider: an RDF web crawler -- 9. The future of web metrics and the library and information professional. How far we have come -- The future of web metrics -- The future of the library and information professional and web metrics.

Languages

Types

  • a 5342
  • el 707
  • m 463
  • s 121
  • x 95
  • r 34
  • n 13
  • b 9
  • i 5
  • p 3
  • ag 2
  • v 2
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications