Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Introduction to a Special Issue of Knowledge Organization (2003) 0.02
    0.019616583 = product of:
      0.039233167 = sum of:
        0.026562318 = weight(_text_:et in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026562318 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.12959956 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.012670848 = product of:
          0.025341695 = sum of:
            0.025341695 = weight(_text_:al in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341695 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.12658678 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is with very great pleasure that we introduce this special issue of Knowledge Organization on Domain Analysis (DA). Domain analysis is an approach to information science (IS) that emphasizes the social, historical, and cultural dimensions of information. It asserts that collective fields of knowledge, or "domains," form the unit of analysis of information science (IS). DA, elsewhere referred to as a sociocognitive (Hjoerland, 2002b; Jacob & Shaw, 1998) or collectivist (Talja et al, 2004) approach, is one of the major metatheoretical perspectives available to IS scholars to orient their thinking and research. DA's focus an domains stands in contrast to the alternative metatheories of cognitivism and information systems, which direct attention to psychological processes and technological processes, respectively. The first comprehensive international formulation of DA as an explicit point of view was Hjoerland and Albrechtsen (1995). However, a concern for information in the context of a community can be traced back to American library historian and visionary Jesse Shera, and is visible a century ago in the earliest practices of special librarians and European documentalists. More recently, Hjoerland (1998) produced a domain analytic study of the field of psychology; Jacob and Shaw (1998) made an important interpretation and historical review of DA; while Hjoerland (2002a) offered a seminal formulation of eleven approaches to the study of domains, receiving the ASLIB 2003 Award. Fjordback Soendergaard; Andersen and Hjoerland (2003) suggested an approach based an an updated version of the UNISIST-model of scientific communication. In fall 2003, under the conference theme of "Humanizing Information Technology" DA was featured in a keynote address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Hjorland, 2004). These publications and events are evidence of growth in representation of the DA view. To date, informal criticism of domain analysis has followed two tracks. Firstly, that DA assumes its communities to be academic in nature, leaving much of human experience unexplored. Secondly, that there is a lack of case studies illustrating the methods of domain analytic empirical research. Importantly, this special collection marks progress by addressing both issues. In the articles that follow, domains are perceived to be hobbies, professions, and realms of popular culture. Further, other papers serve as models of different ways to execute domain analytic scholarship, whether through traditional empirical methods, or historical and philosophical techniques. Eleven authors have contributed to this special issue, and their backgrounds reflect the diversity of interest in DA. Contributors come from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Academics from leading research universities are represented. One writer is newly retired, several are in their heyday as scholars, and some are doctoral students just entering this field. This range of perspectives enriches the collection. The first two papers in this issue are invited papers and are, in our opinion, very important. Anders Oerom was a senior lecturer at the Royal Scbool of 'Library and Information Science in Denmark, Aalborg Branch. He retired from this position an March 1, 2004, and this paper is his last contribution in this position. We are grateful that he took the time to complete "Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes" in spite of many other duties. Versions of the paper have previously been presented at a Ph.D-course in knowledge organization and related versions have been published in Danish and Spanish. In many respects, it represents a model of how a domain could, or should, be investigated from the DA point of view.
  2. Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Understandings of language and cognition : implications for classification research (1994) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 8884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=8884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8884)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010) 0.01
    0.010577007 = product of:
      0.04230803 = sum of:
        0.04230803 = weight(_text_:r in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04230803 = score(doc=3323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung zu: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1076-1077.
  4. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The phrase "information storage and retrieval" (IS&R) : an historical note (2015) 0.01
    0.009254881 = product of:
      0.037019525 = sum of:
        0.037019525 = weight(_text_:r in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037019525 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.006610629 = product of:
      0.026442517 = sum of:
        0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026442517 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Spärck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of the Journal of Documentation celebration, "60 years of the best in information research". Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Sparck Jones as its starting-point. Analysis involves distinctions between "positivism" and "pragmatism" and "classical" versus Kuhnian understandings of concepts. Findings - Classification, both manual and automatic, for retrieval benefits from drawing upon a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, a consideration of theories of meaning, and the adding of top-down approaches to IR in which divisions of labour, domains, traditions, genres, document architectures etc. are included as analytical elements and in which specific IR algorithms are based on the examination of specific literatures. Introduces an example illustrating the consequences of a full implementation of a pragmatist understanding when handling homonyms. Practical implications - Outlines how to classify from a pragmatic-philosophical point of view. Originality/value - Provides, emphasizing a pragmatic understanding, insights of importance to classification for retrieval, both manual and automatic. - Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.319-332.
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.01
    0.006610629 = product of:
      0.026442517 = sum of:
        0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026442517 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.01
    0.006610629 = product of:
      0.026442517 = sum of:
        0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026442517 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.
  8. Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01
    0.0051785368 = product of:
      0.020714147 = sum of:
        0.020714147 = product of:
          0.041428294 = sum of:
            0.041428294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041428294 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:11:22
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.0051785368 = product of:
      0.020714147 = sum of:
        0.020714147 = product of:
          0.041428294 = sum of:
            0.041428294 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041428294 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  10. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.00
    0.004438746 = product of:
      0.017754983 = sum of:
        0.017754983 = product of:
          0.035509966 = sum of:
            0.035509966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035509966 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  11. Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002) 0.00
    0.003966378 = product of:
      0.015865512 = sum of:
        0.015865512 = weight(_text_:r in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015865512 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.00
    0.003698955 = product of:
      0.01479582 = sum of:
        0.01479582 = product of:
          0.02959164 = sum of:
            0.02959164 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02959164 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.00
    0.003698955 = product of:
      0.01479582 = sum of:
        0.01479582 = product of:
          0.02959164 = sum of:
            0.02959164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02959164 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.00
    0.003698955 = product of:
      0.01479582 = sum of:
        0.01479582 = product of:
          0.02959164 = sum of:
            0.02959164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02959164 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  15. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    0.0018494775 = product of:
      0.00739791 = sum of:
        0.00739791 = product of:
          0.01479582 = sum of:
            0.01479582 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01479582 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27